Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:13 PM
global1 (24,451 posts)
Why Wasn't A Recovery Helicopter On The Scene Of The Downed Balloon?....
The helicopter could have been on the scene very fast and maybe could have snagged the wreckage before it sank in 47ft of water. They could maybe kept it afloat until a ship came to the area.
You know like they do NASA recovery of space capsules. Now I hear they have to send divers to recover the debris.
|
62 replies, 2184 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
global1 | Feb 4 | OP |
Ocelot II | Feb 4 | #1 | |
LuckyCharms | Feb 4 | #2 | |
Hekate | Feb 4 | #4 | |
global1 | Feb 4 | #8 | |
Ocelot II | Feb 4 | #12 | |
jeffreyi | Feb 4 | #14 | |
treestar | Feb 4 | #18 | |
Mr.Bill | Feb 4 | #20 | |
likesmountains 52 | Feb 4 | #19 | |
inthewind21 | Feb 6 | #55 | |
packman | Feb 4 | #3 | |
Red Mountain | Feb 4 | #5 | |
FSogol | Feb 4 | #16 | |
sheshe2 | Feb 4 | #6 | |
GoCubsGo | Feb 4 | #11 | |
fescuerescue | Feb 4 | #29 | |
sanatanadharma | Feb 4 | #7 | |
rsdsharp | Feb 4 | #13 | |
bedazzled | Feb 4 | #22 | |
rsdsharp | Feb 4 | #9 | |
Hope22 | Feb 4 | #10 | |
global1 | Feb 4 | #21 | |
Ocelot II | Feb 4 | #23 | |
Sewa | Feb 4 | #28 | |
Ocelot II | Feb 4 | #30 | |
Disaffected | Feb 4 | #35 | |
inthewind21 | Feb 6 | #56 | |
Chautauquas | Feb 6 | #58 | |
BlackSkimmer | Feb 6 | #61 | |
Deuxcents | Feb 4 | #37 | |
fescuerescue | Feb 4 | #27 | |
Disaffected | Feb 4 | #33 | |
Chautauquas | Feb 6 | #59 | |
yardwork | Feb 6 | #57 | |
ananda | Feb 4 | #15 | |
Wounded Bear | Feb 4 | #17 | |
fightforfreedom | Feb 4 | #24 | |
Shellback Squid | Feb 4 | #25 | |
haele | Feb 4 | #36 | |
Irish_Dem | Feb 5 | #42 | |
onenote | Feb 5 | #43 | |
Irish_Dem | Feb 5 | #44 | |
Shellback Squid | Feb 6 | #47 | |
Irish_Dem | Feb 6 | #51 | |
fescuerescue | Feb 4 | #26 | |
moniss | Feb 4 | #31 | |
Dum Aloo | Feb 4 | #32 | |
MarineCombatEngineer | Feb 4 | #34 | |
mcar | Feb 4 | #38 | |
maxrandb | Feb 4 | #39 | |
Drum | Feb 5 | #40 | |
Irish_Dem | Feb 5 | #41 | |
ZonkerHarris | Feb 5 | #45 | |
global1 | Feb 5 | #46 | |
Stuart G | Feb 6 | #48 | |
kentuck | Feb 6 | #49 | |
Chakaconcarne | Feb 6 | #50 | |
Alexander Of Assyria | Feb 6 | #52 | |
Alexander Of Assyria | Feb 6 | #53 | |
Kaleva | Feb 6 | #54 | |
ruet | Feb 6 | #60 | |
Vinca | Feb 6 | #62 |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:14 PM
Ocelot II (106,898 posts)
1. Why aren't you working for the Air Force so you could have told them how to do it right?
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:27 PM
global1 (24,451 posts)
8. I'm Retired...nt
Response to global1 (Reply #8)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:34 PM
Ocelot II (106,898 posts)
12. You could be a consultant, though.
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #12)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:36 PM
jeffreyi (1,795 posts)
14. Yeah.
Set 'em straight, already.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:41 PM
treestar (81,152 posts)
18. perfect answer
to these kinds of questions!
![]() |
Response to treestar (Reply #18)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:52 PM
Mr.Bill (20,196 posts)
20. What are you trying to do,
shut down half of the internet?
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:20 PM
packman (16,296 posts)
3. Do you really think that we aren't going to recover that crap?
No way they are just going to let it sink away into the ocean depths. Yep, divers will get all that shit.
|
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:22 PM
Red Mountain (1,346 posts)
5. I wouldn't really want to be in the boat
close enough to see the bits impact the water and grab them before they could sink.
Would you? |
Response to Red Mountain (Reply #5)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:39 PM
FSogol (43,668 posts)
16. They could get a big baseball glove and catch it.
Easy peasy.
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:26 PM
sheshe2 (78,178 posts)
6. A space capsule is one ship coming down in a direct line
The balloon's debris is now spread in a 7 mile radius. Seven miles.
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #6)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:33 PM
GoCubsGo (31,106 posts)
11. Yes, and space capsules usually float down with three or four parachutes.
Granted the balloon kind of meandered its way down. But, not like a parachuted object. Most likely, there were government ships in the vicinity to grab the largest debris as it hit the water.
|
Response to sheshe2 (Reply #6)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:21 PM
fescuerescue (4,387 posts)
29. Even then, that's not guaranteed
That's why the recovery helicopter doesn't launch until the capsule is in the water.
While thankfully we never had all three parachutes fail, we have had 1 fail. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:26 PM
sanatanadharma (2,664 posts)
7. One of the early Project Mercury capsules sank at recovery
The astronaut or accident blew the hatch too soon after splash down and the capsule began to take on water, gain weight and the helicopter with cable attached to the capsule could not lift the added weight requiring the capsule to be cut loose and sink.
Things happen. Plans fail. The astronaut was safe. |
Response to sanatanadharma (Reply #7)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:34 PM
rsdsharp (7,022 posts)
13. Yup. Gus Grissom's Liberty Bell 7 was recovered in 1999 in nearly 16,000 feet of water.
If we can do that, I think we can handle 47 feet of water.
|
Response to sanatanadharma (Reply #7)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:57 PM
bedazzled (1,518 posts)
22. I was glad to read it wasn't Gus..
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/22/1019254674/gus-grissom-liberty-bell-mercury-the-right-stuff
Was happy he was exonerated! |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:29 PM
rsdsharp (7,022 posts)
9. No 1, space capsules are equipped with flotation devices.
I doubt the balloon had one.
No 2. What is the lifting capability of your hypothetical helicopter. I’ve read they estimate that the balloon carried a ton of equipment, in addition to God knows how much weight for the balloon itself, which would be water logged. No 3. They would have had to use divers anyway. You know, like when the space capsules are recovered. And what are they going to hook on to before that shredded mess sinks? It doesn’t have lifting hooks. No. 4. 47 feet isn’t exactly the depth of the Titanic. Divers can easily reach it. They can take their time to inspect the debris, figure out what’s there, and how to safely lift it, instead of scrambling while the whole mess was sinking. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:32 PM
Hope22 (555 posts)
10. What....?????
Please be the guy asking people to volunteer to wait under the school bus as it’s shot out of the sky. That thing was destined to sink like a rock. No matter what he did ….it was the wrong thing because people just have to have crap to talk about.
|
Response to Hope22 (Reply #10)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:55 PM
global1 (24,451 posts)
21. Nobody Said The Helicopter Or A Ship Would Be Waiting....
right under the balloon. Both could have been miles away. A helicopter could have been on the scene quickly and on its way to the site as soon as the wreckage hit the water.
If it could snag the wreckage before it sank it might have been able to keep it on or close to the surface till a ship was on the scene. I heard that the wreckage came down still in U.S. waters and not past 12 miles to land in international waters. I'm pretty confident that a ship could have been on the scene quickly. There is probably technology available that we have to predict were the wreckage could have come down - given weather & wind conditions; estimated weight of the balloon; direction of the hit by the pilot; and currents in the ocean. We have brilliant personnel in the military and they had since Wednesday to work out a number of scenario's to give them data to make such decisions. My OP was just asking what I thought was a legitimate question. I didn't anticipate fellow DU'ers to take me to task. Sorry I even brought it up. Guess we'll just have to wait until the MSM talking heads on the cable news shows tell it like it is. |
Response to global1 (Reply #21)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:02 PM
Ocelot II (106,898 posts)
23. Oh. The military people in charge of the recovery must never have thought of those things!
I wonder why they didn't do any of them? Any ideas?
