General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWelcome To The Reagan Revolution Economy -- 50+ And You Are Out Of A Job Permanently
the rest of your career will be at Walmart or other low paying big box. And you will have to wait until 67 to get your Social Security if the GOP gets its way. Why stop there, what about 70.
Lionessa
(3,894 posts)Seems most pols and all branches of gov't are determined to make it as you present it.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)in English it was "old men looking out windows" or something like that.
In Spain UE is over 20%.
Greece? Forget it.
many others too
subterranean
(3,427 posts)as does anyone born after 1960. If the Republicans get their way, I'll have to wait that long for Medicare too.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Then the likes of Bain Capital came along and bought the company. Oh, guess what, they found lots of money put away for retirement. They took it, now no retirement, now you will need to accept even less money, then, the company is suddenly going bankrupt, have to move the factory to China, before you leave you have to train your replacements. Can't get another job except for minimum wage, too bad so sad. Now our Congress wants to lower your Social Security. Just die.
KG
(28,751 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)Union busting and on and on.
I was in law school during his first term. Fat lotta good it did me as far as getting a job. And I was 30 years younger then!!
DearHeart
(692 posts)TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)corporate America sees as the age of a worker becoming a burden.
DearHeart
(692 posts)Nice to know that now I'm a "burden" to prospective employers!
Thanks for the info!
R B Garr
(16,950 posts)My thoughts are that younger workers, women especially, that are of child bearing age would be the most perceived "liability" to corporate america. There is a lot of missed time due to young family obligations. I guess by liability, the older workers want to be paid more based on experience...? Or is it health benefits? Even then, the younger workers starting families cost corporations with health benefits way more than normally healthy older workers would. I must be missing something.