HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Why Wasn't A Recovery Hel...

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:13 PM

Why Wasn't A Recovery Helicopter On The Scene Of The Downed Balloon?....

The helicopter could have been on the scene very fast and maybe could have snagged the wreckage before it sank in 47ft of water. They could maybe kept it afloat until a ship came to the area.

You know like they do NASA recovery of space capsules.

Now I hear they have to send divers to recover the debris.

62 replies, 2184 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 62 replies Author Time Post
Reply Why Wasn't A Recovery Helicopter On The Scene Of The Downed Balloon?.... (Original post)
global1 Feb 4 OP
Ocelot II Feb 4 #1
LineLineReply .
LuckyCharms Feb 4 #2
Hekate Feb 4 #4
global1 Feb 4 #8
Ocelot II Feb 4 #12
jeffreyi Feb 4 #14
treestar Feb 4 #18
Mr.Bill Feb 4 #20
likesmountains 52 Feb 4 #19
inthewind21 Feb 6 #55
packman Feb 4 #3
Red Mountain Feb 4 #5
FSogol Feb 4 #16
sheshe2 Feb 4 #6
GoCubsGo Feb 4 #11
fescuerescue Feb 4 #29
sanatanadharma Feb 4 #7
rsdsharp Feb 4 #13
bedazzled Feb 4 #22
rsdsharp Feb 4 #9
Hope22 Feb 4 #10
global1 Feb 4 #21
Ocelot II Feb 4 #23
Sewa Feb 4 #28
Ocelot II Feb 4 #30
Disaffected Feb 4 #35
inthewind21 Feb 6 #56
Chautauquas Feb 6 #58
BlackSkimmer Feb 6 #61
Deuxcents Feb 4 #37
fescuerescue Feb 4 #27
Disaffected Feb 4 #33
Chautauquas Feb 6 #59
yardwork Feb 6 #57
ananda Feb 4 #15
Wounded Bear Feb 4 #17
fightforfreedom Feb 4 #24
Shellback Squid Feb 4 #25
haele Feb 4 #36
Irish_Dem Feb 5 #42
onenote Feb 5 #43
Irish_Dem Feb 5 #44
Shellback Squid Feb 6 #47
Irish_Dem Feb 6 #51
fescuerescue Feb 4 #26
moniss Feb 4 #31
Dum Aloo Feb 4 #32
MarineCombatEngineer Feb 4 #34
mcar Feb 4 #38
maxrandb Feb 4 #39
Drum Feb 5 #40
Irish_Dem Feb 5 #41
ZonkerHarris Feb 5 #45
global1 Feb 5 #46
Stuart G Feb 6 #48
kentuck Feb 6 #49
Chakaconcarne Feb 6 #50
Alexander Of Assyria Feb 6 #52
Alexander Of Assyria Feb 6 #53
Kaleva Feb 6 #54
ruet Feb 6 #60
Vinca Feb 6 #62

Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:14 PM

1. Why aren't you working for the Air Force so you could have told them how to do it right?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:19 PM

2. .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:20 PM

4. ***

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:27 PM

8. I'm Retired...nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #8)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:34 PM

12. You could be a consultant, though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #12)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:36 PM

14. Yeah.

Set 'em straight, already.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:41 PM

18. perfect answer

to these kinds of questions!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to treestar (Reply #18)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:52 PM

20. What are you trying to do,

shut down half of the internet?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:41 PM

19. Yes!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:14 PM

55. lol

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:20 PM

3. Do you really think that we aren't going to recover that crap?

 

No way they are just going to let it sink away into the ocean depths. Yep, divers will get all that shit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:22 PM

5. I wouldn't really want to be in the boat

close enough to see the bits impact the water and grab them before they could sink.

Would you?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Red Mountain (Reply #5)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:39 PM

16. They could get a big baseball glove and catch it.

Easy peasy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:26 PM

6. A space capsule is one ship coming down in a direct line

The balloon's debris is now spread in a 7 mile radius. Seven miles.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sheshe2 (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:33 PM

11. Yes, and space capsules usually float down with three or four parachutes.

Granted the balloon kind of meandered its way down. But, not like a parachuted object. Most likely, there were government ships in the vicinity to grab the largest debris as it hit the water.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sheshe2 (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:21 PM

29. Even then, that's not guaranteed

That's why the recovery helicopter doesn't launch until the capsule is in the water.

While thankfully we never had all three parachutes fail, we have had 1 fail.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:26 PM

7. One of the early Project Mercury capsules sank at recovery

The astronaut or accident blew the hatch too soon after splash down and the capsule began to take on water, gain weight and the helicopter with cable attached to the capsule could not lift the added weight requiring the capsule to be cut loose and sink.

