Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:16 PM Dec 2012

Republicans wave the white flag

Speaker John Boehner emerged from his weekly huddle with House Republicans on Wednesday morning to take his place behind a mahogany lectern in front of a brown backdrop. The dark tones provided ideal camouflage for the deeply tanned speaker — as though he were trying to vanish into the background.

Who could blame him?

Right now, he is hoping to lead his fractious GOP to an orderly surrender. The question is no longer whether Republicans will give on taxes; they already have. All that remains to be negotiated is how they will increase taxes, and whether they will do it before or after the government reaches the “fiscal cliff.”

“I believe that it’s appropriate to put revenues on the table,” Boehner told reporters. “Now, the revenues we’re putting on the table are going to come from — guess who? — the rich.”

Socialist! Redistributionist! Spreader of wealth!

One of Boehner’s lieutenants, Pete Roskam of Illinois, stepped to the microphones, essentially pleading for the president to show mercy. “President Obama has an unbelievable opportunity to be a transformational president — that is, to bring the country together,” he said. “Or he can devolve into zero-sum-game politics, where he wins and other people lose.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-republicans-wave-the-white-flag/2012/12/05/24c3c45e-3f1d-11e2-bca3-aadc9b7e29c5_story.html?hpid=z4

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republicans wave the white flag (Original Post) Playinghardball Dec 2012 OP
I choose zero game politics - for the Republicans, of course. liberalmuse Dec 2012 #1
I'm with you Lifelong Protester Dec 2012 #3
~~This~~ 99Forever Dec 2012 #2
"Zero Sum" is an idiotic descriptor of either the conservative or liberal positions. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #4
I hope Obama crushes them Politicalboi Dec 2012 #5
Should have thought of that demwing Dec 2012 #6

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
1. I choose zero game politics - for the Republicans, of course.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:20 PM
Dec 2012

Oh, how I love seeing the same a-hats who slapped our bipartisan President's hand away form many years now begging for him to let them have the chance to do it again. And how they squeal now that he isn't. What a bunch of cry-baby whiners!

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
3. I'm with you
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:24 PM
Dec 2012

the "other people (who) lose" can be those whiny repubs.

After that Treaty vote went down in the Senate, I have NO TIME for ANY repub malarkey.(I realize this is the House, but the feeling for those repubs is the same...if not more opposed).

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
2. ~~This~~
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:22 PM
Dec 2012
“Or he can devolve into zero-sum-game politics, where he wins and other people lose.”


As long as those "other people" are the rich who haven't paid their fare share in decades, if ever, sounds wonderful to me.

Cry me a freakin' river, Pete.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. "Zero Sum" is an idiotic descriptor of either the conservative or liberal positions.
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:35 PM
Dec 2012

The Conservative model, by taking from the bottom to feed the top, results in a negative sum, suppressing the economy. That's what has been happening since 2008.

The liberal model, by distributing wealth more effectively and putting people to work rebuilding the country, is a positive-sum game. We all end up better off.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republicans wave the whit...