Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:08 PM Feb 2013

So, those who claimed the police burned Chris Dorner to death

We await your conspiracy theory as to why the coroner found he died of a gunshot to the head.


Capt. Kevin Lacy of the San Bernardino County Sheriff-Coroner said a 6-hour autopsy conducted by the Riverside County Coroner’s Division showed that Dorner died of a single gunshot wound to the head.

“During the autopsy yesterday, the doctor who conducted the process, concluded that the cause of death was a single gunshot wound to the head,” Lacy said, adding that officials are not yet ready to comment on the manner of his death.

“We will tell you that while we’re still compiling the information and putting our reports together, the information that we have right now seems to indicate that the wound that took Christopher Dorner’s life was self-inflicted,” Lacy said.


http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/02/15/sheriff-john-mcmahon-dorner-died-from-gunshot-to-head/

If he died of suicide, not much to be outraged about, ergo he must not have committed suicide.
115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, those who claimed the police burned Chris Dorner to death (Original Post) geek tragedy Feb 2013 OP
You'd shoot yourself in the head, too, if your other option was to burn to death. NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #1
His other option was to fulfill his legal duty to surrender and walk out hands on head geek tragedy Feb 2013 #3
Presumes doors weren't locked or blocked from outside. NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #6
Sounds like something for the Creative Speculation forum. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #7
does anyone with any credibility still opine the pentagon was not a plane loli phabay Feb 2013 #19
No one with any credibility ever maintined that in the first place. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #23
true but there are stull people who claim weird stuff about it loli phabay Feb 2013 #25
Well, here we have "maybe the police ran up to the sniper's position and physically placed a geek tragedy Feb 2013 #28
And Dorner sat there and allowed them to do it. Adsos Letter Feb 2013 #40
How does one lock a house's door from the outside? geek tragedy Feb 2013 #42
I suppose they could have gotten the key from the owner. Adsos Letter Feb 2013 #49
But you could still unlock it from the inside. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #50
Indeed. n/t Adsos Letter Feb 2013 #51
not if it is a double deadbolt and you have no key hfojvt Feb 2013 #89
While being shot at, police ran up and locked/blocked the doors so he couldn't get out? uppityperson Feb 2013 #20
I think they used chemtrails. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #22
LEO pulled WALLS down... there wasn't a door that could have kept him inside. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2013 #30
The lock didn't stop him on the way in jberryhill Feb 2013 #75
I think it was Peregrine Took logic that took hold, and the cops should have seen it coming. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #101
after seeing what happened to those ladies delivering newspapers that was a viable option for him? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2013 #76
You do know that was a totally different set of cops, right? uppityperson Feb 2013 #77
Does that make that much difference? quakerboy Feb 2013 #78
So if 1 set of police shoot someone who just happens to be human, then you assume a different set uppityperson Feb 2013 #83
7 cops were involved in the shooting of those women VanillaRhapsody Feb 2013 #94
You do know that was a totally different set of cops, right? uppityperson Feb 2013 #97
Thin Blue Line mean anything to you? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2013 #98
I am having brussel sprouts for supper tonight. uppityperson Feb 2013 #99
I made no such assumption quakerboy Feb 2013 #114
Since they were looking for him for days, seems he could have given himself up at some point. uppityperson Feb 2013 #115
Please. It's his fault and his fault alone he didn't surrender. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #91
So, you are saying "he shot himself in the head to avoid being shot"? jberryhill Feb 2013 #95
Saying if my choices are... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2013 #96
no energumen Feb 2013 #113
Agreed. treestar Feb 2013 #100
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #105
No shit! Webster Green Feb 2013 #44
This is true. We saw that on Sep11th Cali_Democrat Feb 2013 #68
HIs other option was to tell them he would surrender treestar Feb 2013 #102
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #104
My opposition if you could call it that was Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #2
Yet another fallacious appeal ... Trajan Feb 2013 #4
So, you admit you were wrong? geek tragedy Feb 2013 #5
Bifurcation fallacy Trajan Feb 2013 #10
The CT that the cops meant to burn him alive has one slight flaw: geek tragedy Feb 2013 #55
Were you there? The News media reported, and played the tape to prove it, that sabrina 1 Feb 2013 #61
He killed himself after the cops sent in the industrial strength tear gas geek tragedy Feb 2013 #69
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #106
For Gawds sake it was obvious that he shot himself 2pooped2pop Feb 2013 #87
Alerted on... Agschmid Feb 2013 #34
LOL, what logic is that? When they set it on fire, they didn't know he was dead. Get it? n-t Logical Feb 2013 #8
He wasn't dead when they sent the CS gas in. There was a gunshot after they did. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #9
Funny, so your defense is they tried to burn him to death but he shot himself first so no foul? Logical Feb 2013 #12
No, they used the stronger version of tear gas after the weaker one didn't get him out. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #13
You know it is possible that Dormer is a worthless piece of shit and the police are corrupt idiots? Logical Feb 2013 #14
Some police are. You have no evidence these police were. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #17
OK, I love this. Please justify shooting the paper delivery van and the surfer. Sunspots? n-t Logical Feb 2013 #21
Those were completely unacceptable and should be referred to a grand jury. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #26
How much do you know about Grand Juries and police being charged? n-t Logical Feb 2013 #31
Sorry, I guess that calling for a criminal investigation and due process geek tragedy Feb 2013 #33
+1 Adsos Letter Feb 2013 #43
Of course. Nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #46
diffwrent police than the sheriffs ar big bear loli phabay Feb 2013 #27
Never ascribe to malice... Archae Feb 2013 #38
stupid, negligent, and incompetent BainsBane Feb 2013 #64
that was decided here on DU before it even happened treestar Feb 2013 #103
This message was self-deleted by its author Union Scribe Feb 2013 #41
I am glad the incident is over and glad there were no hostages or any other deaths. PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #11
Well, you realize that the tear gas they used usually doesn't start a raging inferno? geek tragedy Feb 2013 #15
I listened to the scanner tapes and watched the video. PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #24
Yes, the CS gas did start a fire. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #29
Listen to the scanner tapes. PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #32
Two different tapes. The guy screaming burn the motherfucker is not geek tragedy Feb 2013 #35
Do you have a link to those? I keep reading about them but haven't come across them and would like uppityperson Feb 2013 #37
In a rapid scan of the video forum this is the first I found. PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #45
I listened and nothing about "burn that m-fucker" or anything like that. uppityperson Feb 2013 #47
I agree the burn MF is not on that video as I had listened just to where they start talking about PufPuf23 Feb 2013 #57
Aside from "burn the m-f-er", I am wondering if "burn" in the case of tear gas means it is working? uppityperson Feb 2013 #59
The "burn this motherfucker" tape was from hours earlier. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #48
Link TorchTheWitch Feb 2013 #72
At this, it's hard to know what to believe..reporting on this case was terribly mis-managed.. HipChick Feb 2013 #16
Autopsy says bullet to the brain. Pretty straightforward. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #18
Goes to show you should not expect Latest Breaking News to necessarily be accurate. Speed does not uppityperson Feb 2013 #39
Here's a nice pastry for you. blkmusclmachine Feb 2013 #36
Not mutually exclusive Nevernose Feb 2013 #52
No, it is not even reasonable that the police were planning to kill him with arson. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #53
I give you mad props for the Clash reference Nevernose Feb 2013 #54
Well, the truth is somewhere along the lines of: geek tragedy Feb 2013 #56
Soooooooo... theKed Feb 2013 #58
how could they know? BainsBane Feb 2013 #65
The autopsy was conducted after they sent the tear gas in. By about a day or so. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #71
People choose to jump out of a 100-story building rather than burn to death on 9/11 davidn3600 Feb 2013 #60
interesting!!! bigapple1963 Feb 2013 #62
Not sure I agree with your police work there, bigapple1963. Bolo Boffin Feb 2013 #63
what about this scenario bigapple1963 Feb 2013 #67
You still have gross neglience bordering on intent on the part of the police Bolo Boffin Feb 2013 #73
If I had wanted to surrender BainsBane Feb 2013 #66
Option 3: LEAVE THE BUILDING geek tragedy Feb 2013 #70
I guess what we've learned today jberryhill Feb 2013 #74
Dorner would still be alive if there had been a good guy with a gun there. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #90
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #107
Are you the real Sam Harris, the author? JaneyVee Feb 2013 #109
I hope to god not, for the real Sam Harris's sake. nt geek tragedy Feb 2013 #110
I thought he was found in a basement? quakerboy Feb 2013 #79
He was TorchTheWitch Feb 2013 #86
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #108
That would seem to make sense quakerboy Feb 2013 #112
Dude, your stuff lately has more red herrings than Russia in autumn. Bonobo Feb 2013 #80
a little more info: steve2470 Feb 2013 #81
Being that Chris Dorner was a one time member of the LA Pig Force himself....... left on green only Feb 2013 #82
Feeling the only way he could live with himself was to murder someone's daughter is really sad. For uppityperson Feb 2013 #84
Agreed! Revenge is perhaps the most vile and most destructive of all human traits. left on green only Feb 2013 #85
He could have surrendered at any point during the week before he died. geek tragedy Feb 2013 #92
If he died of a gunshot to the head, how are they going to study his brain as he requested.... a kennedy Feb 2013 #88
This is a common effect of depression on the brain jberryhill Feb 2013 #93
Message auto-removed SamHarris2012 Feb 2013 #111
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. You'd shoot yourself in the head, too, if your other option was to burn to death.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:12 PM
Feb 2013

We don't know that they did or did not prevent his ability to surrender.

We don't know that he did or didn't choose suicide over just walking out the door.

We don't know if he even had the choice.

Not much of a conspiracy theory, I suppose.

I just abhor the burning up of buildings by law enforcement when there are other options.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. His other option was to fulfill his legal duty to surrender and walk out hands on head
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:15 PM
Feb 2013

Kind of funny how the outrage junkies miss that one.

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
6. Presumes doors weren't locked or blocked from outside.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:17 PM
Feb 2013

I wasn't there, you weren't there.

Unlikely, but not impossible, who knows...

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. Sounds like something for the Creative Speculation forum.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:19 PM
Feb 2013

Perhaps the "no plane hit the Pentagon" caucus can opine.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
28. Well, here we have "maybe the police ran up to the sniper's position and physically placed a
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:47 PM
Feb 2013

barricade at the door."

It's fiction writing.

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
40. And Dorner sat there and allowed them to do it.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:04 AM
Feb 2013

Just, as they say, to make things a little more interesting.

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
49. I suppose they could have gotten the key from the owner.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:12 AM
Feb 2013

Which is a ridiculous thought on the very face of it.

Yeah, the CT stuff is really getting into some serious woo, imo.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
50. But you could still unlock it from the inside.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:13 AM
Feb 2013

People are clutching at straws as well as their pearls.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
20. While being shot at, police ran up and locked/blocked the doors so he couldn't get out?
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:38 PM
Feb 2013

That is something.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
75. The lock didn't stop him on the way in
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 03:43 AM
Feb 2013

I guess someone called a locksmith to fix it once he was inside this windowless house.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
101. I think it was Peregrine Took logic that took hold, and the cops should have seen it coming.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 08:10 PM
Feb 2013

"The closer you are to danger, the further away from harm."

Cops should have known that he'd choose the safe way out by staying inside a burning building, and the even safer route of shooting himself.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
76. after seeing what happened to those ladies delivering newspapers that was a viable option for him?
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:03 AM
Feb 2013

Kind of funny how some overlook that.

quakerboy

(13,916 posts)
78. Does that make that much difference?
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:16 AM
Feb 2013

It never seems to make a lot of difference from one group of law enforcement to another. They all scratch each others backs, and very very few of them step across the blue line when things go wrong.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
83. So if 1 set of police shoot someone who just happens to be human, then you assume a different set
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 05:00 AM
Feb 2013

will not let someone else surrender? Because...all cops are the same? I must say I expected something different from a quaker name with ghandi as an icon. I am surprised.

quakerboy

(13,916 posts)
114. I made no such assumption
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:29 PM
Feb 2013

I have no idea if he was given an opportunity to surrender.

