HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Off-duty Cops Kill Man wi...

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 04:36 PM

Off-duty Cops Kill Man with Down's Syndrome

The death of a man with Down syndrome while in police custody was ruled a homicide by the chief medical examiner’s office in Baltimore.

The 26-year-old, Robert Ethan Saylor, was so enamored with law enforcement that he would call 911 just to ask questions. About a month ago, he'd gone to see "Zero Dark Thirty” and immediately wanted to see it again. When he refused to leave the Frederick, Md., movie theater, security was called, and three off-duty deputies arrived: Lt. Scott Jewell, Sgt. Rick Rochford and Deputy First Class James Harris.

According to the Washington Post, "Saylor cursed at the deputies, who weren’t wearing uniforms, and began hitting and kicking them. The deputies restrained him using three sets of handcuffs linked together and escorted him from the theater." At some point, he "ended up on the ground ... suffered a medical emergency and died."

Patti Saylor, Ethan’s mother, told the CBS local Baltimore station, “He has never had anybody put their hands on him before in his life. He would not have been doing anything threatening to anybody.”


Poor guy...hope those phuckers do time.

2 replies, 1335 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 2 replies Author Time Post
Reply Off-duty Cops Kill Man with Down's Syndrome (Original post)
joeybee12 Feb 2013 OP
riverwalker Feb 2013 #1
joeybee12 Feb 2013 #2

Response to joeybee12 (Original post)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 05:32 PM

1. couldn't these "public servants"

pooled their money and buy the kid a $5.00 ticket to see the movie again?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to riverwalker (Reply #1)

Wed Feb 20, 2013, 05:35 PM

2. Are you kidding, treat him humanely????

That's certainly not part of protect and serve, at least not in their definition.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread