Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wicked Blue

(8,114 posts)
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:30 PM Jan 2025

FAA Added More Flights to Reagan Airport Despite Collision Warnings

Newsweek
Published Jan 30, 2025 at 6:49 AM EST

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved additional flights at Reagan National Airport months before a collision between an American Airlines plane and a military helicopter in Washington D.C. on Wednesday that killed at least 19 people.

Before the additional flights were approved, Senator Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, warned that the increase could heighten the risk of accidents.

***(snip)

Wednesday's collision was the first major U.S. commercial air crash since February 2009. Following the incident, which killed at least 19 people, questions have been raised over what caused it and if it could have been prevented.

In May 2024, an FAA reauthorization bill added five slots to Reagan Airport's daily schedule.

https://www.newsweek.com/reagan-airport-more-flights-collision-warning-2023389

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FAA Added More Flights to Reagan Airport Despite Collision Warnings (Original Post) Wicked Blue Jan 2025 OP
Kaine was prescient! From the same article: Dennis Donovan Jan 2025 #1
Thank you for adding this nt Wicked Blue Jan 2025 #2
Tim isn't holding back underpants Jan 2025 #3
I don't understand why they need to run training flights in this area Renew Deal Jan 2025 #4
If this was a helicopter for VIP's then training does not quite pass the smell test. PurgedVoter Jan 2025 #10
So are you saying they are hiding victims? Renew Deal Jan 2025 #11
One way to interpret the comment is that the helicopter was COMING karynnj Jan 2025 #12
It was reported as an "annual proficiency training flight." Renew Deal Jan 2025 #13
No. I had not read that. karynnj Jan 2025 #16
I did not claim to know anything PurgedVoter Jan 2025 #31
+1 dalton99a Jan 2025 #18
People rationalize each decision with "this doesn't change the risk much if at all" RockRaven Jan 2025 #5
My impression as a passenger was that it was the most congested airport of all my travels wishstar Jan 2025 #6
And the approach is like landing on an aircraft carrier! NCDem47 Jan 2025 #7
I hate to say it, but I think Biden owns this as much as Trump. intheflow Jan 2025 #8
Yes, the daily capacity was increased by five round-trip flights. n/t John1956PA Jan 2025 #9
Disagree. It's not Biden's job to veto an FAA reauthorization act. lostnfound Jan 2025 #14
Post removed Post removed Jan 2025 #17
President Obama vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 Jose Garcia Jan 2025 #32
Nope, Enron Musk first head of FAA ... uponit7771 Jan 2025 #15
Musk didn't fire anyone. intheflow Jan 2025 #19
same effect, Enron Musk was involved with the US having no head of FAA ... I'm not removing his name from the issue caus uponit7771 Jan 2025 #20
He did fire him in an indirect way because he knew that Been A Dick Donald had his back, MarineCombatEngineer Jan 2025 #21
Plenty of blame to go around but B.See Jan 2025 #27
Pete strongly disagrees. yardwork Jan 2025 #23
Yes, I saw that Lulu KC Jan 2025 #24
Kinda what I am thinking as well DetroitLegalBeagle Jan 2025 #25
That's my thought Lulu KC Jan 2025 #26
In MAGA'S alternate reality, anything B.See Jan 2025 #28
Yup Lulu KC Jan 2025 #29
It gets his rabid LEMMINGS looking B.See Jan 2025 #30
Pete says nope. yardwork Jan 2025 #22

Dennis Donovan

(31,059 posts)
1. Kaine was prescient! From the same article:
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:36 PM
Jan 2025
/snip/

As Congress considered the bill, Kaine warned of the potential for collisions if more flights were approved for the already overburdened airport.

"God forbid waking up and looking in a mirror one day and say, 'Wow, I was warned. I was warned and I shouldn't have done this,'" Kaine told reporters last year.

"You're going to do it to convenience a few dozen members [of Congress] (...) at the expense of everybody who lives around this airport who would potentially be victimized if there was some kind of a collision," Kaine continued.

"You're also increasing a safety risk because when you have one plane taking off or landing every minute, while other planes are circling, especially in very constricted air space, like DC's airspace, you run the risk of serious challenge. When you hear an air traffic controller having to shout 'stop, stop' to get two jets trying to use this main runway to stop within 300 feet of each other. This is a flashing, red warning sign telling everyone that this airport is already overburdened and you shouldn't do more."

But despite Kaine's concerns, the bill received bipartisan support and was signed into law.

/snip

underpants

(191,398 posts)
3. Tim isn't holding back
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:40 PM
Jan 2025

Not that he ever really did. He laid it all out the other night about the resignation offer from Trump.

Renew Deal

(84,252 posts)
4. I don't understand why they need to run training flights in this area
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:42 PM
Jan 2025

I know the area is militarily important but it seems avoidable.

PurgedVoter

(2,541 posts)
10. If this was a helicopter for VIP's then training does not quite pass the smell test.
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 03:12 PM
Jan 2025

The nature of the helicopter seems to have shifted several times. This could always be reporters or the chaos of early reporting, but the military generally knows what a military vehicle is.

My wild guess, is that if it is a VIP helicopter someone loud wanted to go somewhere and wanted the helicopter to show up faster than ASAP. A screaming self important fascist not wanting to wait seems likely enough to me.

I only know a little more than Trump does in this case. The reason I say I know more than Trump does is that I am not surrounded by yes men and I am capable of listening and reading.

Renew Deal

(84,252 posts)
11. So are you saying they are hiding victims?
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 03:20 PM
Jan 2025

The military said last night that there were no VIP's and only 3 soldiers. You claim to know more. Were they lying? Can you prove it?

karynnj

(60,394 posts)
12. One way to interpret the comment is that the helicopter was COMING
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 03:28 PM
Jan 2025

to take the VIP somewhere before it crashed.

I know nothing about helicopters, planes or air traffic control.

Renew Deal

(84,252 posts)
13. It was reported as an "annual proficiency training flight."
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 04:13 PM
Jan 2025
The Black Hawk helicopter that collided with a passenger plane on Wednesday night was on an annual proficiency training flight, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said on Thursday.

The Pentagon is withholding names and ranks of the crew members until next of kin are notified, Hegseth said, but “it was a fairly experienced crew that was doing an annual required night evaluation. They did have night vision goggles.”

https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/plane-crash-dca-potomac-washington-dc-01-29-25#cm6jfxufg00003b6mqrv57zrj


Are you saying that they're lying?

PurgedVoter

(2,541 posts)
31. I did not claim to know anything
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 10:04 PM
Jan 2025

I also did not say that VIP's were on the plane. Read it again and seriously chill out. I don't know anything yet, I was reacting to statements that seemed contradictory as they came out.

The current explanation was this was a routine test. That seems okay but it still leads to my current question.

My current question is, "Why was the helicopter in the direct path where civilian flights land and take off?"

In my past experience from being on planes and driving past airports, these paths are very well marked. From my tiny experience flying and being in private planes, typically, no one is cleared for those areas unless they are given direct and specific instructions allowing them to.

RockRaven

(17,611 posts)
5. People rationalize each decision with "this doesn't change the risk much if at all"
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:52 PM
Jan 2025

while ignoring hundreds of other such decisions have already been made, and the avoidable danger really adds up fast.

wishstar

(5,728 posts)
6. My impression as a passenger was that it was the most congested airport of all my travels
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 02:56 PM
Jan 2025

and I only flew through there twice over 10 years ago but it made a lasting impression of having too many flights and passengers crammed close together in too small of a space. Can't imagine how much worse it is now with huge traffic uptick since Covid eased.

NCDem47

(2,912 posts)
7. And the approach is like landing on an aircraft carrier!
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 03:01 PM
Jan 2025

Tight low turns onto a short runway. It's a ride.

intheflow

(29,618 posts)
8. I hate to say it, but I think Biden owns this as much as Trump.
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 03:06 PM
Jan 2025

Trump fired FAA investigators but Biden signed the order allowing more planes in an already tight airspace, with the support of more Democratic congress members than Republican. That had much more of an impact on day to day operations than firing people whose job is to investigate accidents after they happen.

List of people who voted for adding flights here: https://www.newsweek.com/lawmakers-voted-increase-flights-reagan-airport-crash-2023484

Edited to add, I’d be delighted to learn that it’s more about Trump’s actions, if it turns out to be true. I’m just voicing an opinion in the void at this point.

lostnfound

(17,079 posts)
14. Disagree. It's not Biden's job to veto an FAA reauthorization act.
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 04:15 PM
Jan 2025

Hard enough just getting congress to fund the government.

Response to lostnfound (Reply #14)

intheflow

(29,618 posts)
19. Musk didn't fire anyone.
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 04:31 PM
Jan 2025

He threatened to have the guy fired and the guy quit. Meanwhile, you seem to think the head of the FAA sits in all the air traffic control towers at every airport personally overseeing all the air traffic controllers? Even if he was still in place, he would have been home when this happened.

If it turns out they had fewer air traffic controllers because of Trump’s hiring freeze, that’s different. Otherwise, it was an accident that was forewarned for years due to excessive air traffic, a warning that many Dems brushed off as inconvenient or innocuous (“It’s only 5 more flights a day…”). This was an equal opportunity accident with plenty of blame to go around.

uponit7771

(93,072 posts)
20. same effect, Enron Musk was involved with the US having no head of FAA ... I'm not removing his name from the issue caus
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 04:42 PM
Jan 2025

... of semantics

MarineCombatEngineer

(15,862 posts)
21. He did fire him in an indirect way because he knew that Been A Dick Donald had his back,
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 04:50 PM
Jan 2025

so your assertion that he didn't fire him falls flat on it's face.

Lulu KC

(8,161 posts)
24. Yes, I saw that
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 06:23 PM
Jan 2025

But from the info officials have released so far, it does not seem to be related to a traffic jam of planes. I have heard the following, which I am taking as factual:
1. Air traffic controller was doing job of two people. (Thank you, Ronald Reagan.)
2. ATC directed helicopter to go behind the American jet.
3. ATC also gave jet last minute direction to change landing strip--but the result of that isn't clear. Was it too late to change direction, and was the helicopter already in its path?
4. Helicopter was a training flight with "fairly experienced pilots."

I am seeing the approval of more flights into DCA as being a related but not directly responsible reason for this crash.

Just my two cents.

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,406 posts)
25. Kinda what I am thinking as well
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 06:50 PM
Jan 2025

The root cause will likely be what it is for most aviation accidents, pilot error. Whether its the jet's or the helicopter's, i don't know. But my assumption is the helicopter's.

Lulu KC

(8,161 posts)
26. That's my thought
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 07:18 PM
Jan 2025

I am so hoping it was not the woman who was one of the helicopter pilots or a person of color, but since DT will be blaming “DEI” no matter what happens, it doesn’t matter in the world of craziness.

I saw some newly appointed (by DT) guy saying they are thinking of moving training exercises out of the DCA flight path. An actual genius, relatively speaking!

B.See

(5,828 posts)
28. In MAGA'S alternate reality, anything
Thu Jan 30, 2025, 08:07 PM
Jan 2025

going wrong is because of DEI (translation: Black people, women, and anyone else NOT a white male.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FAA Added More Flights to...