Tue Jan 17, 2023, 05:04 PM
kpete (71,074 posts)
Fed Judge delivers guilty verdict for Jan 6 defendant who "followed President Trump's instructions."
JUST IN: Federal judge delivers a Jan. 6. guilty verdict for defendant Danean MacAndrew but makes clear she views Macandrew as having "followed President Trump's instructions."
The Court need not rest solely on this Meija axiom, however. Indeed, in advance of the rally, Defendant tweeted at then-President Trump that she too felt that “[t]raps had been set” in the “#RiggedElection” of 2020. Gov.’s Ex. 114. On January 6, she even identified with her fellow “Patriots” who had been pepper sprayed breaching the Capitol in support of former President Trump. Gov.’s Ex. 124. And at the “Stop the Steal” rally, then-President Trump eponymously exhorted his supporters to, in fact, stop the steal by marching to the Capitol. Defendant marched to the Capitol where, she testified, she understood that only Congress had the power to fix the election’s outcome and that Congress was likely in session while she was around and in the Capitol. Having followed then-President Trump’s instructions, which were in line with her stated desires, the Court therefore finds that Defendant intended her presence to be disruptive to Congressional business. III. Conclusion Beyond a reasonable doubt, Danean MacAndrew knew on January 6, 2021 that her actions at the Capitol were unlawful. Every step of the way, from the western boundary of Capitol grounds, to the West Lawn, to the Upper West Terrace, to the interior of the Capitol itself, she saw sign after sign that her presence was unlawful. Nevertheless, heeding the call of former President Trump, she continued onwards to “stop the steal.” For her participation in the insurrection of January 6, the Court finds Danean MacAndrew GUILTY on Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4. Dated: January 17, 2023 https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2021cr0730-59 Link to tweet ?s=20&t=qCwUu2us8dZQiLqJWwZYXA
|
4 replies, 637 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
kpete | Jan 2023 | OP |
grumpyduck | Jan 2023 | #1 | |
Chainfire | Jan 2023 | #2 | |
LetMyPeopleVote | Jan 2023 | #3 | |
ProfessorGAC | Jan 2023 | #4 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 17, 2023, 05:15 PM
grumpyduck (5,582 posts)
1. But, but, but judge, he told me to do it.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 17, 2023, 05:20 PM
Chainfire (13,678 posts)
2. And the Nuremberg defense fails yet again.
Too bad, so sad...
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Tue Jan 17, 2023, 05:22 PM
LetMyPeopleVote (130,007 posts)
3. The public authority defense is a stupid defense.
Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #3)
Tue Jan 17, 2023, 06:11 PM
ProfessorGAC (59,039 posts)
4. Ya Think?!?
The way they're framing it, they have to admit guilt.
Admitting guilt is a pretty stupid way to defend one's self. |