General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, those who claimed the police burned Chris Dorner to death
We await your conspiracy theory as to why the coroner found he died of a gunshot to the head.
Capt. Kevin Lacy of the San Bernardino County Sheriff-Coroner said a 6-hour autopsy conducted by the Riverside County Coroners Division showed that Dorner died of a single gunshot wound to the head.
During the autopsy yesterday, the doctor who conducted the process, concluded that the cause of death was a single gunshot wound to the head, Lacy said, adding that officials are not yet ready to comment on the manner of his death.
We will tell you that while were still compiling the information and putting our reports together, the information that we have right now seems to indicate that the wound that took Christopher Dorners life was self-inflicted, Lacy said.
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/02/15/sheriff-john-mcmahon-dorner-died-from-gunshot-to-head/
If he died of suicide, not much to be outraged about, ergo he must not have committed suicide.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)We don't know that they did or did not prevent his ability to surrender.
We don't know that he did or didn't choose suicide over just walking out the door.
We don't know if he even had the choice.
Not much of a conspiracy theory, I suppose.
I just abhor the burning up of buildings by law enforcement when there are other options.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Kind of funny how the outrage junkies miss that one.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I wasn't there, you weren't there.
Unlikely, but not impossible, who knows...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Perhaps the "no plane hit the Pentagon" caucus can opine.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)barricade at the door."
It's fiction writing.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Just, as they say, to make things a little more interesting.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)This is my favorite CT of the day.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Which is a ridiculous thought on the very face of it.
Yeah, the CT stuff is really getting into some serious woo, imo.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)People are clutching at straws as well as their pearls.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)AHA!!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)That is something.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I guess someone called a locksmith to fix it once he was inside this windowless house.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)"The closer you are to danger, the further away from harm."
Cops should have known that he'd choose the safe way out by staying inside a burning building, and the even safer route of shooting himself.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Kind of funny how some overlook that.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)LAPD vs county sheriffs.
quakerboy
(13,916 posts)It never seems to make a lot of difference from one group of law enforcement to another. They all scratch each others backs, and very very few of them step across the blue line when things go wrong.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)will not let someone else surrender? Because...all cops are the same? I must say I expected something different from a quaker name with ghandi as an icon. I am surprised.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)yeah that happens EVERY day!
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)LAPD vs county sheriffs.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)quakerboy
(13,916 posts)I have no idea if he was given an opportunity to surrender.
I do know that police everywhere regularly shoot other citizens with little or no reason. I do know that Police officers regularly brutalize citizens, all over the nation. LAPD is not some odd case in this, it is just one more example among many.
Are all cops intending to be bad cops? No. I imagine many of them join on intending to make the world a better place. But the fact is they do not cross the blue line once they are in. And that includes protecting the bad apples among them from justice, against the needs of the public, against the rights of innocents, against the law. And that makes them, as a group, corrupt. Even the ones who have never harassed a passerby or shot someone.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I agree that the Cop Code (my term) makes it difficult to get any supervision of them and makes the system corrupt.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)His entire goal was to kill as many cops (as well as the children and spouses of cops) before dying himself. He had ample opportunity to surrender, and refused it.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I guess those ladies delivering newspapers should have guns, so they would have been able to save themselves by shooting themselves in the head too!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)being riddled with bullets and whatever else that meant by the same guys who just sent 7 "burners" into the building to potentially burn me alive....or shoot myself in the head. Yeah...I'd choose to shoot myself in the head instead.
He shot himself in the head to avoid going to jail
Cops, even ex cops, aren't terribly popular there
treestar
(82,383 posts)They skip that entirely. They post like we all have a right to hold the cops to a standoff to the death. Indefinitely.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #3)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed
Webster Green
(13,905 posts)Did they really need to burn the place to the ground?
WTF?!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)People would rather jump from a 110 story building than be burned alive.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Response to NYC_SKP (Reply #1)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)the military style massive deployment man hunt etc, we don't go after persons much worse than him with that kind of determination. As far as this report goes I believe it. I never believed he was cooked alive.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I have learned a lot about you this last week ...
Disgusting ..
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Or are you alleging a cover up?
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I do nothing of the sort ... any reasonable person can see the snide misdirection of this line of discussion ...
I meant what I said before ...
We are done, O'Fallacious one ...
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Dorner could have foiled it by leaving the cabin.
It's a little known fact that some people, when inside a burning building, decide to walk from inside the building to an area outside the building.
As it turns out, Dorner had a legal obligation to walk out of that cabin, hands on his head, before the use of the weaker tear gas, before the use of the CS gas, and before the fire started.
But, it wasn't too late for him to walk out of the cabin when the fire did start.
Amazingly, the police plot to burn him to death never contemplated this possibility!!!!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)the cops burned the cabin. I watched the reporting and heard the tape that night. If he killed himself, then it was unnecessary to burn down the cabin. Why did they do that? There was an army outside, he wasn't going anywhere other than committing suicide which in his case was probably what he intended anyhow.
He was wrong to do what he did regardless of his reasons, however the problem the LAPD has is their own reputation, not too many people have much faith in them so there will be plenty of CTs and plenty or reminders of other incidents, which I have already seen on the MSM, of their own past behavior. And that is the problem when the cops are allowed to use excessive force so often in this country with no consequences, they lose respect from the people. And that is no CT, it is a fact and something badly needs to be done about it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Unclear whether he shot himself because of the tear gas or the fire, since he was in the basement.
Response to geek tragedy (Reply #55)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)and they have admitted they caused the fires even if they say unintentionally.
Not a damned thing is new here but you keep trying to start a DU fight.
This is my last response to you on it, but damn dude, give it a rest already. It appears that you like to shit stir.
It was obvious that after the fire started he shot himself. DUH!
Now, I do hope they check to make sure it was him who killed the deputy. I saw a video of a bunch of cops walking along and one just stops and starts shooting into the woods. Hopefully into empty woods but what a fucked foolhardy thing to do.
Oh by the way, we have a guy in our area who just killed two people and put a 7 year old in ICU. I'm just waiting for all the massive police effort here to find him. Oh, no massive manhunt for him? Got to kill a cop for that? Two systems of justice in this land. One for them and one for us. You won't see it till it's pointed at you, but one day it may be. You will see the injustice the poor see daily.
Good day to you, Geek. May we agree on another topic someday. I said Good Day!
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)At Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:37 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Yet another fallacious appeal ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2383619
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
"Disgusting" is a personal attack
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Feb 15, 2013, 10:48 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Disgusting is *not* a personal attack. I've seen much worse. Sorry.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: At first I wondered if he meant the idea was disgusting, but no, it wasn't worded that way, so yes I think it is a personal attack.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Logical
(22,457 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Occam's Razor--they used tear gas for the purpose police always use tear gas.
Logical
(22,457 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Incendiary tear gas usually does not start a fire. Sometimes it does.
It does release a nasty form of tear gas all the time.
Logic.
Logical
(22,457 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)See what I did there? I judged what one group of cops did on its own merit based on the facts, rather than picking a side of either "cops good" or "cops bad" and forcing my theory to fit that assumption.
Logic says that when police use tear gas in the situation where tear gas is usually used, they were using it as tear gas. Especially since CS gas usually does not start a fire.
Logical
(22,457 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)for criminal suspects is illegitimate when the suspected bad guys are cops.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)I judged what one group of cops did on its own merit based on the facts, rather than picking a side of either "cops good" or "cops bad" and forcing my theory to fit that assumption.
And that speaks directly to much of what fuels the CT stuff on this case, imo.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Archae
(46,301 posts)What can better be explained with simple stupidity.
And the cops who shot at the surfer and the delivery ladies were simply stupid.
Blithering stupid, they should be fired.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)and should definitely be fired.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's obvious there are many posters who always intended to find LAPD at fault.
Response to Logical (Reply #12)
Union Scribe This message was self-deleted by its author.
PufPuf23
(8,754 posts)Dorner was not going to get out of that cabin alive regardless.
There is no excuse for his actions at all. He got what he deserved, expected and wanted according to his manifesto.
I can hold in my head the likely facts that he killed himself even before the fire and that the fire was deliberately set by law enforcement at the same time.
What is so hard about holding these thoughts simulotaneously and what the heck does that have to with with conspiracy theory?
Seems to me the events as they unfolded were straightforward.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It's tear gas, not a fire bomb.
PufPuf23
(8,754 posts)Reminded me of the end of the SLA.
What is your problem besides denial of your own eyes and ears?
It happened its over, let us hope that like events don't occur in the future.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)That does not mean that was the plan, merely that it was a possibility when they launched it.
PufPuf23
(8,754 posts)To paraphrase, "follow the plan and burn the motherfucker".
That fact is every bit as evident as that Dohner was a murdering asshole.
Use your ears. Done.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)in command and that does not happen in the same time frame as the deployment of the CS gas.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)to hear it for myself. Thank you.
PufPuf23
(8,754 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)PufPuf23
(8,754 posts)the burn plan about one minute in (edit to add)when posted.
You may very well be correct that the burn plan and burn the motherfucker were not at the same time and obviously not the same person.
That tape is obvious the fire was set deliberately by plan. That fact is extremely clear, no doubt.
One can also find tapes with the burn the motherfucker.
I don't get the big deal?
Dohner was a murderous asshole and what happened happened and he got what he asked for in his manifesto.
The fact is there are tapes that have law enforcement talking about a burn plan and and acting on it.
The fact is if one looks some more there are law enforcement rather emotionally saying burn the motherfucker.
I am not making any value judgement at all except Dohner was a murderous asshole.
These are the only Dohner posts I have even made.
Both that there was an enacted burn plan and the statement burn the motherfucker out are recorded cannot be questioned if one listens to tapes available at DU.
Ye gads, did better if had not tried to clarify in edit. lol
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)jargon/lingo sort of thing? I have no clue, just wondering if the term is used in that way since every profession or group ends up using words in a jargon way that isn't common useage for the rest of us.
I have no dog in this fight, have made few Dorner posts also.
And very much agree that the actions of all the police and sheriffs involved will need close investigation.
I'd like to hear the "burn the mfer" but not enough to go listen to a bunch of vids hoping it is in there, if that makes sense.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)From some guys getting shot at.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)It was posted on DU earlier. Someone says "burn that motherfucker" and "burn him out". That says to me that the intention (as is always the intention in such a drastic measure) in burning the cabin - had it been burned on purpose - was to burn it to force him out of the cabin. I had always thought that "burn that motherfucker" referred to the cabin, not to Dorner as in 'burn that motherfucking cabin' anyway. Seems pretty clear to me that was what was meant seeing as it was followed by "burn him out".
HipChick
(25,485 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)It takes a long time to burn to death.
This was pretty obvious.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)mean accuracy. I agree, the reporting has been terrible. Most reporting on things as they are happening are.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)He might have killed himself in close conjunction with the arson. And one might have occurred before the other. Right now, the evidence looks like Dorner intended to kill himself while, simultaneously, the police were planning to kill him via arson.
The middle ground is not always a fallacy. Just because one was in the wrong does not mean the other was in the right. They can both be wrong. If you don't believe me, check out the Israel/Palestine forum.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)EVEN IF the police meant to start that fire, the most likely outcome (other than suicide) would have been Dorner leaving the building, either with his hands on his head or on the trigger of his gun. (Bonus Clash reference).
Which is exactly the purpose of a tear gas use in the first place.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)But I doubt there is anything that could convince me that they had even the slightest intention of taking him alive. I know too many cops, and worked too long in the DA's office.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Rules of engagement were to accept a surrender if the subject was clearly not a threat. But, if any part of him even twitches, take no chances.
The more dangerous a fugitive, the less likely he will be taken alive.
theKed
(1,235 posts)They knew he was dead by self-inflicted gunshot, then proceeded to torch the building?
I don't get it.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)Since they weren't in the cabin?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Which would you choose? Burn to death or shoot yourself. That's the option the cops gave Dorner.
bigapple1963
(111 posts)Why didn't Dorner jump out of the ground floor window instead of shooting himself?
Why did he shoot himself before the fire started? Oh no, I'm gonna burn to death! I better shoot myself before the fire starts.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)If Dorner shot himself before the fire started, then he didn't start the fire. That leaves only the police to start the fire.
If the police knew he'd shot himself, why send in the flammable tear gas and start the fire? Obviously they thought he was still alive (assuming he was actually dead before all this) and sent in the tear gas, knowing (some police on tape loudly hoping) that it could start a fire.
So they didn't burn him to death. It's clear to me and a lot of people that they either tried to or didn't care if they did. I don't agree at all with Dorner's actions here, but the LAPD has much to answer for as well.
bigapple1963
(111 posts)Police sent him tear gas and started tearing down the walls.
He was overwhelmed by the tear gas and knew that police were coming.
He didn't want to surrender so he shot himself.
Tear gas causes the fire.
LAPD wasn't in charge of the final operations at the cabin.
By the way, how badly his lungs were burnt and whether there was any smoke in his lungs can pretty much prove the sequence of events (whether he shot himself before or after the fire started).
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)LAPD has a lot to answer for, whether they were in charge at the end or not.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)I would have called the media and announced my intentions.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Upon leaving the building, he could either continue shooting at the cops, or surrender.
I've seen about 5 people act is if shooting himself and burning to death were options, but WALKING OUT OF THE BUILDING wasn't.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Is that people who work in tall office buidlings should bring a gun, in case there is a fire.
"Have a good day at the office dear, and don't forget your gun."
Wayne LaPierre should be all over this!
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #70)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)quakerboy
(13,916 posts)Did I misunderstand that?
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)Apparently, at some point he made the decision to hole up in the basement where he shot himself. So, instead of leaving the house when it caught fire and surrendering he chose to hole up in the basement and kill himself before burning or choking to death.
Response to TorchTheWitch (Reply #86)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed
quakerboy
(13,916 posts)Its interesting all the permutations that this case presents. There really doesn't seem to be a "good guy" in the whole scenario, except perhaps the ladies in the truck that got shot up.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)The police's conduct or misconduct has nothing to do with him shooting himself in the head.
How can you NOT see that?
steve2470
(37,457 posts)*snip*
The blaze started shortly after police fired "pyrotechnic" tear gas into the cabin; the canisters are known as "burners" because the intense heat they emit often causes a fire.
Sheriff's Capt. Gregg Herbert, who led the assault on the cabin, said the canisters were used only as a last resort after Dorner continued firing at deputies, ignored commands to surrender and did not respond when "cold," less intense tear gas was shot into the wood-framed dwelling.
Herbert said that a tractor was deployed to tear down walls of the cabin to expose Dorner's whereabouts inside, but that Dorner set off smoke bombs to hide himself. Storming the cabin was considered too dangerous because of the belief that Dorner "was lying in wait for us," he said.
"This was our only option," Herbert said of the pyrotechnic tear gas, adding that the potential for igniting a fire was taken into account.
*snip*
left on green only
(1,484 posts)....I am sure that he would have already known that setting fire to, and burning down houses where any high profile stand-off battle rages, is the SOP of the LA pigs. One case in point that I am sure could not have escaped his radar was a "few" years earlier when the Pigs set fire to, and burned down the house in LA suburbia where Donald DeFreeze (Sen Que, SLA) was holed up in.
That having been said, I am also sure that he had enough mental acuity to know well enough how to "pick his battles". And I am also of a mind to say that he therefore must have decided of his own accord that his end was going to happen in the way that it did. He must have known, well before the stand off began, that it was only a matter of time before the pigs would set the house on fire, and that after the flames began, he would then have the option of either being slowly burned alive (viz DeFreeze), or else checking out very quickly through an action of his own doing.
I remember noting also back after the DeFreeze incident how the "official statement" from the pigs (spoken out of the right side of their mouth) was that they had "no idea" how the house fire got started ("musta been a 'hot' bullet, ya think?" .
I am not condoning in any way the horrific actions that Dorner accomplished before his demise. But I do think that the bigger story behind that scene, is the corruption within the organization that he targeted. He must have fully realized that there was no way that anyone would ever permit him to live and expose the scathing truth that he knew.
For me, the saddest part of this entire incident was that he felt that what he did was the only way that he could live with himself.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)me, the saddest part is that daughter he murdered to get back at her father.
left on green only
(1,484 posts)I think I remember that the Greeks wrote some very thought provoking plays that dealt with that very subject.
When I think about evolution from my prison of Socrates, I sometimes wonder how many millennia will come to pass before the capacity to take revenge will be universally eliminated from our genetic makeup. Yet I have also come to realize that some of us possess a level of consciousness that is ahead of that time.
The way of the sage is to act but not to compete - I Ching
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Instead he tried to murder every LEO officer who tried to arrest him.
There is one person who has moral culpability in his death, and that's him, the protestations of the anti-cop bigots notwithstanding.
a kennedy
(29,615 posts)"If possible, I want my brain preserved for science/research to study the effects of severe depression on an individuals brain. Since 6/26/08 when I was relieved of duty and 1/2/09 when I was terminated I have been afflicted with severe depression." It's just so sad all this happened.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
SamHarris2012 Message auto-removed