I do know that police everywhere regularly shoot other citizens with little or no reason. I do know that Police officers regularly brutalize citizens, all over the nation. LAPD is not some odd case in this, it is just one more example among many.

Are all cops intending to be bad cops? No. I imagine many of them join on intending to make the world a better place. But the fact is they do not cross the blue line once they are in. And that includes protecting the bad apples among them from justice, against the needs of the public, against the rights of innocents, against the law. And that makes them, as a group, corrupt. Even the ones who have never harassed a passerby or shot someone.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
115. Since they were looking for him for days, seems he could have given himself up at some point.
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:52 PM
Feb 2013

I agree that the Cop Code (my term) makes it difficult to get any supervision of them and makes the system corrupt.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
91. Please. It's his fault and his fault alone he didn't surrender.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:31 AM
Feb 2013

His entire goal was to kill as many cops (as well as the children and spouses of cops) before dying himself. He had ample opportunity to surrender, and refused it.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
95. So, you are saying "he shot himself in the head to avoid being shot"?
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:58 PM
Feb 2013

I guess those ladies delivering newspapers should have guns, so they would have been able to save themselves by shooting themselves in the head too!
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. Saying if my choices are...
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 05:01 PM
Feb 2013

being riddled with bullets and whatever else that meant by the same guys who just sent 7 "burners" into the building to potentially burn me alive....or shoot myself in the head. Yeah...I'd choose to shoot myself in the head instead.

energumen

(76 posts)
113. no
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:22 PM
Feb 2013

He shot himself in the head to avoid going to jail
Cops, even ex cops, aren't terribly popular there

treestar

(82,383 posts)
100. Agreed.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 08:07 PM
Feb 2013

They skip that entirely. They post like we all have a right to hold the cops to a standoff to the death. Indefinitely.

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #3)

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
68. This is true. We saw that on Sep11th
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:23 AM
Feb 2013

People would rather jump from a 110 story building than be burned alive.

Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
2. My opposition if you could call it that was
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:12 PM
Feb 2013

the military style massive deployment man hunt etc, we don't go after persons much worse than him with that kind of determination. As far as this report goes I believe it. I never believed he was cooked alive.

 

Trajan

(19,089 posts)
10. Bifurcation fallacy
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:24 PM
Feb 2013

I do nothing of the sort ... any reasonable person can see the snide misdirection of this line of discussion ...

I meant what I said before ...

We are done, O'Fallacious one ...

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
55. The CT that the cops meant to burn him alive has one slight flaw:
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:27 AM
Feb 2013

Dorner could have foiled it by leaving the cabin.

It's a little known fact that some people, when inside a burning building, decide to walk from inside the building to an area outside the building.

As it turns out, Dorner had a legal obligation to walk out of that cabin, hands on his head, before the use of the weaker tear gas, before the use of the CS gas, and before the fire started.

But, it wasn't too late for him to walk out of the cabin when the fire did start.

Amazingly, the police plot to burn him to death never contemplated this possibility!!!!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
61. Were you there? The News media reported, and played the tape to prove it, that
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:27 AM
Feb 2013

the cops burned the cabin. I watched the reporting and heard the tape that night. If he killed himself, then it was unnecessary to burn down the cabin. Why did they do that? There was an army outside, he wasn't going anywhere other than committing suicide which in his case was probably what he intended anyhow.