Things happen. Plans fail.
The astronaut was safe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sanatanadharma (Reply #7)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:34 PM

13. Yup. Gus Grissom's Liberty Bell 7 was recovered in 1999 in nearly 16,000 feet of water.

If we can do that, I think we can handle 47 feet of water.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sanatanadharma (Reply #7)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:57 PM

22. I was glad to read it wasn't Gus..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:29 PM

9. No 1, space capsules are equipped with flotation devices.

I doubt the balloon had one.

No 2. What is the lifting capability of your hypothetical helicopter. I’ve read they estimate that the balloon carried a ton of equipment, in addition to God knows how much weight for the balloon itself, which would be water logged.

No 3. They would have had to use divers anyway. You know, like when the space capsules are recovered. And what are they going to hook on to before that shredded mess sinks? It doesn’t have lifting hooks.

No. 4. 47 feet isn’t exactly the depth of the Titanic. Divers can easily reach it. They can take their time to inspect the debris, figure out what’s there, and how to safely lift it, instead of scrambling while the whole mess was sinking.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:32 PM

10. What....?????

Please be the guy asking people to volunteer to wait under the school bus as it’s shot out of the sky. That thing was destined to sink like a rock. No matter what he did ….it was the wrong thing because people just have to have crap to talk about.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hope22 (Reply #10)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:55 PM

21. Nobody Said The Helicopter Or A Ship Would Be Waiting....

right under the balloon. Both could have been miles away. A helicopter could have been on the scene quickly and on its way to the site as soon as the wreckage hit the water.

If it could snag the wreckage before it sank it might have been able to keep it on or close to the surface till a ship was on the scene.

I heard that the wreckage came down still in U.S. waters and not past 12 miles to land in international waters.

I'm pretty confident that a ship could have been on the scene quickly.

There is probably technology available that we have to predict were the wreckage could have come down - given weather & wind conditions; estimated weight of the balloon; direction of the hit by the pilot; and currents in the ocean.

We have brilliant personnel in the military and they had since Wednesday to work out a number of scenario's to give them data to make such decisions.

My OP was just asking what I thought was a legitimate question. I didn't anticipate fellow DU'ers to take me to task.

Sorry I even brought it up.

Guess we'll just have to wait until the MSM talking heads on the cable news shows tell it like it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #21)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:02 PM

23. Oh. The military people in charge of the recovery must never have thought of those things!

I wonder why they didn't do any of them? Any ideas?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #23)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:21 PM

28. Why do you have to be rude

Is snark replies your thing💀🤙

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sewa (Reply #28)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:25 PM

30. It was a fair question. The OP apparently assumes that the military is incompetent

for failing to do a bunch of things they (supposedly) should have done. I am wondering why the OP thinks the people in charge, experts in these matters, failed to do those things.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:43 PM

35. "The OP apparently assumes that the military is incompetent"

Nonsense - give it a rest.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Disaffected (Reply #35)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:18 PM

56. Nope

It's what was said. Responses are fair.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:26 PM

58. Where did the op say the military was being incompetent?

Op asked a question out of curiosity and you responded with a rude comment.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:33 PM

61. The other day half of DU was suggesting methods to get the balloon.

Mostly ridiculous, but I don’t remember you snarking so much then.

Why attack the OP for asking a question on a discussion board?

I don’t get it.

And come on now, do you really believe the military isn’t capable of incompetence? As a veteran, I can assure that’s not the case.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sewa (Reply #28)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:49 PM

37. This rescue area is in 47 feet of water.. I'm sure our experts can handle it

Sarcasm isn’t rude, necessarily nor in this reply, imo. Ya gotta really sit back n enjoy this crazy show

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #21)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:20 PM

27. It's going to sink WAY faster

than a helicopter can travel 10 miles.

And then what?

Hope that it grappling ring just happens to be sticking up?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #21)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:40 PM

33. Take heart global1.

I thought your question was not unreasonable and, even if it was and was posted in good faith, it would not have warranted the the rude, condescending snark it attracted (which sadly seems too often to be a feature here).

Sheese, even your reasoned response to the snark has drawn more of the same.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Disaffected (Reply #33)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:28 PM

59. +1

I agree, The snark and mockery was inappropriate.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Reply #21)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:26 PM

57. How do you know it wasn't?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:36 PM

15. 20-20 hindsight?

Maybe we need a congressional oversight committee
for balloon debris recovery.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ananda (Reply #15)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:40 PM

17. I'm sure Gym Jordan will get right on it...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:09 PM

24. Maybe, because they are not sure what the balloon was carrying.

 

Something that may explode, something radioactive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:13 PM

25. they will send Air Force divers to retrieve it

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shellback Squid (Reply #25)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:47 PM

36. Air Force Divers?


Navy or CIA divers. There's probably been a ship or sub in the area within half an hour of the downing.

Haele

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to haele (Reply #36)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 05:26 AM

42. The only USAF divers are the ones who aren't supposed to be in the water. :(

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #42)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 11:02 AM

43. Wrong. There are, and have been trained Air Force divers for many years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Air_Force_Combat_Dive_Course

In fact, every branch of the service has trained scuba divers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to onenote (Reply #43)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 11:34 AM

44. I know, it was a bad joke.

When you think of the USAF you don't think of divers.

But yes divers have been pulling flight crews out of the water since WWII.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #44)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:27 AM

47. lol, my post about AF divers was meant as a joke, I stand corrected

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shellback Squid (Reply #47)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:21 AM

51. Sorry I couldn't help myself.

You probably didn't know that as a general rule the AF avoids being in the water at all costs.

If there is a water job, it is going to be the Navy who handles it.
The Navy also has water worthy aircraft, divers, boats, etc.

Yes the USAF probably has divers and water rescue, but their heart and soul is not in the water.
It is in the AIR.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:19 PM

26. Because first it's in the sky ABOVE the helicopter

And it falls in an unpredictable pattern.

And the NASA choppers? They don't launch until the capsule is in the water.

Imagine the embarrassment to the administration if the balloon down one of our choppers!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:26 PM

31. Maybe they could have used

the web of excuses from the Chinese government like a net. Oh wait. Too flimsy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:43 PM

34. My question is this,

why haven't you voiced you're concerns to the military about this supposed lapse in judgement?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:52 PM

38. ...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sat Feb 4, 2023, 11:56 PM

39. JFC! The United States Navy

Is going to find and recover every damn piece of this balloon.

It apparently is spread over about 7 miles of water less than 50" deep.

It was brought down in this area, and it was NOT by accident.

I saw us find and recover an F18 in the middle of the Pacific.

Besides, I am pretty damn sure that we probably know more about the equipment it carried and what it was doing throughout its entire transit than the Chinese do.

Folks that haven't served have no idea how professional, well-equipped and lethal the United States military is.

It may take a little time, but every little piece of equipment will be recovered by the US.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 12:11 AM

40. It's less than 50' deep there, I read...

…it might be quickly handled even with a snorkel

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 05:25 AM

41. Hey global1 you are allowed to ask questions....

Don't get discouraged, everybody is a comedian.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 02:03 PM

45. thanks for the Fox News talking point

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ZonkerHarris (Reply #45)

Sun Feb 5, 2023, 02:20 PM

46. Is Fox Really Asking That Question?....nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:44 AM

48. All this about a....f**k**g,,,,baloon? So what? How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?

You got to be kidding............


What do they want to know??? It is all on the internet.

...................... maps, pictures, whatever...(nude people) whatever...movies, full length and short ones, cartoons, sports,
late night shows, early moring shows, mid day shows, quiz shows, all over the internet..... .and my ideas too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:59 AM

49. How do we know it wasn't?

Because we were not shown any photos?

Or because we were not told about it?

I'm not sure we should make that assumption.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:07 AM

50. People... the balloon never existed and was never shot down...

Don't ask me any questions, I just know these things....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:44 AM

52. Agreed...many obvious to ask questions unanswered. Logic is being burst hourly!

Did the might F22 Raptor missile kill the ballon…or the payload…hit rather low didnt it?

The only thing needing recovery is peoples healthy distrust of government, any government.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:46 AM

53. Agreed...many obvious to ask questions unanswered. Logic is being burst hourly!

Did the might F22 Raptor missile kill the ballon…or the payload…hit rather low didnt it?

The only thing needing recovery is peoples healthy distrust of government, any government.

Show me the beef! 🍔 Double burger 🍔 🍔 if it’s military going public then going silent!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:50 AM

54. Why would anyone here have the answer?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:33 PM

60. Lol, The Debris Field Is 7 Miles Long.

They are going to need a bigger helicopter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to global1 (Original post)

Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:34 PM

62. Maybe it's all BS anyway. The more I think about that stupid balloon, the more I'm wondering

if we haven't all been had by China. Think about it. Why would China, a country with spy satellites and advanced technology, send a giant balloon that might well have had "Chinese Spy Balloon" in neon letters on the side over the reddest areas of the country. They've managed to create a giant brouhaha with Republicans stirred up like bees on crack and it makes me wonder what they're really up to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread