General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGuess what David Brooks thinks is trump's ruling passion?
No, this is not a joke. Elite journalist David Brooks (NYT) thinks trump's ruling passion is to "dismantle the elites" who have screwed over the middle class.
AND he demands that Harris show the public what her ruling passion is, because according to this idiot, she has not.
I don't even know what to say.
paleotn
(19,349 posts)Donnys ruling passions are self aggrandizement and theft. A complete moron could see that. But not Brooks.
no_hypocrisy
(49,003 posts)they blackballed him from joining their country clubs, e.g., The Tuxedo Club, Maidstone in Easthampton, etc.
Brother Buzz
(37,935 posts)He simply crashed events
Devilsun
(273 posts)Biophilic
(4,882 posts)Years ago I read the time. I hated that asshole then and obviously he hasnt improved.
tanyev
(44,619 posts)iemanja
(54,817 posts)senseandsensibility
(20,362 posts)Don't remember posting that he was.
niyad
(120,328 posts)moron when it comes to assessing TRAITOR**.
Bettie
(17,208 posts)the elites as well?
Mark.b2
(474 posts)elleng
(136,461 posts)Lonestarblue
(11,888 posts)Brooks has list touch with reality if he thinks Trump cares about the muddle class or indeed anyone but himself.
senseandsensibility
(20,362 posts)Someone that clueless is not any kind of journalist if you ask me. But to write for the NYT? Do you know how many really gifted journalists would kill for that job?
Johonny
(22,135 posts)That he claims to be an expert in morals and ethics is hilarious. He has neither and never will. He makes bucks making sure the elites screw the middle class and the poor. He doesn't give a shit about anyone, just like Trump. That the NYT keeps printing him demonstrates how little they care for their readers intelligence.
LAS14
(14,730 posts)Ocelot II
(121,167 posts)Dude, Trump's ruling passion is Trump.
PedroXimenez
(608 posts)and he's been framing the dems as the elites and the republicans as populists for decades.
Alice Kramden
(2,406 posts)Anywhere - let alone the NYT. David Brooks is a self-important idiot
Retrograde
(10,694 posts)I don't have any proof, but I suspect it involves pictures or recordings the NYT higher-ups don't want circulated. Certainly can't be their astute observations on contemporary American life.
(I confess I get the NYT columnists mixed up at times, so I just refuse to read any one whose name begins with a B - first or last. If you superimpose the D and R it looks kinda like a B, so DoubtThat or DoucheHat or however he pronounces his name falls into that category)
Blue Owl
(54,833 posts)Yeah, I dont think so buddy .
senseandsensibility
(20,362 posts)with that photo he included in his tweet about it showing that he also had at least a couple of scotches too.
skypilot
(8,939 posts)...after all these years.
3825-87867
(1,118 posts)they get too close to tramp and inhale too much rump flatulence. Has bad effect on what's left of their brains.
usonian
(14,220 posts)Her entire career!
Cha
(305,622 posts)Cha
(305,622 posts)bluesbassman
(19,856 posts)Yeah, I'm sittin' on this barstool
Talkin' like a damn fool
Got the twelve o'clock news blues
And I've given up hope
On the afternoon soaps
And a bottle of cold brew
Is it any wonder I'm not crazy
Is it any wonder I'm sane at all
Initech
(102,189 posts)RidinWithHarris
(790 posts)Git that Brooks is, I still thought he'd at least know better than this.
AllyCat
(17,151 posts)I think the job and his little bubble of a world have gotten too small for him.
RockRaven
(16,411 posts)The MOST transparent thing about TCF -- aside from a) being a goddamn idiot and b) inveterate liar -- is that he utterly disdains normal/regular/average people except for their usefulness as suckers/dupes/marks.
David Brooks is like Thomas Friedman and scores of other people foisted upon the public by NYT over the years as Very Important Deep Thinkers; these fuckwits mistake their flatus for novel ideas because it originates from within.
usonian
(14,220 posts)🎉🎈🍾