General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJournal News gun permit map endangers officers, officials say
Inmates at the Rockland County jail are taunting corrections officers by saying they know the guards' home addresses -- information they got from the list published by Westchester-based newspaper, Rockland County Sheriff Louis Falco said.
"Since about 9:30 this morning, I've been in a meeting with my corrections officers and their unions. They have inmates coming up to them and telling them exactly where they live. That's not acceptable to me," Falco said at a news conference Friday morning in New City, where local leaders condemned the list.
http://newyork.newsday.com/news/nation/journal-news-gun-permit-map-endangers-officers-officials-say-1.4407323
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)If the guards are humane and decent, they should have nothing to fear.
If they're the type that get off on dehumanizing the inmates? Well, you reap what you sow...
hack89
(39,171 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)....and mistreat inmates and then brag about it to their buddies.
What about the inmates again?
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)My offense was to suggest that he still posed a danger & should complete some anger management treatment before being released from parole. He refused to do it & blamed me when his parole was extended.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)to warn me when she sees me driving up.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)They will still target them either for threats or leverage to use the guards to bring in contraband. I for one wouldnt want to rely on their humanity for my or my family's safety.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...if they REALLY fear for their safety. Besides, as the article showed, they're fucking ARMED!
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)You think being armed is going to protect their families when they are at work. Or do you think there is some code of honour that forbids hurting family members.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Why defend the sociopaths?
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)I suggest you visit a correctional facility and see that there are highly dangerous individuals amongst the non violent inmates.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...both of whom I love (one is deceased).
I listened to them, and their unique perspective, since I was 8 years old.
I also have a brother who is a convicted felon.
I listened to him, and his unique perspective, for the last 2 years.
I suggest you become better informed than you are right now.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Seems you need to go talk to your brother again.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)From BOTH sides (yes, I've heard BOTH sides), he was professional and benevolent. He's been retired for 8 years and has NEVER received a threat.
Seems you need to go talk to your bum again.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Most are just talk but when someone like the brotherhood takes offence then its a serious deal.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)One former charge of his told me he'd take a bullet for my brother.
Keep watching "Oz".
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I remember the syndicated show. It was great 70's kitch!
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)sir pball
(4,737 posts)Turnabout is fair play!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)from both sides of the debate. Hardly anecdotal. Nice try though!
sir pball
(4,737 posts)You're using a dataset derived from three family members - I don't give a fig what you think.
FWIW the (multiple) felons I know generally got along with the screws, and my screw uncle, while a beer-swilling hyperconservative hyper-Catholic prick, treats his inmates pretty well...or at least never gets any kind of crap from them. So you're WRONG! HA!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I have been immersed in both sides of the debate, equally on both sides, and have formulated my informed opinion based on my numerous coversations.
Your FWIW statement reinforces my informed opinion.
Again, nice try. You're new at this, no?
sir pball
(4,737 posts)I've been here since 2005, I just prefer to lurk in general because even back then there was no real conversation to be had. It does make for a diversion from Slashdot, more so lately since they've turned into an astroturf farm. Nope, I didn't read the entire thread - your attitude at the get-go, and instant dismissal of "anecdote" when that's all you have to go on, told me pretty much everything I need to know about your mentality in a few short posts. I've been playing this game long enough that I don't need to waste my time on fifty repetitions of the same theme.
Frankly, I don't care how much you've "immersed yourself" in the issue; conversations (without proper recording and presentation, at least - but I highly doubt you're a trained and published sociologist) are ANECDOTES no matter how "numerous" and your OPINION is just that. You are not the sole arbiter of the facts at hand; you can't present anything beyond your own experiences and preconceptions but are so secure in your beliefs that you actually think you get to pat me on the head and give me a cookie, or something. It would be cute if it weren't so aggravating, and that's why I'm going to do what I've done since the 90s - leave my house and do something. Have fun on the internet
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Bake
(21,977 posts)Boo fucking hoo.
Bake
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Another one that jumps in midthread w/o reading the entire thing...
Bake
(21,977 posts)I just didn't think much of them. Still anecdotal.
Bake
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)It's too dangerous because it is too likely an inmate will be able to get hold of the weapon.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)I know prison guards and jailors. Personally. I live in a city that has a large, maximum security prison in the center of it. The people that clamor for these jobs are the LAST people who should have a position of authority, because they're precisely the type of people who abuse that position.
JoeBlowToo
(253 posts)It's simple enough to follow someone from work to their home.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Yes it is not hard to get the info but why make it easier.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The ones who do their job PROFESSIONALLY will have NOTHING to fear.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Do you really think it matters to these orgs how a guard does his job.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...straight from a place where ill-informed-opinion rules, and truth takes a "back seat". Get what I mean?
