Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:06 PM Nov 2012

The current John Galt fad -- total f**cking scam...

Here is what I just posted on FB (I have a lot of GOP/Tea Bagger "friends&quot ...

--------------

Here is what's confusing me about the new John Galt fad among CEOs...Paul Ryan, budget guru and VP nominee, was an Ayn Rand devotee. So, what did you think was going to happen when/if he took office?

The pizza CEOs and the coal mining CEOs and the shitty food chain CEOs are all going John Galt on America ostensibly because Obama got elected. But Obama is not an Ayn Randian -- YOUR GUY WAS! Seriously, isn't this what you would have done anyway? If Romney had won, wouldn't you have just laid off all your employees anyway and said it was because of Ayn Rand/John Galt, because that's what Paul Ryan espoused and was nominated for?

I'm calling bullshit. I'm saying Papa John and Mr. Applebee and John "Coal Mine" Murray are totally, 100% full of shit. They were just looking for an excuse to further line their bloated pockets and cut the wages of the workforce which made them rich. Fuck them all.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The current John Galt fad -- total f**cking scam... (Original Post) Atman Nov 2012 OP
Yes, but Romney would have reduced their taxes and stuff... phantom power Nov 2012 #1
All these CEOs who are pouting about Obama and won't spend money on growth MidwestTransplant Nov 2012 #2
Typical CEO is a parasite, not a Galt smaug Nov 2012 #3

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
1. Yes, but Romney would have reduced their taxes and stuff...
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:12 PM
Nov 2012

so they wouldn't have to Go Galt. It would have been Objectivist Paradise1!!11 For the 1%. And as we know, they wouldn't really care about the other 99%

MidwestTransplant

(8,015 posts)
2. All these CEOs who are pouting about Obama and won't spend money on growth
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 05:26 PM
Nov 2012

are going to have their lunch eaten by their competition.

smaug

(230 posts)
3. Typical CEO is a parasite, not a Galt
Mon Nov 12, 2012, 06:37 PM
Nov 2012

"Professional" CEOs (you know, those with a general MBA and no real world working experience) like these clowns can't go Galt. How? What do they provide that is so essential to society that society could not function without them? Remember that the idiot who started the idea of the teabaggin'?

He's a commodity broker; in effect, a middleman whose sole purpose is to make himself a necessary 'broker' between buyer and seller. Read same for stockbroker, "financial advisor", banker and all the parasitic vermin who in the vampiric tradition fasten themselves onto vulnerable victims. Too many people are focused on financial manipulation and not enough on actually, you know, producing something.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The current John Galt fad...