HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Scalia. Heller vs D.C.

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 04:12 PM

Scalia. Heller vs D.C.


... the Constitution permits a broad range of gun safety measures. In the landmark Second Amendment case, Heller v. DC, Justice Scalia argued that the state can restrict ownership of “dangerous and unusual” weapons and that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”


District of Columbia v. Heller

I remember while watching the Justice Sonia Sotomayor confirmation hearing they talked a lot about Heller and at the time I avoided going to do research about what all the fuss was about - I guess now (those of us that aren't familiar with it) we'll have to do a bit of research

1 replies, 2057 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Scalia. Heller vs D.C. (Original post)
Tx4obama Jan 2013 OP
Recursion Jan 2013 #1

Response to Tx4obama (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2013, 04:15 PM

1. Heller actually extended the scope of regulation past the previous case, Miller

Miller had said that Congress can only ban weapons that are not sufficiently military.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread