HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Ronald Dworkin, legal sch...

Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:19 PM


Ronald Dworkin, legal scholar and great liberal thinker, has died

Ronald Dworkin, Legal Philosopher, Dies at 81
Published: February 14, 2013

Ronald Dworkin, a legal philosopher and public intellectual of bracingly liberal views who insisted that morality is the touchstone of constitutional interpretation, died Thursday in London. He was 81.


Professor Dworkin was “the primary legal philosopher of his generation,” said Judge Guido Calabresi, a former dean of Yale Law School who now sits on the federal appeals court in New York. He was also one of the most closely read as a mainstay of The New York Review of Books, contributing articles to it for decades.

Professor Dworkin’s central argument started with the premise that the crucial phrases in the Constitution — “the freedom of speech,” “due process of law,” “equal protection of the laws” — were, as he put it, “drafted in exceedingly abstract moral language.”

“These clauses,” he continued, “must be understood in the way their language most naturally suggests: they refer to abstract moral principles and incorporate these by reference, as limits on the government’s power.”

The rest: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/15/us/ronald-dworkin-legal-philosopher-dies-at-81.html?hp

1 replies, 614 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Ronald Dworkin, legal scholar and great liberal thinker, has died (Original post)
WilliamPitt Feb 2013 OP
leveymg Feb 2013 #1

Response to WilliamPitt (Original post)

Thu Feb 14, 2013, 12:36 PM

1. I'm also afraid that his idea of "substantive due process," rather than procedural, has died here.

Dworkin, like others in his generation, were willing to stretch the limits of rights to a view that a multitude of inherent rights are founded in basic fairness -- rather than limited to expressed rights -- whereas most of the legal theorists (and almost all the jurists) today seem content to settle for "all the process that is due."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread