HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Rhode Island Judge Has St...

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:04 AM

Rhode Island Judge Has Stake in Pension Case Outcome


Judge Sarah Taft-Carter of Rhode Island's Superior Court is hearing the pension cases. The lawyer David Boies is pushing for cuts

Can a judge rule impartially on pension cuts when her mother, her son, her uncle and even she herself all have a stake in preserving the status quo?

Rhode Island, the site of a sweeping pension overhaul last year, has brought in a prominent New York lawyer to litigate the question: David Boies, perhaps best known for representing Al Gore in the fight over the 2000 presidential election and for waging an antitrust battle against Microsoft on behalf of the government in the 1990s.

Rhode Islandís dispute may not reach quite those dramatic heights, but it is being closely watched as a first major test of whether, and how, financially strained states and cities can cut the benefits of their workers and retirees.

Several public employee unions have sued Gov. Lincoln Chafee and other Rhode Island officials, accusing them of acting illegally when they pushed through a package of money-saving pension cuts last year, including suspending annual cost-of-living increases for most retirees. The unions want the richer benefits restored.

1 replies, 652 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Rhode Island Judge Has Stake in Pension Case Outcome (Original post)
xchrom Dec 2012 OP
lonestarnot Dec 2012 #1

Response to xchrom (Original post)

Wed Dec 5, 2012, 10:06 AM

1. If there is not a problem with conflict of interest on SCOTUS, how can we do anything at lower


levels? Recusal is apparently a thing of the past.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread