General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMany members are working hard here to come up with common sense gun control measures
I wish our politicians worked this hard for common sense gun control
instead of knee jerk reactions. And bills that accomplish nothing but pander.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)I can't comment on the "working-hard", but I can comment on the proposals
Can we be honest- Most of the proposals that are proposed are non-starters. Whether they are good in theory is irrelevant if they wouldn't even be able to become law. Good proposals don't include things like "taxing ammo 100000%", because we all know that isn't going to happen. My own theory is that many posters get some enjoyment out of making ridiculous suggestions. I have some friends that do that as well- I don't get it.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)but there's been a few good ideas floated around.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)I find the majority of the posts contain either repealing the 2nd amendment, or taxing ammunition out of existence
former-republican
(2,163 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ways to discourage prurient gun behaviour so prevalent today.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)I'm saying they won't work in reality because they will never be passed.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Life and death issue that's been played footsie with for decades now and a lot of us don't think that anything will happen this time, what's the point of being completely serious?
It's not like what we do here has that much effect on the real world although Google trawls DU pretty hard.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)I just feel (and this is my opinion only) that when you start going down that road you almost guarantee your failure.
I'll be honest- I'm generally pro-gun but I think we need to do something to stop these shootings- what that is, I don't know. I have a few ideas myself. What scares me more is that these types of attitudes will spread beyong this forum and turn this "Great gun debate" into nothing more than soundbite talking points being slung by one talking head at the other.
It could just be a pet peeve of mine and I could be out of line with this. I don't know.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Compromise means coming up somewhere in the middle, if you start already half way to the other side's position your final compromise will not be optimum.
At least that's the way I see it, if you want something reasonable as a final compromise you have to start out at least somewhat unreasonable.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)unreasonable yes, completely off the spectrum no.
I just see the proposals here and they aren't just unreasonable, they are off the spectrum.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Have you seen anything here on DU remotely as unhinged as this proposal?
And bear in mind this woman is a paid conservative writer, a professional, not some blog commenter.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12/17/there-s-little-we-can-do-to-prevent-another-massacre.html
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)President Obama was workin' on it today.
President Obama held talks with Biden, Cabinet members on Newtown response
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022014240
former-republican
(2,163 posts)Holder would know about it "sure"
I just don't like the guy. I wish Obama would replace him.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Duncan = Education/Schools
Sebelius = Health/Mental Health
Holder = Justice/Guns
An all around approach will be needed, it's not only about gun control.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)WastedSaint
(53 posts)former-republican
(2,163 posts)Before I was a member here.
BATF isn't set up for that .
The agency would have to triple in force and then some.
WastedSaint
(53 posts)happen. I'd be happy to give my tax dollars to them for this piece of mind.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)bossy22
(3,547 posts)BATFE has enough on their plate already. The organization is in shambles (can't even get a true director). Do you really want to put your faith in such an organization
plus again- its not going to pass congress so why bother