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)"Well, I've talked to an actual aardvark and he said ALL ants are bad!"
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)If it makes you feel safe.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)CO's and Cops are sociopaths who are still allowed to carry a gun.
Your point is?
Coyote_Tan
(194 posts)... Who deserves violence against individuals and families.
I'm sure they'll be more than fair.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Some of them are downright mean.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)There are also retired judges, prosecutors, and police officers with whom inmates may have an axe to grind.
And battered women and stalking victims who are trying to hide from their batterers and stalkers.
Did the editors of the Journal News think about them?
If ONE person gets hurt or killed because the paper published that map, would you even care?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)To protect themselves?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Nobody claims that a gun creates some kind of magic force field to protect you from bad things. It's a weapon to be used in a desperate last-ditch fight when all other defensive measures, INCLUDING AS HAVING AN UNLISTED ADDRESS, have failed.
So the paper should not have published their addresses, even though the law permits it.
We solved that "It's public information" canard here in California in 1994 after a tragedy that you may remember.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Schaeffer
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...than those who are in a jail cell, unarmed. It's statistics.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...they already have criminal records.
Why didn't the Journal News print a map of people who tried to get permits but were denied?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Sounds biased and unreliable...
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...and I've formulated a very strong opinion about both from personal experience.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)and many have organized criminal networks that can reach outside the confines of the prison walls: e.g., street gangs; 1% motorcycle clubs; whatever is left of LCN; white supremacist organizations, etc.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)You favor this?
dkf
(37,305 posts)If anything the job changes them because being soft is to lose control of the situation, which is dangerous.
Even teachers have to gain the ability to control their classroom.
Being nice from time to time works, but if you can't enforce your will, you are in trouble.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)dkf
(37,305 posts)What if they give you grief?
I can't imagine doing this job. I'm too soft and I'd get all walked over and I know it.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...there is a strong sense of order within the walls.
dkf
(37,305 posts)It's like Obama giving in on Susan Rice. You can't be seen as weak. Just like parenting...only these aren't innocent little kids.
I imagine in a prison you need to be just as tough or a little tougher than the people you are overseeing.
As I said, not an easy job.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Losing is not an option in many parts of the correctional system as it means you will get hurt or worse.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...there were good guards and bad guards. The good guards did their job PROFESSIONALLY. The bad ones got off on fucking with you.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Doing your job proffesionaly is no cure if they believe they have an in or a possible chance at gaining an advantage.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)The ones that DO target the good guards get fucked up by the other inmates.
My brother, retired Captain in the NYSDOC, told me that.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Use the situation to their advantage if its a guard who was respectful to them. You realise these guys will fuck over their brothers if it gives some advantage to them or their gang.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Economic injustice and lack of a decent upbringing.
I also know a LOT of cops and correction officers. Their underlying issue? A feeling of inferiority that they attempt to resolve by mistreating those under their supervision.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)but i wouldn't say ALWAYS.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)In that it just released the information with little to no context explaining the value of the information, leaving readers to their own biases.
Hard to argue, that.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Or if they even cared. I wouldnt be happy if my name and address was listed like this though i know the info can be found if one is really trying to find it.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...then, they should behave like human beings.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)F-ck the NRA and its apologists and shills.
Response to leveymg (Reply #28)
slackmaster This message was self-deleted by its author.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)And more paranoid.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)And frankly there are a handful of members with whom I would never want any personal contact.
But in all seriousness, and I really mean it, I've kept my address unlisted all of my adult life because I want to avoid contact with a schoolmate who was a bully. I suspect he still is. The guy is psychotic.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)And, I too have an old schoolmate who likes to play with guns and clubs and stuff, but fortunately nothing worse has come of that than defriending each other on Facebook.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)A seriously deranged person.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)Your profile says you're in San Diego, CA, and every title insurance company there has dozens of employees who could find you in less than five minutes, and it would leave zero trace on their computers.
Sorry, I worked in that business for over a quarter-century, and you'd be surprised just how much people can find out about you if they have access to the proper databases, and knowledge about how to search them. That said, the average criminal doesn't have either, and making things easy for bozos with grudges to attack corrections officers is irresponsible.
Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #99)
slackmaster This message was self-deleted by its author.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)As to who accessed data, if someone looks something up on a microfiche, how does that leave a trace? There are websites that let guest users log in to view property data, if someone did that from a library computer, it's absolutely untraceable as to who did it.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)In order to inspect a microfiche record, which would generally include property records and court proceedings earlier than about the mid 1990s, you have to go to the office in person. You present ID and fill out and sign and date a form before a clerk will physically get the fiche.
You are given access to a fiche reader that has copy capability. Charge is something like 5 cents per page.
You are on camera the whole time.
For newer property records, you can go on the county's Web site and search for document availability for free without identifying yourself. But if you want a copy, you have to make a payment, e.g. by credit card. Hard copies are mailed.
This applies to things like deeds, and also broader documents such as bond agreements and marriage licenses.
http://arcc.co.san-diego.ca.us/services/prop_assess_links.aspx
Here's Ernie, our Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk who is in charge of all of those records. His operation is run efficiently and effectively. I've always had good experiences dealing with them.
1
ETA there are secondary (commercial) sources for all of that information, but because THEY have to pay the county for the data they charge their customers for it as well. And of course they keep records of what they sell.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)its called opting out anyone in a high priority can and should have, appparently they didn't get the memo.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)on Maricopa County's website.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Some people have them vested in numbered trusts in order to keep their physical addresses secret.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)Hmmmm.....some people must really need to hide.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)People who stumbled into a lot of money and don't want to be hustled all the time, and people who are being stalked or have reason to believe that someone might want to do them harm.
blueamy66
(6,795 posts)Cause I may need to hide someday!
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)There are law firms that specialize in hiding people.
I have a friend who won a multimillion dollar lottery prize. Before he bought any property or did anything else that would create public records he went to such a firm. He once told me the cost. IIRC it was in excess of $10,000.
I used to work for a company that aggregates and sells public record data. I can tell you that my friend's name appears only in historic records for some property that he owned in the past. You would have to happen to know that he once earned that property for his name to come up in a history report, and that wouldn't tell you anything about what he owns now or where he lives.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)And that they don't wipe clean the memory of all inmates when they release them?
tradecenter
(133 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Partial smarts can be more dangerous than just plain dumb.
tradecenter
(133 posts)if the Journal hadn't been so irresponsible as to print names and address'. In my state, gun owners with CCW permits is blocked from all except law enforcement, as it should be, and we don't have to register our weapons, so no newspaper can out whoever owns weapons.
The fact is that what the Journal did may have been legal, but it was highly irresponsible to do.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Those name tags have nothing to do with the internet...
tradecenter
(133 posts)Why make it easier by printing their names and address' in a newspaper?
What that newspaper did may have been legal, but it was a highly irresponsible and dangerous thing to do.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)If a CO has been an asshole, their name being in the paper does not increase the chance of a comeuppance from someone they abused. They made their bed by acting unprofessionally.
tradecenter
(133 posts)If a prison guard is an asshole, then he's brought grief upon himself and someone with intent to hurt will find a way, I still think that what that newspaper did was totally irresponsible.
Thanks for the welcome.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)The abuser who gets arrested thinks the cop who arrested him is an asshole as is the da and the judge. Simply intercepting contraband puts you on the list. As is not allowing the prison gangs to dominate a block. The mentality amongst a lot of these guys is totally different than your average joe on the street.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...but keep watching "oz".
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Especially when dealing with prison gangs they have their own rules and codes of conduct.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)A lot of dept. Also teach about posting stuff on facebook. Regardless of what you think there is a danger for everyone in the criminal justice system due to the people who go through it.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Publication of gun-owners names in some newspaper does nothing to endanger prison guards - there are many ways to find out where a particular person lives, if you want to know badly enough - the argument made in the OP is just laughable, as are many of the answers on this thread.
tradecenter
(133 posts)That newspaper was irresponsible to print those names and address' and now it may very well backfire on them. NY now may make it illegal to release names of permit holders to anyone other than law enforcement and any hope of national registration may well have been scuttled by this dumbass stunt.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)once you are out on the street?
would you want them to deliver drugs to your house in uniform or something?
plus, you can't use commissary at home - so the prospect of threatening their family so you can get more money on your books is kinda moot once you are released.
pro tip: criminals generally fear/hate the police, so once they are out, they more than likely will avoid anything police related. until they get caught again. or something.
do you actually know any criminals or convicts?
tradecenter
(133 posts)Those prison computers are highly restricted and regulated and watched very carefully.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)jody
(26,624 posts)identify the many factors that make people high risk dangers to commit crime.
That's not too different from those who believe god create all things versus those who look to science to understand the laws of nature.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...he can get time on a typewriter.
tradecenter
(133 posts)My youngest son is a prison guard and the computers that prisoners are allowed to use are tightly restricted, regulated and watched by cameras.
B2G
(9,766 posts)it's when they get out.
Very true.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The knee-jerk, thoughtless rationalizations being spewed by the people who support the Journal News's actions are astonishingly shallow.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)"Is it right to report?". What harm can it do? This is part of that harm. When you put out the info like this, it's out. Those guards will now have to live with the thoughts like " Do I dare stop this guy from doing wrong to another inmate? He knows where I live." Or if during a search of a cell and the guards find drugs, the thought " Do I dare report this? He knows where I live."
What the Journal News did is bad reporting. They did what we are told never to do, report before thinking of the pro's and con's. This was not breaking news, they had time to think. Now it is those reporters that better be ready to live with what can happen, like guards getting hurt.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)The professors told us to put ourselves in the place of any person of whom we were considering taking a photo.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)We were directly responsible for returning a guilty verdict that landed the defendant in jail for 15+ years. My name and participation on that jury are part of the public record, and it would be a simple matter for a vengeful convict to have someone track me down.
I did nothing wrong by serving on the jury, and in doing so I committed no crime. Should this information be hidden from public knowledge?
hack89
(39,171 posts)but that being said, anonymous juries are common for organized crime cases so I suspect it is not clear cut what the answer is.
I just fail to see how posting a list of gun permit owners serves the community.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)In the several discussions I've had about it here on DU, the only arguments I've seen can be boiled down as follows:
1. The gun owner's right to privacy trumps all other considerations
2. The gun owner fears that the list will make him a target for burglary
Neither argument is persuasive IMO.
Even the current argument about prison guards is unconvincing, because a motivated prisoner could obtain the same information about the guards with little difficulty, especially if he had help from outside.
hack89
(39,171 posts)is the one involving women hiding from abusive ex-spouses.
There was no thought put into it - the paper posted the information to make a political point. Perhaps the answer is to create criteria and a process such that vulnerable people could be protected.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...NOT to make the information available.
But some peoples' hatred of gun owners is so strong they manage to rationalize it away.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)If the permit information is available publicly anyway, then I'd have to think that the abusive spouse could track it down in some fashion. Might not be easy, but such abusers are notorious for their determination. I have a good friend who's living more or less off the grid at this time because of an abusive ex, for instance.
If the list in the newspaper is a problem in this regard, then perhaps it's simply pointing out the underlying problem that this info is available to the abusers. Can that be changed? Can an exception be made for people who have a court-recognized need for this particular privacy?
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)That changed after a stalker looked up a vehicle registration to find the address of a young actress. He murdered her.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Schaeffer
Orrex
(63,172 posts)Even so, I'm not sure that this particular case is relevant here. There are at least 100,001 ways to track a person down, even if that person is actively working to hide his or her location. Hell, I hold an insurance license, so I am easily located on the public listings of at least three states. Other datapoints similarly subject citizens to public scrutiny, such as my aforementioned jury service, certain traffic violations, etc.
And if we're playing a numbers game, we also have to ask how many lives might be spared by the publication of a list of registered gun owners.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...Assumed to be zero. The Null Hypothesis that is the default answer to all questions in science regarding causes and effects.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)That time around, the argument was made that the publication of registered gun owners' names would necessarily make them more tempting targets for burglars. When I asked for evidence that this would be the case, the answer was that there was no evidence because it was a new phenomenon.
In the absence of information that suggests otherwise, the answer to that question must be assumed to be zero.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I think that is a real problem.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)Unfortunately, the officer's testimony is, in itself, insufficient.
Second, I have already pointed out that a determined convict can easily get his hands on this information regardless of whether or not the owner list is published.
So that leaves us at square one.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)There are ways of doing so - I know a few people whose locations are not discoverable in public record data at all.
I think people have an inherent right to keep their addresses private, even if they have served on a jury or have a pistol permit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Shaeffer
Orrex
(63,172 posts)If there are 100,000 ways to conceal one's address and identity, then there are at least 100,001 ways to find them out.
In any case, celebrities aren't a useful example in this discussion, because their job by its very nature puts them in the public eye, and Ms Shaeffer was killed before we had anything like the modern internet, so a search that wouldn't have been possible in 1989 would be easy today.
mike_c
(36,269 posts)Problem solved.
hack89
(39,171 posts)problem solved.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...to work against registration.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)mike_c
(36,269 posts)The newspaper in my county did this four years ago, in 2008-- not an interactive map, which was likely beyond their abilities, just the names and addresses of all registered gun owners in Humboldt County. Nothing dire happened. Nothing. And like the current instance, gun owners howled at the "irresponsibility" of doing such a thing.
Nonetheless, that article sparked a conversation about guns in our community. I don't know that it changed anything, but I do know that having the conversation is better than not, and I also know that nothing bad came of it. This is a very rural county, and it turns out there are LOTS of registered guns here, and given that marijuana cultivation is the backbone of the county economy, I presume there are even more unpermitted guns than registered ones.
In any event I'm speaking from some experience, since this already happened in my community and the only outcomes, to the extent that I can see any, were mostly positive as far as I can tell. None of the dire predictions came to pass.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)It galvanized gun owners to fight tooth and nail against registration and licensing, which I regard as a good thing.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)not in favor of what the Journal News did. But if you need to remain anonymous and such, you should avoid doing things that require public registration. Gun ownership is one of those things.