Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:31 PM Nov 2012

Call me nuts, but I think Obama should sign an Executive Order that should order the U.S. Treasury

_NOT_ to pay the majority of the House its usual salary, but at a minimum hourly wage just for the Republicans. They won't bother with anything except obstruct the Congress from doing business. And since the House Republicans wants to keep a short Congress, then let's pay them an hourly wage, federal minimum at $7.75 an hour. And tie their health care with the wages earned.

That should move some Republicans quickly to the Democratic side and retake the House and put the blame on Boehner.

Once the House is retaken, EO is reversed until 2014, pitting on the Republicans to cease to exist unless they learn the value of the dollar better.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Call me nuts, but I think Obama should sign an Executive Order that should order the U.S. Treasury (Original Post) Panasonic Nov 2012 OP
I don't think the president is constitutionally in charge of Congressional salaries frazzled Nov 2012 #1
pay them an hourly wage, Flashmann Nov 2012 #2
that would, ironically, be an impeachable offense. cali Nov 2012 #3
Don't think he has that power davidn3600 Nov 2012 #4
Two words.. Fumesucker Nov 2012 #5
They get their money from legal insider trading johnd83 Nov 2012 #6
You're nuts. Yo_Mama Nov 2012 #7
Why pay the House GOP that much? It isn't like they do anything. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #8
Congress controls the purse nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #9
27th Amedment muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #10

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. I don't think the president is constitutionally in charge of Congressional salaries
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:33 PM
Nov 2012

They vote their own salaries. The president can't be boss of the Congress.

Flashmann

(2,140 posts)
2. pay them an hourly wage,
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:40 PM
Nov 2012

I doubt many of them would notice....Congressional salaries must be just so much chump change compared to the bribery.......

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. that would, ironically, be an impeachable offense.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:42 PM
Nov 2012

It would directly contravene the U.S. Constitution.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
4. Don't think he has that power
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:04 PM
Nov 2012

The President cannot directly control anything that has to do with nation's spending. The Constitution is quite specific that the House of Representatives is the one that controls the purse. It's part of the separation of powers.

The reason the founders gave that power to the House was for 2 main reasons:
1. The House is closer to the people. The representatives are elected on the local level. Until 1914, Senators were appointed by the States. So they thought the House would better represent the people's wishes in both urban and rural populations.
2. The founding fathers also thought Senators and the President would more often than not be more wealthy than members of the House and would be more willing to spend the people's tax money without regard.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
7. You're nuts.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:39 PM
Nov 2012

Fortunately, neither our president nor the Supreme Court justices are, so this won't fly.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Call me nuts, but I think...