Over on CBS news they just reported double billing by Wuhan Lab to US

1. Her education consists solely of a bachelor degree in English language and literature.
2. She works for Kansas republican senator Roger Marshall, who is another election denier who refuses to say that Biden won the election.

Former gov prosecutor. Are you referring to the prosecutor or the news person?

https://www.linkedin.com/in/diane-cutler-43113620/?profileId=ACoAAARKaeUBag0tVWj1KBCfrUIQwUJOv88NYHw

Hair on fire!!!

Science is a process - not a religion. It can be questioned, tested, and researched. People who have been clamoring to ensure no one asks questions or investigate obvious things - and to then attempt to condemn those who ask questions - is about as anti-science as I can think of.

They're thinking of religion with these attitudes.

People are finally looking into questions that a top-down censorship attempt wished to shove deep under the rug. The drip-drip-drip of all this is incredibly interesting. Little stories appearing more and more in the media, officials involved kind of easing into other versions of events, "Well, maybe it could've been . . ."

Narratives crumbling after objective investigation begins uncovering information that was censored is about as pro-science as I can think.

I'll never understand how people let their politics get ahead of science. What was the use? I get why people in power do what they do. I'll never understand why lay people go to bat for this stuff.

I’d ask why people are so against looking into what happened.

I like the comparison in the story. It’d be like saying an NTSB investigation after a plane crash wasn’t warranted, and anyone who wanted one is a conspiracy theorist.

That is just not the scientific play in any universe I live in.

The political and the tribal cannot be a part of science. Ever.

Can you explain to me how a potential financial fraud makes a lab-leak origin of COVID 19 more or less likely as a matter of science?

How would a scientist factor this information into determining the origin of the virus?

I'm not aware that "things that make you go 'hmmm'" is a valid part of a scientific inquiry.

As for the NTSB analogy: It's a bit like saying, "There's evidence that plane was paid for with stolen money! Why isn't the NTSB looking into that? Huh?"

Again and again, we see it with this lab. We're not funding this research. Ok, maybe we were funding this research. The lab was fine. Nevermind, the lab was not fine. This could never have happened. Ok, it might have happened.

Again and again, we get these little pieces of information that are very contrary from what we were told in the beginning of things, and all of this was actively suppressed by people in power.

You're not curious? Because I'm real fucking curious. I find this total lack of curiosity curious in itself.

It's another piece of kindling on a situation that is creating an awful lot of smoke for "Nothing happened! Stop questioning!"

It's becoming a very strange story, with each piece speaking to a simple idea: We may not know for certain it came from the lab - but we absolutely know a lot of people ran around, lied, and covered up because it seems like they believed it could have.

More and more, it seems like some people higher up in pharma and government didn't want it to be clear what was going on with this lab.

I think we've reached the point where ignoring this and pretending there is nothing to see here is now an untenable political position - not a scientific one.

You're reciting things that look hincty. You're stating that there was some kind of coverup.

That's actually political analysis, or detective work.

But you keep hectoring people about rejecting science.

You're not offering any science.

Questions do not equal science.

I think at this point the highest likelihood is that there cannot be a definitive answer where the virus originated or how it got into circulation.

As far as I know, investigation continues. I'm all in favor of that.

As far as I'm concerned everyone with any power should take all possible measures to prevent viruses from jumping from animals to humans and to prevent viruses from escaping from labs.

And the source of COVID 19 changes that opinion not one whit.

Which includes posing questions, investigating, gathering evidence, testing to see if the evidence bears out the hypothesis, showing the results to the public so that it can be evaluated.

People who want no questions, no evidence gathering, and no discussion cannot then in the next breath say they're defending science.

Science is the process of inquiry. People who would shut down inquiry don't give a shit about science. It's a pretense.

It's very 16th Century Catholic Church. I almost admire the sheer elegance and simplicity of the irony being managed.

This particular rhetorical trick is a bit below your usual skill level.

Your trope is: Scientists ask questions, man. Questions are what science is all about. Therefore, all questions are science and anyone who questions the questions is antiscience (an interesting proposition: In your formulation, anyone who says, "I question your premises" is antiscience, although by asking questions they must perforce be scientists, or at least scientific).

For a quick example: In the course of litigation, one must develop a theory of the case: Why did this thing happen and who is at fault? You test your working theory by asking questions, both of witnesses and of the theory itself. That does not turn lawyers into scientists.

You do realize, I trust, that you are fronting a conspiracy theory. I am not using that in its application as a conversation ender. Conspiracies do happen. But you are pretty avidly advocating the idea that a pretty substantial number of people got together to cover up a great crime.

It may have happened. There may be other motivations for the actions you criticize.

I don't know, nor do you.

I do know that, again, an actual scientist is not going to say, "There was financial funny business at the Wuhan lab. I must take that into account when I look at the mutations of this virus."

I think it would be more comfortable for you, and more convincing to your readers, if you simply said, "I think COVID 19 was developed in the Wuhan lab and accidentally released (or released on purpose, if that's where you are)." I'm not sure what you gain by going on the attack any time anyone questions that narrative.

It seems more obfuscatory than revelatory.

FBI just said they knew it was most likely from a lab in 2021 & past CDC director said the same thing. There are reported to be 55 Bio 4 labs and 3000 Bio 3 labs in the world with NO regulations. We had to close Ft Detrick in 2019 for 5 violations in their labs - 2 very serious ones & we are a country that can provide our labs the best of everything. What about labs in very poor countries ? We need to find out what we can because with mega Bio labs around the world, another escape is likely. We knew the Wuhan lab was doing sloppy work as cables were sent by diplomats to warn US that the Wuhan lab had mega safety violations and was doing Bio Lab 4 work in a Bio 2 lab. US now admits we should have been more involved in the research/safety of that lab because of all the grants we gave to Eco Health Alliance for the lab.

This virus is like no others. Yale & Mt Sinai are studying the blood/ immune system of those with Long Covid. Exhausted T cells - similar to those with HIV & cancer. CD 8 cells and natural killer cells are depressed. Most other infections don’t ruin peoples immune systems like Covid does. Tons of questions need to be asked. Thousands of people complaining on social media they are constantly sick - cold after cold, flu, pneumonia etc. Sounds like immune systems are trashed. We need to ask a gazillion questions and one is why did we give the Wuhan lab so much money.

"This virus is like no others..." except that it's "similar to HIV..."

Scientists have warned for decades that coronaviruses are a serious threat to human health. That's why they were studying them.

There are certainly problems in Chiba and it's certain that the U.S. has done terrible things, but could we please not believe everything Fox News and the innuendo that the (running to catch up with the hysteria) MSM says? You have named dedicated public servants in your posts about COVID that make them sound like evil villains in a James Bond movie. These people and the young investigators in their labs are getting death threats. These are the people who developed a vaccine that saved many of our lives. They've worked around the clock for years.

Misinformation is going to get people killed.

There has to be some significance, but I just can't figure out what it is.

Thanks for catching it - I changed it.