HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » SOPA, its upcoming sequel...

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 12:45 AM

SOPA, its upcoming sequels, and Ken Russell's "The Devils" (SPOILER ALERT)

Last edited Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:19 AM - Edit history (1)

The British Film Institute (BFI) announced back in November its plans to release Ken Russell's 1971 film "The Devils" on DVD in March 2012.

The film's owner, Warner Brothers (WB), has agreed to allow BFI to release the film in its original, X-rated theatrical format. Vanessa Redgrave and Oliver Reed are the principal actors in what is generally regarded as, if not THE most, then certainly one of the most controversial films produced by a major studio in the last half-century.

To obtain even an X rating, which in 1971 meant merely "adults only" (the porn industry later hijacked the X rating during its "golden age" with films like "Deep Throat" and "Devil in Miss Jones", the film was mercilessly edited to appease the same censors who gave a pass to Stanley Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" and Sam Peckinpah's "Straw Dogs," two equally graphic and shocking films, that same year. Upon release, "The Devils" was promptly banned in several countries including Italy, whose National Syndicate of Film Journalists nevertheless gave Russell the nod for Best Director.

"The Devils" features plenty of graphic sex and violence in its story of a priest in 17th century France, Father Grandier (Reed), who makes the ultimate sacrifice in defending the city of Loudon against tyranny while exposing the political/religious machine bent on subjugating the city. Every second Vanessa Redgrave is on the screen, playing the nun who is obsessed with Grandier and is (literally) used to bring him down, inspires soul-wracking levels of discomfort.

Anyone familiar with the film's history knows that WB has spent the last 40 years attempting to remove nearly every trace of "The Devils" from everyone's memory. The studio hacked every single American copy of the film down to an R rating and destroyed all of the objectionable footage(1). They have promised DVD releases in the past, then reneged at the last minute(2). The upcoming BFI release, if it actually happens, is still missing some key scenes, all of which still miraculously exist.

The most infamous scene that will remain out of official release is known to Russell fans as the "Rape of Christ" scene, in which a group of nuns who are pretending to be demonically possessed, granted a temporary license to get their groove on in exchange, defile a statue of Jesus, providing the film's menacing authority figures with a distraction big enough for them to quietly carry out savage and oppressive acts in His name that defile Him far more than any sex show possibly could. This scene is apparently still unsuitable for human consumption 40 years after the fact even though WB deemed it appropriate to let slide a scene in which a statue of the Virgin Mary gets equipped with a blood-encrusted phallus in 1973 when they released William Friedkin's "The Exorcist."

Another missing scene involves Redgrave's character, Sister Jeanne, masturbating with Grandier's charred femur after he is burned at the stake. Take my word for it: in the arc of her character's storyline, her actions are totally believable and not at all gratuitous. The scene, while totally bizarre, is not graphic in any way and completes Jeanne's story of unrequited love. It was deemed inappropriate even though Francis Coppola's 1974 film "The Godfather Part II" contains a scene in which a prostitute has obviously been murdered by the insertion of an unspecified weapon into her vagina.

Why is WB so afraid of "The Devils", even in its toned down form?

Because it contains unflinching commentary on organized religion in general, specifically Catholicism?

Because the church officials in it are depicted as ruthless, power-hungry sadists who brazenly meddle in politics and perpetrate a colossal hoax upon the people, only to be publicly made fools of by their king?

Because the film's hero is arrested, tortured, has his legs smashed by a hammer-wielding inquisitor and is burned alive with the intent of getting him to publicly admit he was wrong to defy authority, but he never does? -- I'm aware that this happened at the end of "Braveheart," but in that film, William Wallace's life and death were glamorized and Mel Gibson gets to mug and scream "Freedom," a word that no longer has any meaning, at the top of his lungs while Grandier offers an ironic parting shot ("I apologize for defending your city" and suffers a visually stunning and horrifying fate.

What does this have to do with SOPA?

It is still possible to watch "The Devils" in the form Ken Russell intended... but it's difficult and also illegal. WB has effectively squashed this film and diluted any message it might contain. If the March release actually occurs, they will be patting themselves on the back for "unearthing" this "lost classic," but they sure as shit don't want anyone watching the real version. Technology, for now, allows us to circumvent WB's arbitrary blockade.

SOPA is intended to suppress information on the Internet. It is intended to keep people divided. This article describes only one way it will accomplish this... and accomplish it will. SOPA may have been defeated today, but the interests who have invested over $100 million into it are going to bring it back again. And again. And again until it passes...

...or until our existing system of pay-to-play justice is replaced. To do that, we must all lose our fear of suffering a fate similar to Grandier's, because these people will start bringing the violence if we continue to scare them.

Article about upcoming BFI release: http://twitchfilm.com/news/2011/11/ken-russells-notorious-the-devils-coming-from-bfi-dvd-in-2012.php

Wikipedia - The Devils: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devils_(film)

(1) http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/markkermode/2011/11/better_the_devils_you_know.html
(2) http://www.dvdactive.com/news/releases/the-devils.html

17 replies, 4549 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply SOPA, its upcoming sequels, and Ken Russell's "The Devils" (SPOILER ALERT) (Original post)
dogknob Jan 2012 OP
napoleon_in_rags Jan 2012 #1
msongs Jan 2012 #2
yoyossarian Jan 2012 #3
villager Jan 2012 #4
dogknob Jan 2012 #7
villager Jan 2012 #14
cliffordu Jan 2012 #5
dogknob Jan 2012 #6
Surya Gayatri Jan 2012 #8
dogknob Jan 2012 #9
blogslut Jan 2012 #10
dogknob Jan 2012 #11
blogslut Jan 2012 #12
villager Jan 2012 #15
blogslut Jan 2012 #16
dogknob Jan 2012 #17
dogknob Jan 2012 #13

Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 12:53 AM

1. Wow, great post.

That cuts to the heart of the matter right there: When you have censorship in the name of IP protection, it goes hand in hand with censorship in the name of other things. That alone is reason to resist SOPA.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:20 AM

2. i remember seeing that flick, very intense whatever the version was we saw. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:24 AM

3. Interesting thematic juxtapositions...

...and I don't say that to just anyone.

The Devils is the scariest film I've ever seen. It's wonderful.
Ken Russell is a titan. A cinematic god who has been TAKEN UP!
I worship him. I really do.
K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:01 AM

4. The film remains in my "personal top ten." I have a "restored" British TV version on disc

 

...that I haven't looked at in awhile. Been meaning to since Russell passed.

Warners has been terrified of the film for a very long time...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to villager (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 03:08 AM

7. Is that the one with the Mark Kermode documentary attached?

Some of the excised scenes appear in that doc, but the film itself is basically the R version.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Reply #7)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:00 PM

14. it's the Channel 4 restoration -- and it was much "harder" than my memories of having seen...

 

...the "R" version, but that was admittedly awhile before obtaining this particular disc.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:06 AM

5. Shit.

Where can I see the original??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to cliffordu (Reply #5)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:09 AM

6. I am not at liberty to say here.

... but I'm pretty sure that the media companies backing SOPA have some software you can download that can help.

You might want to watch this informational video first:

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 05:44 AM

8. Wonderfully informative post, dogknob...

 

I remember "The Devils" very well--some of the scenes you describe are etched in my mind forever. I was fortunate to see it in France, where Ken Russell is practically a cult figure.

Of course, it caused much controversy at the time (this being an historically Catholic country). But, the French love for cinema carried the day and it was left largely intact.

Let's hope the BFI do carry through and re-issue it on DVD. I consider it one of Russell's masterpieces.

SG

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Surya Gayatri (Reply #8)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 01:50 PM

9. BFI's release will still be incomplete...

Based on what I read, while writing the OP, one would still need to resort to... alternative means to watch the complete version.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:09 PM

10. Just to add

The film is based on both a non-fiction novel by Aldous Huxley and a stage play written by John Whiting.

The subject matter is pretty mind-blowing with or without the graphic sex.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blogslut (Reply #10)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:19 PM

11. Yeah, Whitings play enjoyed a fair amount of controversy.

...and it wasn't even "Russell-ed up."

WB, by excising scenes from the BFI release, wants to obfuscate the meaning of the film in the hope that it will get buried by a public who can't figure it out.

Given the average intellectual level of our current culture, we'll probably reject it anyway.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Reply #11)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 02:21 PM

12. Well, all I know is the play

It's a hell of a thing. Next to Marat/Sade, it's the most amazing piece of theater I've ever experienced.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blogslut (Reply #12)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 06:02 PM

15. would love to see the play... directed a brief cutting from it in college

 

...for a directing class. Always hoped to the whole thing for a thesis project, but could never get it off the ground.

Most American rep theaters seem never to have heard of it, though...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to villager (Reply #15)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:59 PM

16. I auditioned for the priest's lover

Lost out because my physicality was too similar to woman that was cast as the hunchback nun.

When I saw the production, I was all kinds of sad because it was so wonderfully staged. It was a renegade production held in a warehouse-type bar, back in the 80's. The character of Louis XIII made his entrance with two half-naked male dancers and stuff like that. It was awesome.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to blogslut (Reply #16)

Tue Jan 24, 2012, 02:10 AM

17. Lucky.

I got to see Witkiewicz's "The Madman and the Nun" at UCSD. That was friggin' hea-vy!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to dogknob (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 04:56 PM

13. Oops.

While I was looking for my umbrella (just in case any of Santorum's C.U.M. gets mixed in with the rain today in Orange County), I "found" a version of "The Devils" that claims to be uncut. It isn't. The "Rape of Christ" is intact, but the femur scene cuts just when Redgrave is about to pick up the bone.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread