Sat Mar 18, 2023, 08:17 AM
Cattledog (5,676 posts)
Mayan civilization eventually disappeared because
everything they used was "imported".
Interesting observation from story on "CBS Sat Morning"
|
9 replies, 792 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Cattledog | Saturday | OP |
edhopper | Saturday | #1 | |
NutmegYankee | Saturday | #2 | |
NutmegYankee | Saturday | #3 | |
modrepub | Saturday | #4 | |
Igel | Saturday | #5 | |
Carlitos Brigante | Saturday | #6 | |
haele | Saturday | #8 | |
sarcasmo | Saturday | #7 | |
ProfessorGAC | Saturday | #9 |
Response to Cattledog (Original post)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 08:57 AM
edhopper (30,652 posts)
1. Didn't it disappear
because the Spanish destroyed it?
|
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
NutmegYankee This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 09:03 AM
NutmegYankee (15,734 posts)
3. The classic Mayan civilization declined in the 9th century AD
Remnants remained, but it was nowhere near the peak.
|
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 10:06 AM
modrepub (3,193 posts)
4. Seasonal Rains Failed
For some reason, the easterly winds bringing tropical moisture to the area were interrupted for an extended period of time. Long term drought set in and crop yields fell below levels that could support the population. With resources stretched, the political system broke down and wide-spread warfare broke out. That solved the population to food problem. Eventually the remnant populations migrated to places that could support them and the great cities were abandon.
Agricultural based societies are highly sensitive to extended perturbations in the climate system. It's thought that some of the problems the Roman Empire faced were related to shifts in precipitation and temperature inside and outside the empire. The great migrations that impacted the Roman Empire in the 4th and 5th centuries may have been triggered by changes across the far off Steppes that caused mass migrations westward, pushing the border german tribes against and into the empire. The Huns being the most famous of these steppe horseman tribes to terrorize the Romans. |
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:07 PM
Igel (33,500 posts)
5. They crashed the colonialist Aztecs' government. Not the Mayans'.
They came in from somewhere (likely north, from indigenous traditions, but the center of gravity and diversity for Uto-Aztecan language is in NW Mexico, and it's plausible to think that they expanded from there).
Mayan civ mostly dried up--literally, as cenotes went dry when the rain failed and agricultural production declined. There's also a bit of evidence for cultural evolution towards more heavy-handed rulers, as well. |
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:09 PM
Carlitos Brigante (25,851 posts)
6. They destroyed what was left. Not entirely of course, but they sure
as shit tried.
|
Response to edhopper (Reply #1)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:25 PM
haele (11,819 posts)
8. Ask the Mayans still living in Guatemala, Honduras and Eastern Mexico....
The great kingdoms were fading before the Spanish appeared and disappeared sometime between 900 and 1000 C.E., but the Mayan people are still there living in the shadows of their Empires.
They stayed in the Highlands and deep jungle areas to avoid the other civilizations and Spanish. Europeans eventually found the Mayans themselves in the late 1700's/early 1800's. Haele |
Response to Cattledog (Original post)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:12 PM
sarcasmo (22,937 posts)
7. Imported from China?
Response to Cattledog (Original post)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:34 PM
ProfessorGAC (57,726 posts)
9. We Need To Define "Everything"
I question that thesis, but what does "import everything" mean?
The US GDP last year was $23.3 trillion. Total value of imported goods & services into the US was $3.12 trillion, with $2.2 trillion in exports. So, in gross terms, imports was 13.3% of GDP, but net imports only about 3.8% of GDP. I am, of course, assuming a parallel is being drawn about the demise of the Mayans & the US. But, if my assumption is correct we are a very long way from "import everything". Admittedly, only $2.4 trillion of GDP is directly assigned to "manufacturing". But, because this only accounts for base manufacturing going straight to consumer (a fully assembled car, copper wire, paper goods, etc.), but doesn't include food, it's a little misleading. Yet, 60% is still a long way from "everything" |