He was wrong to do what he did regardless of his reasons, however the problem the LAPD has is their own reputation, not too many people have much faith in them so there will be plenty of CTs and plenty or reminders of other incidents, which I have already seen on the MSM, of their own past behavior. And that is the problem when the cops are allowed to use excessive force so often in this country with no consequences, they lose respect from the people. And that is no CT, it is a fact and something badly needs to be done about it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
69. He killed himself after the cops sent in the industrial strength tear gas
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:32 AM
Feb 2013

Unclear whether he shot himself because of the tear gas or the fire, since he was in the basement.

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #55)

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
87. For Gawds sake it was obvious that he shot himself
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 09:34 AM
Feb 2013

and they have admitted they caused the fires even if they say unintentionally.

Not a damned thing is new here but you keep trying to start a DU fight.

This is my last response to you on it, but damn dude, give it a rest already. It appears that you like to shit stir.

It was obvious that after the fire started he shot himself. DUH!

Now, I do hope they check to make sure it was him who killed the deputy. I saw a video of a bunch of cops walking along and one just stops and starts shooting into the woods. Hopefully into empty woods but what a fucked foolhardy thing to do.

Oh by the way, we have a guy in our area who just killed two people and put a 7 year old in ICU. I'm just waiting for all the massive police effort here to find him. Oh, no massive manhunt for him? Got to kill a cop for that? Two systems of justice in this land. One for them and one for us. You won't see it till it's pointed at you, but one day it may be. You will see the injustice the poor see daily.

Good day to you, Geek. May we agree on another topic someday. I said Good Day!

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
34. Alerted on...
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:56 PM
Feb 2013
Voted to leave but you could reconsider wording I guess.

At Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:37 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Yet another fallacious appeal ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2383619

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

"Disgusting" is a personal attack

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:48 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Disgusting is *not* a personal attack. I've seen much worse. Sorry.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: At first I wondered if he meant the idea was disgusting, but no, it wasn't worded that way, so yes I think it is a personal attack.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. No, they used the stronger version of tear gas after the weaker one didn't get him out.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:31 PM
Feb 2013

Occam's Razor--they used tear gas for the purpose police always use tear gas.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
14. You know it is possible that Dormer is a worthless piece of shit and the police are corrupt idiots?
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:33 PM
Feb 2013
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
17. Some police are. You have no evidence these police were.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:35 PM
Feb 2013

Incendiary tear gas usually does not start a fire. Sometimes it does.

It does release a nasty form of tear gas all the time.

Logic.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
26. Those were completely unacceptable and should be referred to a grand jury.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:45 PM
Feb 2013

See what I did there? I judged what one group of cops did on its own merit based on the facts, rather than picking a side of either "cops good" or "cops bad" and forcing my theory to fit that assumption.

Logic says that when police use tear gas in the situation where tear gas is usually used, they were using it as tear gas. Especially since CS gas usually does not start a fire.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
33. Sorry, I guess that calling for a criminal investigation and due process
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:56 PM
Feb 2013

for criminal suspects is illegitimate when the suspected bad guys are cops.

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
43. +1
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:08 AM
Feb 2013
I judged what one group of cops did on its own merit based on the facts, rather than picking a side of either "cops good" or "cops bad" and forcing my theory to fit that assumption.


And that speaks directly to much of what fuels the CT stuff on this case, imo.

Archae

(46,301 posts)
38. Never ascribe to malice...
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:01 AM
Feb 2013

What can better be explained with simple stupidity.

And the cops who shot at the surfer and the delivery ladies were simply stupid.
Blithering stupid, they should be fired.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
103. that was decided here on DU before it even happened
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 08:12 PM
Feb 2013

It's obvious there are many posters who always intended to find LAPD at fault.

Response to Logical (Reply #12)

PufPuf23

(8,754 posts)
11. I am glad the incident is over and glad there were no hostages or any other deaths.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:25 PM
Feb 2013

Dorner was not going to get out of that cabin alive regardless.

There is no excuse for his actions at all. He got what he deserved, expected and wanted according to his manifesto.

I can hold in my head the likely facts that he killed himself even before the fire and that the fire was deliberately set by law enforcement at the same time.

What is so hard about holding these thoughts simulotaneously and what the heck does that have to with with conspiracy theory?

Seems to me the events as they unfolded were straightforward.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
15. Well, you realize that the tear gas they used usually doesn't start a raging inferno?
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:33 PM
Feb 2013

It's tear gas, not a fire bomb.

PufPuf23

(8,754 posts)
24. I listened to the scanner tapes and watched the video.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:44 PM
Feb 2013

Reminded me of the end of the SLA.

What is your problem besides denial of your own eyes and ears?

It happened its over, let us hope that like events don't occur in the future.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
29. Yes, the CS gas did start a fire.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:50 PM
Feb 2013

That does not mean that was the plan, merely that it was a possibility when they launched it.

PufPuf23

(8,754 posts)
32. Listen to the scanner tapes.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:55 PM
Feb 2013

To paraphrase, "follow the plan and burn the motherfucker".

That fact is every bit as evident as that Dohner was a murdering asshole.

Use your ears. Done.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
35. Two different tapes. The guy screaming burn the motherfucker is not
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:57 PM
Feb 2013

in command and that does not happen in the same time frame as the deployment of the CS gas.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
37. Do you have a link to those? I keep reading about them but haven't come across them and would like
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:01 AM
Feb 2013

to hear it for myself. Thank you.

PufPuf23

(8,754 posts)
57. I agree the burn MF is not on that video as I had listened just to where they start talking about
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:41 AM
Feb 2013

the burn plan about one minute in (edit to add)when posted.

You may very well be correct that the burn plan and burn the motherfucker were not at the same time and obviously not the same person.

That tape is obvious the fire was set deliberately by plan. That fact is extremely clear, no doubt.

One can also find tapes with the burn the motherfucker.

I don't get the big deal?

Dohner was a murderous asshole and what happened happened and he got what he asked for in his manifesto.

The fact is there are tapes that have law enforcement talking about a burn plan and and acting on it.

The fact is if one looks some more there are law enforcement rather emotionally saying burn the motherfucker.

I am not making any value judgement at all except Dohner was a murderous asshole.

These are the only Dohner posts I have even made.

Both that there was an enacted burn plan and the statement burn the motherfucker out are recorded cannot be questioned if one listens to tapes available at DU.

Ye gads, did better if had not tried to clarify in edit. lol

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
59. Aside from "burn the m-f-er", I am wondering if "burn" in the case of tear gas means it is working?
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:07 AM
Feb 2013

jargon/lingo sort of thing? I have no clue, just wondering if the term is used in that way since every profession or group ends up using words in a jargon way that isn't common useage for the rest of us.

I have no dog in this fight, have made few Dorner posts also.

And very much agree that the actions of all the police and sheriffs involved will need close investigation.

I'd like to hear the "burn the mfer" but not enough to go listen to a bunch of vids hoping it is in there, if that makes sense.

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
72. Link
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:52 AM
Feb 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022364793

It was posted on DU earlier. Someone says "burn that motherfucker" and "burn him out". That says to me that the intention (as is always the intention in such a drastic measure) in burning the cabin - had it been burned on purpose - was to burn it to force him out of the cabin. I had always thought that "burn that motherfucker" referred to the cabin, not to Dorner as in 'burn that motherfucking cabin' anyway. Seems pretty clear to me that was what was meant seeing as it was followed by "burn him out".


 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
18. Autopsy says bullet to the brain. Pretty straightforward.
Fri Feb 15, 2013, 11:36 PM
Feb 2013

It takes a long time to burn to death.

This was pretty obvious.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
39. Goes to show you should not expect Latest Breaking News to necessarily be accurate. Speed does not
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:02 AM
Feb 2013

mean accuracy. I agree, the reporting has been terrible. Most reporting on things as they are happening are.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
52. Not mutually exclusive
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:15 AM
Feb 2013

He might have killed himself in close conjunction with the arson. And one might have occurred before the other. Right now, the evidence looks like Dorner intended to kill himself while, simultaneously, the police were planning to kill him via arson.

The middle ground is not always a fallacy. Just because one was in the wrong does not mean the other was in the right. They can both be wrong. If you don't believe me, check out the Israel/Palestine forum.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
53. No, it is not even reasonable that the police were planning to kill him with arson.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:19 AM
Feb 2013

EVEN IF the police meant to start that fire, the most likely outcome (other than suicide) would have been Dorner leaving the building, either with his hands on his head or on the trigger of his gun. (Bonus Clash reference).

Which is exactly the purpose of a tear gas use in the first place.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
54. I give you mad props for the Clash reference
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:22 AM
Feb 2013

But I doubt there is anything that could convince me that they had even the slightest intention of taking him alive. I know too many cops, and worked too long in the DA's office.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
56. Well, the truth is somewhere along the lines of:
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 12:32 AM
Feb 2013

Rules of engagement were to accept a surrender if the subject was clearly not a threat. But, if any part of him even twitches, take no chances.

The more dangerous a fugitive, the less likely he will be taken alive.

theKed

(1,235 posts)
58. Soooooooo...
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:00 AM
Feb 2013

They knew he was dead by self-inflicted gunshot, then proceeded to torch the building?

I don't get it.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
60. People choose to jump out of a 100-story building rather than burn to death on 9/11
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:11 AM
Feb 2013

Which would you choose? Burn to death or shoot yourself. That's the option the cops gave Dorner.

 

bigapple1963

(111 posts)
62. interesting!!!
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:40 AM
Feb 2013

Why didn't Dorner jump out of the ground floor window instead of shooting himself?

Why did he shoot himself before the fire started? Oh no, I'm gonna burn to death! I better shoot myself before the fire starts.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
63. Not sure I agree with your police work there, bigapple1963.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:55 AM
Feb 2013

If Dorner shot himself before the fire started, then he didn't start the fire. That leaves only the police to start the fire.

If the police knew he'd shot himself, why send in the flammable tear gas and start the fire? Obviously they thought he was still alive (assuming he was actually dead before all this) and sent in the tear gas, knowing (some police on tape loudly hoping) that it could start a fire.

So they didn't burn him to death. It's clear to me and a lot of people that they either tried to or didn't care if they did. I don't agree at all with Dorner's actions here, but the LAPD has much to answer for as well.

 

bigapple1963

(111 posts)
67. what about this scenario
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:12 AM
Feb 2013

Police sent him tear gas and started tearing down the walls.
He was overwhelmed by the tear gas and knew that police were coming.
He didn't want to surrender so he shot himself.
Tear gas causes the fire.

LAPD wasn't in charge of the final operations at the cabin.



By the way, how badly his lungs were burnt and whether there was any smoke in his lungs can pretty much prove the sequence of events (whether he shot himself before or after the fire started).

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
73. You still have gross neglience bordering on intent on the part of the police
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 03:34 AM
Feb 2013

LAPD has a lot to answer for, whether they were in charge at the end or not.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
70. Option 3: LEAVE THE BUILDING
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 02:34 AM
Feb 2013

Upon leaving the building, he could either continue shooting at the cops, or surrender.

I've seen about 5 people act is if shooting himself and burning to death were options, but WALKING OUT OF THE BUILDING wasn't.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
74. I guess what we've learned today
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 03:36 AM
Feb 2013

Is that people who work in tall office buidlings should bring a gun, in case there is a fire.

"Have a good day at the office dear, and don't forget your gun."

Wayne LaPierre should be all over this!

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #70)

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
86. He was
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 06:50 AM
Feb 2013

Apparently, at some point he made the decision to hole up in the basement where he shot himself. So, instead of leaving the house when it caught fire and surrendering he chose to hole up in the basement and kill himself before burning or choking to death.


Response to TorchTheWitch (Reply #86)

quakerboy

(13,916 posts)
112. That would seem to make sense
Sun Feb 17, 2013, 11:15 PM
Feb 2013

Its interesting all the permutations that this case presents. There really doesn't seem to be a "good guy" in the whole scenario, except perhaps the ladies in the truck that got shot up.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
80. Dude, your stuff lately has more red herrings than Russia in autumn.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:27 AM
Feb 2013

The police's conduct or misconduct has nothing to do with him shooting himself in the head.

How can you NOT see that?

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
81. a little more info:
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:49 AM
Feb 2013
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dorner-20130216,0,3243239.story

*snip*

The blaze started shortly after police fired "pyrotechnic" tear gas into the cabin; the canisters are known as "burners" because the intense heat they emit often causes a fire.

Sheriff's Capt. Gregg Herbert, who led the assault on the cabin, said the canisters were used only as a last resort after Dorner continued firing at deputies, ignored commands to surrender and did not respond when "cold," less intense tear gas was shot into the wood-framed dwelling.

Herbert said that a tractor was deployed to tear down walls of the cabin to expose Dorner's whereabouts inside, but that Dorner set off smoke bombs to hide himself. Storming the cabin was considered too dangerous because of the belief that Dorner "was lying in wait for us," he said.

"This was our only option," Herbert said of the pyrotechnic tear gas, adding that the potential for igniting a fire was taken into account.

*snip*

left on green only

(1,484 posts)
82. Being that Chris Dorner was a one time member of the LA Pig Force himself.......
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 04:52 AM
Feb 2013

....I am sure that he would have already known that setting fire to, and burning down houses where any high profile stand-off battle rages, is the SOP of the LA pigs. One case in point that I am sure could not have escaped his radar was a "few" years earlier when the Pigs set fire to, and burned down the house in LA suburbia where Donald DeFreeze (Sen Que, SLA) was holed up in.

That having been said, I am also sure that he had enough mental acuity to know well enough how to "pick his battles". And I am also of a mind to say that he therefore must have decided of his own accord that his end was going to happen in the way that it did. He must have known, well before the stand off began, that it was only a matter of time before the pigs would set the house on fire, and that after the flames began, he would then have the option of either being slowly burned alive (viz DeFreeze), or else checking out very quickly through an action of his own doing.

I remember noting also back after the DeFreeze incident how the "official statement" from the pigs (spoken out of the right side of their mouth) was that they had "no idea" how the house fire got started ("musta been a 'hot' bullet, ya think?&quot .

I am not condoning in any way the horrific actions that Dorner accomplished before his demise. But I do think that the bigger story behind that scene, is the corruption within the organization that he targeted. He must have fully realized that there was no way that anyone would ever permit him to live and expose the scathing truth that he knew.

For me, the saddest part of this entire incident was that he felt that what he did was the only way that he could live with himself.

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
84. Feeling the only way he could live with himself was to murder someone's daughter is really sad. For
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 05:03 AM
Feb 2013

me, the saddest part is that daughter he murdered to get back at her father.

left on green only

(1,484 posts)
85. Agreed! Revenge is perhaps the most vile and most destructive of all human traits.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 05:34 AM
Feb 2013

I think I remember that the Greeks wrote some very thought provoking plays that dealt with that very subject.

When I think about evolution from my prison of Socrates, I sometimes wonder how many millennia will come to pass before the capacity to take revenge will be universally eliminated from our genetic makeup. Yet I have also come to realize that some of us possess a level of consciousness that is ahead of that time.

The way of the sage is to act but not to compete - I Ching

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
92. He could have surrendered at any point during the week before he died.
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 11:33 AM
Feb 2013

Instead he tried to murder every LEO officer who tried to arrest him.

There is one person who has moral culpability in his death, and that's him, the protestations of the anti-cop bigots notwithstanding.

a kennedy

(29,615 posts)
88. If he died of a gunshot to the head, how are they going to study his brain as he requested....
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 10:11 AM
Feb 2013

"If possible, I want my brain preserved for science/research to study the effects of severe depression on an individual’s brain. Since 6/26/08 when I was relieved of duty and 1/2/09 when I was terminated I have been afflicted with severe depression." It's just so sad all this happened.

Response to geek tragedy (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, those who claimed the...