They're going to "what about the Clinton's, Obama's and Biden's" all over the press

Did they not pay their taxes? Did they hide documents? Did they incite an insurrection? Hmmm.. I don’t understand 🤔

So I doubt very much they’ll be bringing up Edwards, lol.

I know, I know. Republicans think accusations ARE proof enough, and that where there's someone CLAIMING smoke there must be fire, and that an utter lack of evidence just proves it's all been hidden. But still -- maybe most thinking Americans can finally come to see that Republicans' incessant claims of Democrats' wrongdoing are simply made-up, wishful-thinking, sour-grapes bullshit.

==========

and then bloviate, etc.

My response was that he committed fraud, tax fraud, and that hurts our troops.

“Clinton’s, Obama’s and Biden’s”. (Oh, my)

Pure Republicanese. English does not use an apostrophe to form a plural. Republicanese does.

EXCERPTS FROM THE OFFICIAL DICTIONARY OF REPUBLICANESE

In Republicanese, many words that sound alike may be spelled differently at random. A few prominent examples:

In Republicanese, the following words may be spelled at random using any of the three ways given:

A.) Two, Too, To
B.) Their, They're, There
c.) Your, Yore, You're

The Republicanese version of Robin Hood therefore starts with "In days of you're...."

The only rule is that the correct use of them as in English is never permitted twice in a row.

Words with single letters that change meaning when that letter is doubled must never be used in correct English context. The classic example is “lose” vs. “loose.” In Republicanese, if you do not win an election, then you “loose” that election. Conversely, if your (Republicanese: you’re) belt is too tight, you need it more “lose” in order to be comfortable. Another example would be the Republicanese, “I met Donald Trump, and he was rudder than I imagined,” vs. “I grabbed the ruder and was able to steer the boat to shore.”

In English, the contraction for "it is" is written "it's." To show possession referring to something previously mentioned, one writes "its." In Republicanese, it is the other way around. Example:
English: “It's impractical for a building to have its solar panels in the basement.”
Republicanese: “Its impractical for a building to have it's solar panels in the basement.”

In Republicanese, an apostrophe is used to form a plural, whereas this is never correct in English. But it must be done at random, never systematically. For example, Bill and Hillary are "the Clinton's," but Bill, Chelsea and Hillary are "the Clintons." The other way around is also correct. In Republicanese, either form is correct as long as it is not spelled the same way twice in a row.

Example:
In English, one writes "The Clintons like dogs."
In Republicanese, this can be written as "The Clinton's like dogs," or "The Clintons like dog's" or "The Clinton's like dog's." The only version that would be incorrect in Republicanese would be to use no apostrophe at all. Only English is written that way.

I thought it was implied through context.

Fox? Sure.

CNN, MSNBC? Nope.
ABC, NBC, CBS? Nope.

The major newspapers: Times, Post, etc.? Nope.

It's all over the socials.