General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Cantor knew about the Petraeus story before the White House did, and
didn't inform the White House, isn't that a betrayal of his responsibility to act in the best interest of the nation?
Like, maybe, an act of TREASON by omission?
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)The FBI seems like the appropriate agency to handle this. And if it is in the FBI hands, it's up to them to disclose or not to disclose as they see the best course of action of the investigation.
djean111
(14,255 posts)if he had a choice, he would sit on the info hoping to use it for impeachment purposes if Romney lost.
But presumably Cantor cannot tell the FBI what to do. I hope.
malaise
(268,930 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)because they thought it could be covered up. Petraeus has been cited by the GOP as a potential candidate for President. Cantor wants to be VP and this information would be a way to blackmail Petraeus into choosing him or else the world would know. I think Cantor was forced by circumstance to reveal the information.
This is just my speculation and opinion but stranger things have happened in our history.
jsr
(7,712 posts)It is the simplest explanation right now.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)ESPECIALLY if Cantor withheld knowledge about Petraeus story.
He needs to be expelled from Congress, and Wayne Powell wins the special election that is held the week before the new Congress gets seated.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)is failure to notify the President "treason"?
That word gets tossed around here like crazy.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)about a head of a key cabinet position (oh, like the CIA) is definetely dangerous and could be used to topple the President.
That is treason, by definition, and Cantor is in serious trouble. I expect Ethics Committee to convene shortly to discuss two matters - one Issa and one Cantor to be expelled from the U.S. House of Representatives.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Since the Constitutional definition is the only one that matters.
onenote
(42,694 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)"Treason" - when someone does something I don't like that involves our government or a foreign country.
Similar to another word that gets tossed around like crazy.
"Nazi" - a person that I don't like.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Simply for calling out the misuse of the word.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)The FBI employee originally went to Representative Dave Reichert of Washington (also of Green River Killer task force fame). Reichert, rather oddly, passed him (or her) on to Eric Cantor.
Cantor referred the matter back to the FBI.
It seems clear that both the FBI employee and Reichert were looking to make election hay out of this issue. Cantor refused to do so, and went through the proper channels. Now, Cantor's motivation for doing so are unclear. I suspect that he was just as shocked as anybody, and because he's a Virginia guy, he's probably been around Petraeus a lot. Indeed, he's probably personal friends with Petraeus.
So, the FBI employee meets with him with this information, and Cantor doesn't like it at all. He essentially turned the FBI employee into the FBI Director. But this was the right thing to do, since the FBI employee was in essence interfering with an ongoing investigation in order to make an impact on the election.
pinto
(106,886 posts)pre-election investigation hay. Reichart may have felt his responsibility was to pass the info on to his leader in the House. The employee, though, should have gone up the ladder within his own department and let the FBI Director make the follow up call.
Worth noting as an aside that internecine politics exist in the FBI and the CIA for that matter. Maybe less so than in other departments, but neither are devoid of partisan political advocates.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)Cantor was caught between a rock and a hard place...
Should he?
1. Jump in an destroy the Republican Party's "Great White Hope" for 2016?
or
2. Destroy the iconic general and try to pin the Obama Administration with a scandal?
Decisions, decisions, decisions....
He punted.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)Without knowing the legal definition. By that tortured logic then Petraeus committed treason since he knew the story immediately before anyone else and did not inform anyone. And Obama committed treason since after he knew the story he praised Petraeus to the sky.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Treason has a very specific definition, and this isn't even close.
And yes, I'm constantly amazed at how often "treason" gets thrown around here at DU.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)That given the state of affairs pretty much all of them are Treasonous Bastards being that they are destroying our country and giving aid and comfort to our enemies.
And you do tend to amaze me, SO1P, you are seemingly everywhere preaching aid and comfort for our enemies.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)And I remember you being against me when I was preaching about them stealing votes.
But the real question is: why are you protecting Cantor on this thread? He is our enemy, right?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)And calling out people that obviously have no idea what it is as they accuse people of it is not "protecting Cantor". "Treason by omisson"? That's not even a real concept.
Here is the definition of treason (bolding added by me):
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
While Cantor may well be an enemy of Democrats, I don't believe him to be an enemy of the United States, which is what he would need to be in order to be "treasonous".
Show me what you have that shows that Cantor levied war against the United States or where he adhered to enemies of the United States, giving them aid and comfort, and we'll talk.
For that matter, show me where I've done either of those things.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Cantor, just this summer, tried his best to destroy the Good Faith and Credit of the US.
If you are so blind as to not see what Cantor has been doing, you need to go back and study the archives of faux news. It's all there, I am sure.
As far as I am concerned, Cantor is my enemy, because he made himself as such. I take it he is your friend?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)The fact that I won't accuse him (or anyone else) of treason just because they don't act the way I want them to?
I'm of the opinion that people who want to throw political enemies into prison without charge, trial or conviction to be much more of a danger to democracy than the political enemies themselves.
YMMV.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Why do you feel you have to make stuff up?
He should be charged, have a fair trial and then be thrown in prison.
He is not my friend. He is my enemy, Is he your friend or an enemy?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)He's a political opponent, a man with a leadership role in an opposing political party. Politically, he's an enemy. On a personal level, he's nothing to me.
former9thward
(31,981 posts)Or better yet, shot without trial? Tell us what you really want.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)What? You think he is not a criminal?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)doesn't meet the standard. When charges are brought and he's found guilty, then throw him under the jail.
If you have proof of his criminal activity, I would recommend contacting the FBI in DC ASAP. You should be able to Google their number.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)What you forget is that Bush, et al, including Cantor, are criminals. They just have not been convicted yet.
What drives you to be so coddling of these criminals?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)former9thward
(31,981 posts)In addition to your disgust for the Constitution are you in the prison business? We will need a lot of them to house about 100 million people.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)I also learned today that it's treasonous to actually know the definition of treason.
I'm very upset with my fifth grade history teacher for not making it clear to me that by educating me, he was making me a criminal.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You do know what website you are on, right?
And somehow this wisdom disturbs you?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Why are so overwrought about this? Submit the evidence, and let the investigation begin.
former9thward
(31,981 posts)I think you should read the Constitution, if you can stomach it, and then we can talk about "wisdom", something which you have not shown in any of your posts on this thread.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)He has done what he could do keep Obama from making progress. He has supported the possible theft of my vote. He supports the Bush criminal activities.
What is he to you?
former9thward
(31,981 posts)But please continue with your obsession.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)position or something.
No one probably wanted to interfere with the election, either. The W.H. was told on Wednesday. Cantor was told on Tuesday, I think.
Could be the FBI's duty to tell the W.H. Dunno.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)If there was an investigation going on at the time Cantor found it, which it appears there was, the FBI may have told him to keep his mouth shut.
Who knows at this point, but it will have to come out in the end.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)and then called the guy from the FBI that had gone to the other Congressman.
Blue4Texas
(437 posts)Tippy
(4,610 posts)She is mad as hell she was not contacted...
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Someone else should be assigned Leader and any other involved positions so they don't delay our Govs time.
Rex
(65,616 posts)If he doesn't lose his job over this...hahaha WHO am I kidding!? Repukes are criminal scum, they never pay for their crimes against the State.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Part and Parcel of Issa's bullshit Libya diatribe. Cantor is done politically,remember Jane the Harmon.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Feinstein, D-Calif., said she first learned of Petraeus' affair from the media late last week and was dumbstruck when Petraeus confirmed the affair to her in a telephone call Friday. She said she has since been briefed by the FBI but wants to know why the bureau didn't notify her sooner that the CIA chief was at the center of a serious inquiry.
"We are very much able to keep things in a classified setting," she told "Fox News Sunday." "At least if you know, you can begin to think and then to plan. And, of course, we have not had that opportunity."
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)"giving aid and comfort to the enemy." For example, he could have been blackmailed by hostile foreign entities into giving false information or not taking proper action in a case involving--well--who knows?
Sorta like someone tells you there's a bomb on a battleship & you over it up.
amborin
(16,631 posts)control
more here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021792169