General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShould the names and address' of police officers, judges, corrections officers, etc be public record
and allowed to be published?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)And neither should the names of registered gun owners or permit holders.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)In fact, all names and addresses of property owners are a matter of public record in EVERY state.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)but, those property records don't disclose that the person owns firearms or if they have a license, nor do they disclose if the home owner is a police officer, judge, corrections officer, etc.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)Gun ownership has consequences.
IMO, this just demonstrates how cowardly some gun owners truly are.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)more guns out on the streets and in the hands of criminals if thieves were to use those records as a shopping list and break into those homes.
Do you really want more guns on the street and in the hands of criminals?
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)I, for one, applaud such actions. Parents will know which homes their children should never EVER go to regardless of whther or not they are friends with the children living in such a dangerous home.
Far more likely to save a child's life than for a thief to use the list for a "shopping list". The very idea that this is what will come of it is the height of paranoia and demonstrates the person displaying such paranoia might possibly be unfit to own a gun, IMO.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)and lives in a world of fear.
And people have the nerve to call gun owners crazy.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)It is a fact that children are more likely to die from gunshot wounds in homes where guns are present. Knowing that a home has guns is one way to keep your children out of that home and thus less likely to die from a gunshot wound.
So deal with it. I hope this goes viral and every last gun owner in America is outed this way.
Coyote_Tan
(194 posts)... pets, stairs, pools, cleaning supplies, knives, cars, other adults, other children or any of the 1000 other ways someone can die?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)If you refuse to discuss regulation, you're probably a nut.
If you refuse to discuss registration, you're probably a nut.
If you say we should ban knives, cars, pools, dogs, forks, etc because they 'kill more people' than guns, you're probably a nut.
If you think this OP is a fair equivalent, you're probably a nut.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)...home addresses.
In 1989 Rebecca Shaeffer was murdered by a stalker who got her address from the California DMV.
Maybe it's time for states to make it a little harder for personal information about citizens to be released wholesale to anyone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_Schaeffer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Driver%27s_Privacy_Protection_Act
-..__...
(7,776 posts)Up until 20-25 years ago, a resident of MA could go to the DMV and look up the plate number and registration info of any vehicle.
There wasn't even a clerk or present. The records/info were kept in volumes of bound old 80 column dot-matrix paper. Anyone could look up names, address' with no questions asked.
Nowadays, even a police officer can't run plate numbers without justification (take that for what it's worth).
Every inquiry is recorded and any cop found to be abusing the system could face disciplinary action.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)
790.335?Prohibition of registration of firearms; electronic records.
(1)?LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND INTENT.
(a)?The Legislature finds and declares that:
1.?The right of individuals to keep and bear arms is guaranteed under both the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and s. 8, Art. I of the State Constitution.
2.?A list, record, or registry of legally owned firearms or law-abiding firearm owners is not a law enforcement tool and can become an instrument for profiling, harassing, or abusing law-abiding citizens based on their choice to own a firearm and exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the United States Constitution. Further, such a list, record, or registry has the potential to fall into the wrong hands and become a shopping list for thieves.
3.?A list, record, or registry of legally owned firearms or law-abiding firearm owners is not a tool for fighting terrorism, but rather is an instrument that can be used as a means to profile innocent citizens and to harass and abuse American citizens based solely on their choice to own firearms and exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the United States Constitution.
4.?Law-abiding firearm owners whose names have been illegally recorded in a list, record, or registry are entitled to redress.
http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?app_mode=display_statute&url=0700-0799/0790/0790.html
The above sums up my views on gun registration and if you wish to call me a coward because I hold these views then I will take no offense. Nor will I bother to insult you in return.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)You also have the right to call Florida a "fucked up state." There are a lot of "fucked up states" in our nation. Fortunately we have a choice where we chose to live. Florida is far from perfect but in my opinion it is far better place to live in than northern Ohio smack dab in the middle of the snow belt. I grew up there.
Your decision and your insult doesn't bother me in the least.
It's a beautiful sunny day here in north Florida but it is slightly chilly at 68 degrees. I might decide to put on a light jacket if I go somewhere which is somewhat unusual.
LooseWilly
(4,477 posts)... their addresses, however, are Not Public Record. -Well, unless they have to register firearms, I guess...
Should they be? Sure... as public employees there should be open accountability of who taxpayers are employing.
If, on the other hand, you want to make their info Private- you damn sure better do the same for teachers, transportation workers, garbage men, park workers, social workers, etc.
djg21
(1,803 posts)Public employment and salary are public record. Home addresses and contact information generally are not and should not be, especially for law enforcement, judicial employees, corrections staff, and others involved in criminal justice. Those persons, and their families, can quickly become targets for harassment or worse if their addresses are disclosed.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)-..__...
(7,776 posts)Favorite forum: General Discussion, 164 posts in the last 90 days (57% of total posts)
Favorite group: Gun Control & RKBA, 58 posts in the last 90 days (20% of total posts)
Last post: Wed Dec 26, 2012, 12:54 PM
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)OneTenthofOnePercent
(6,268 posts)Don't be so willfully ignorant.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)my point exactly.
Response to CreekDog (Reply #7)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
-..__...
(7,776 posts)you need to pay closer attention to these things.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021856648#post29
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021856648#post96
Response to -..__... (Reply #20)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)i never said you didn't post in GD, just that it's rare, generally only related to guns --or if it's not --to post from the right to oppose or cause concern for any major issue the Democrats are supporting.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002471753
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Bless your little heart. It's adorable how you simply are unable to see how desperately absurd you appear in this thread.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I also don't support printing names of assault weapons owners, public toters, etc., rigth NOW.
However, I would not be opposed to setting a date in the future to allow those anti-societal gun owners (owners of assault type weapons, public toters, etc.) to get rid of such weapons before names are printed, available on-line, etc.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,175 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)you can also get pension records and salaries too.
Response to -..__... (Original post)
devilgrrl This message was self-deleted by its author.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)*By "this idea" I am clearly referring to the one your OP is mocking.
spin
(17,493 posts)I do store my firearms in a safe but a locksmith once told me that a knowledgeable thief can defeat any gun safe made given a reasonable amount of time.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Next shit stirring thread
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Or do you want government to retain the right to operate in total secrecy based on whatever reason they can cook up?
I can look online to see the name and salary of every person employed by my city and county.
Address searches after that are just as simple, they are all part of the public record.
If someone wants to post that information, what does it really matter if it is all readily available and in the public already?
elleng
(130,865 posts)And what's 'etc?'
Whovian
(2,866 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)I believe Police Offices may be public record. Don't know about corrections officers. Teachers and administration are of public record. Just look at any ps web site and you will most of the teachers and staff listed.
Floyd_Gondolli
(1,277 posts)I'm not seeing the problem here.
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)It doesn't matter. If you want the address of anyone and you know how to use the software you can look up anyone's home address the in tax collectors office by name. Its a backdoor way of getting past specific public records privacy exemptions. The tax roll itself is a public document unadulterated in most states. That's why some judges put their residence ownership in a trust
If I was a cop I would do the same.