Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 02:47 PM Nov 24

House Passes $196 Billion Social Security Bill: Will Repealing Pension Reductions Shorten The Program's Lifespan?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/house-passes-196-billion-social-161533489.html

I don't understand this story. They are reducing benefits, but it's supposed to increase the deficit? It makes no sense!
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Passes $196 Billion Social Security Bill: Will Repealing Pension Reductions Shorten The Program's Lifespan? (Original Post) LymphocyteLover Nov 24 OP
They are increasing benefits marybourg Nov 24 #1
I see. I didn't read it carefully enough. I thought they were adding those provisions LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #15
Constituent pressure. marybourg Nov 24 #20
They are increasing benefits for some public sector retirees MichMan Nov 24 #2
Thanks yes. I didn't read it carefully and thought they were reducing the benefits LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #16
It means those on gov't or public pensions will get more from social security CousinIT Nov 24 #3
IMO the article implied the other way around and I'm not sure why Repubs would agree to this LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #11
Why were some government employees exempt from contributing to SS in the first place? MichMan Nov 24 #4
Because we have DCPs that replace SS. Igel Nov 24 #5
No one should be exempted from SS taxes MichMan Nov 24 #7
Public service employees, with their pensions, marybourg Nov 24 #8
they can though LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #13
I never heard anyone ever say that private sector employees can opt out of FICA taxes as long as they have a pension. MichMan Nov 24 #14
My mom was in the teacher's union and their contract said they would get a pension LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Nov 24 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author marybourg Nov 24 #21
My mom was a teacher and has a generous pension and never contributed to SS LymphocyteLover Nov 24 #12
Rare that I agree with anyone from the Cato Institute bucolic_frolic Nov 24 #6
Too scared to read XanaDUer2 Nov 24 #9
If Trump is told a family member of his invented SSI and somebody stole the idea... GreenWave Nov 24 #10
This has nothing to do with SSI, which is a program for low-income. marybourg Nov 24 #22
The worst that can happen. Jacson6 Nov 24 #19

marybourg

(13,247 posts)
1. They are increasing benefits
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 02:51 PM
Nov 24

to public sector employees whose benefits were previously reduced because of their government pensions, therefore, total payouts are increased.

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
15. I see. I didn't read it carefully enough. I thought they were adding those provisions
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:15 PM
Nov 24

not eliminating them. I guess I was surprised that increasing benefits would be a bipartisan thing. Also I don't get the rationale for doing this.

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
16. Thanks yes. I didn't read it carefully and thought they were reducing the benefits
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:16 PM
Nov 24

I'm not sure what the rationale for this is and I was surprised GOPers are increasing benefits.

CousinIT

(10,679 posts)
3. It means those on gov't or public pensions will get more from social security
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 02:53 PM
Nov 24

Previously, they got their pension and greatly reduced (or no, I'm not sure) social security. That policy would be ended.

It will take more money from the SOC Security Trust Fund, thus pushing it closer to a depletion state, where it will be unable to pay full benefits. Due to Trump's policies, this is expected now to be in 2031 or 2032 and retirees on social security will see a 30-33% reduction in their monthly benefit at that time - unless Congress does something to avoid it (I wouldn't count on that).

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
11. IMO the article implied the other way around and I'm not sure why Repubs would agree to this
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:06 PM
Nov 24

unless the want to accelerate a SS shortfall

Igel

(36,414 posts)
5. Because we have DCPs that replace SS.
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 02:58 PM
Nov 24

The problem is that very often if you work for 40 years at one job or in the private sector, you get social security and nothing else.

If you work for 10 years in the private sector and then become a teacher for 30 years, you can claim both.

My teacher pension isn't inflation adjusted. It's an annuity.

Inflation was going to force me to postpone retirement by a year, until I was 67. Now it looks like I'll be 68.

MichMan

(13,831 posts)
7. No one should be exempted from SS taxes
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 03:05 PM
Nov 24

People in private employment aren't permitted to opt out.

marybourg

(13,247 posts)
8. Public service employees, with their pensions,
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 03:18 PM
Nov 24

were believed not to need Social Security.

MichMan

(13,831 posts)
14. I never heard anyone ever say that private sector employees can opt out of FICA taxes as long as they have a pension.
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:11 PM
Nov 24

Interested in knowing how long that has been an option. What about a 401k?

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
17. My mom was in the teacher's union and their contract said they would get a pension
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:25 PM
Nov 24

and not have to pay FICA -- but obviously part of their pay went into the pension. She's been retired about 20 years. She never got any SS benefits.

I wonder if this affects her now.

I don't know if IRAs can be like this but I doubt it.

Response to LymphocyteLover (Reply #17)

Response to MichMan (Reply #14)

LymphocyteLover

(7,096 posts)
12. My mom was a teacher and has a generous pension and never contributed to SS
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 06:06 PM
Nov 24

so doesn't get SS

bucolic_frolic

(48,037 posts)
6. Rare that I agree with anyone from the Cato Institute
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 03:01 PM
Nov 24

From the link:

"Policy experts also express their concerns. Romina Boccia, director of budget and entitlement policy at the Cato Institute, criticized the bill, stating the policy is wrong and needs broader changes.

"We should reform Social Security so that it provides basic income security to the most vulnerable Americans in old age without adding to the debt or tax burden that younger workers face," Boccia said."

GreenWave

(9,736 posts)
10. If Trump is told a family member of his invented SSI and somebody stole the idea...
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 05:06 PM
Nov 24

it will stay rock solid.

marybourg

(13,247 posts)
22. This has nothing to do with SSI, which is a program for low-income.
Sun Nov 24, 2024, 08:09 PM
Nov 24

Don’t confuse it with S.S. Just a coincidence of initials.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»House Passes $196 Billion...