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #23)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:21 PM
Sewa (1,076 posts)
28. Why do you have to be rude
Is snark replies your thing💀🤙
|
Response to Sewa (Reply #28)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:25 PM
Ocelot II (106,898 posts)
30. It was a fair question. The OP apparently assumes that the military is incompetent
for failing to do a bunch of things they (supposedly) should have done. I am wondering why the OP thinks the people in charge, experts in these matters, failed to do those things.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:43 PM
Disaffected (3,482 posts)
35. "The OP apparently assumes that the military is incompetent"
Nonsense - give it a rest.
|
Response to Disaffected (Reply #35)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:18 PM
inthewind21 (2,648 posts)
56. Nope
It's what was said. Responses are fair.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:26 PM
Chautauquas (4,253 posts)
58. Where did the op say the military was being incompetent?
Op asked a question out of curiosity and you responded with a rude comment.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #30)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:33 PM
BlackSkimmer (49,045 posts)
61. The other day half of DU was suggesting methods to get the balloon.
Mostly ridiculous, but I don’t remember you snarking so much then.
Why attack the OP for asking a question on a discussion board? I don’t get it. And come on now, do you really believe the military isn’t capable of incompetence? As a veteran, I can assure that’s not the case. ![]() |
Response to Sewa (Reply #28)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:49 PM
Deuxcents (10,104 posts)
37. This rescue area is in 47 feet of water.. I'm sure our experts can handle it
Sarcasm isn’t rude, necessarily nor in this reply, imo. Ya gotta really sit back n enjoy this crazy show
|
Response to global1 (Reply #21)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:20 PM
fescuerescue (4,387 posts)
27. It's going to sink WAY faster
than a helicopter can travel 10 miles.
And then what? Hope that it grappling ring just happens to be sticking up? |
Response to global1 (Reply #21)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:40 PM
Disaffected (3,482 posts)
33. Take heart global1.
I thought your question was not unreasonable and, even if it was and was posted in good faith, it would not have warranted the the rude, condescending snark it attracted (which sadly seems too often to be a feature here).
Sheese, even your reasoned response to the snark has drawn more of the same. ![]() |
Response to Disaffected (Reply #33)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:28 PM
Chautauquas (4,253 posts)
59. +1
I agree, The snark and mockery was inappropriate.
|
Response to global1 (Reply #21)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:26 PM
yardwork (55,978 posts)
57. How do you know it wasn't?
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:36 PM
ananda (27,533 posts)
15. 20-20 hindsight?
Maybe we need a congressional oversight committee
for balloon debris recovery. ![]() |
Response to ananda (Reply #15)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 08:40 PM
Wounded Bear (55,371 posts)
17. I'm sure Gym Jordan will get right on it...
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:09 PM
fightforfreedom (4,913 posts)
24. Maybe, because they are not sure what the balloon was carrying.
Something that may explode, something radioactive.
|
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:13 PM
Shellback Squid (8,674 posts)
25. they will send Air Force divers to retrieve it
Response to Shellback Squid (Reply #25)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:47 PM
haele (11,824 posts)
36. Air Force Divers?
![]() Navy or CIA divers. There's probably been a ship or sub in the area within half an hour of the downing. Haele |
Response to haele (Reply #36)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 05:26 AM
Irish_Dem (35,593 posts)
42. The only USAF divers are the ones who aren't supposed to be in the water. :(
Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #42)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 11:02 AM
onenote (39,413 posts)
43. Wrong. There are, and have been trained Air Force divers for many years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Air_Force_Combat_Dive_Course
In fact, every branch of the service has trained scuba divers. |
Response to onenote (Reply #43)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 11:34 AM
Irish_Dem (35,593 posts)
44. I know, it was a bad joke.
When you think of the USAF you don't think of divers.
But yes divers have been pulling flight crews out of the water since WWII. |
Response to Irish_Dem (Reply #44)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:27 AM
Shellback Squid (8,674 posts)
47. lol, my post about AF divers was meant as a joke, I stand corrected
Response to Shellback Squid (Reply #47)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:21 AM
Irish_Dem (35,593 posts)
51. Sorry I couldn't help myself.
You probably didn't know that as a general rule the AF avoids being in the water at all costs.
If there is a water job, it is going to be the Navy who handles it. The Navy also has water worthy aircraft, divers, boats, etc. Yes the USAF probably has divers and water rescue, but their heart and soul is not in the water. It is in the AIR. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:19 PM
fescuerescue (4,387 posts)
26. Because first it's in the sky ABOVE the helicopter
And it falls in an unpredictable pattern.
And the NASA choppers? They don't launch until the capsule is in the water. Imagine the embarrassment to the administration if the balloon down one of our choppers! |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:26 PM
moniss (1,285 posts)
31. Maybe they could have used
the web of excuses from the Chinese government like a net. Oh wait. Too flimsy.
|
Response to global1 (Original post)
Dum Aloo This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 09:43 PM
MarineCombatEngineer (9,168 posts)
34. My question is this,
why haven't you voiced you're concerns to the military about this supposed lapse in judgement?
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sat Feb 4, 2023, 11:56 PM
maxrandb (13,820 posts)
39. JFC! The United States Navy
Is going to find and recover every damn piece of this balloon.
It apparently is spread over about 7 miles of water less than 50" deep. It was brought down in this area, and it was NOT by accident. I saw us find and recover an F18 in the middle of the Pacific. Besides, I am pretty damn sure that we probably know more about the equipment it carried and what it was doing throughout its entire transit than the Chinese do. Folks that haven't served have no idea how professional, well-equipped and lethal the United States military is. It may take a little time, but every little piece of equipment will be recovered by the US. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 12:11 AM
Drum (7,931 posts)
40. It's less than 50' deep there, I read...
…it might be quickly handled even with a snorkel
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 05:25 AM
Irish_Dem (35,593 posts)
41. Hey global1 you are allowed to ask questions....
Don't get discouraged, everybody is a comedian.
![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 02:03 PM
ZonkerHarris (22,374 posts)
45. thanks for the Fox News talking point
Response to ZonkerHarris (Reply #45)
Sun Feb 5, 2023, 02:20 PM
global1 (24,451 posts)
46. Is Fox Really Asking That Question?....nt
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:44 AM
Stuart G (36,589 posts)
48. All this about a....f**k**g,,,,baloon? So what? How much wood can a woodchuck chuck?
You got to be kidding............
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() What do they want to know??? It is all on the internet. ...................... maps, pictures, whatever...(nude people) whatever...movies, full length and short ones, cartoons, sports, late night shows, early moring shows, mid day shows, quiz shows, all over the internet..... .and my ideas too ![]() |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 10:59 AM
kentuck (108,798 posts)
49. How do we know it wasn't?
Because we were not shown any photos?
Or because we were not told about it? I'm not sure we should make that assumption. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:07 AM
Chakaconcarne (1,835 posts)
50. People... the balloon never existed and was never shot down...
Don't ask me any questions, I just know these things....
|
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:44 AM
Alexander Of Assyria (4,612 posts)
52. Agreed...many obvious to ask questions unanswered. Logic is being burst hourly!
Did the might F22 Raptor missile kill the ballon…or the payload…hit rather low didnt it?
The only thing needing recovery is peoples healthy distrust of government, any government. |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:46 AM
Alexander Of Assyria (4,612 posts)
53. Agreed...many obvious to ask questions unanswered. Logic is being burst hourly!
Did the might F22 Raptor missile kill the ballon…or the payload…hit rather low didnt it?
The only thing needing recovery is peoples healthy distrust of government, any government. Show me the beef! 🍔 Double burger 🍔 🍔 if it’s military going public then going silent! |
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 11:50 AM
Kaleva (34,012 posts)
54. Why would anyone here have the answer?
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:33 PM
ruet (9,863 posts)
60. Lol, The Debris Field Is 7 Miles Long.
They are going to need a bigger helicopter.
|
Response to global1 (Original post)
Mon Feb 6, 2023, 02:34 PM
Vinca (49,170 posts)
62. Maybe it's all BS anyway. The more I think about that stupid balloon, the more I'm wondering
if we haven't all been had by China. Think about it. Why would China, a country with spy satellites and advanced technology, send a giant balloon that might well have had "Chinese Spy Balloon" in neon letters on the side over the reddest areas of the country. They've managed to create a giant brouhaha with Republicans stirred up like bees on crack and it makes me wonder what they're really up to.
|