General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerica’s Leftward Tilt?
http://campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/03/americas-leftward-tilt/The reality is that our government hasnt become this dysfunctional because the parties are so polarized. Its because there is only one pole in American politics today, and its magnetic field is so powerful that it has drawn both parties in the same direction rightward. And it is in that same direction that the magnetic field of contemporary American politics is likely to pull the stories the two parties tell after the election and the policies the winner pursues.
The data, however, suggest just the opposite that both candidates have benefited in the general election every time they have taken a left turn. President Obama was in deep political trouble 15 months ago when he cut the closest thing he could to a grand bargain with House Speaker John A. Boehner to slash the federal budget by trillions, and he did nothing for his popularity nine months earlier when he extended the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy. Not until he began talking like a populist did he begin picking up steam in the polls. Indeed, one of the most powerful messages the Democrats chose not to use in the 2010 midterm elections which would have supported a policy that was extremely popular then and remains as popular now was a simple message on taxes I tested nationally, which won in every region and with every demographic, including Tea Partyers: In tough times like these, millionaires ought to be giving to charity, not getting it. Once that position (and other populist appeals) became central to Mr. Obamas presidential campaign, the election looked like it would be a rout.
...
SO what underlies this powerful pull to the right? Many factors, but two stand out. The first is campaign money. When Americans saw the scope of the savings and loan scandal in the 1980s, which today seems like just a bad day on the unregulated derivatives market, Ronald Reagans attorney general, Edwin Meese III, put nearly a thousand bankers behind bars. In contrast, Mr. Obamas attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., cant seem to smell the stench of a fraud that cost millions of people their jobs or homes.
...
Then came the conservative movement that ushered in Reagan, whose ideology has dominated our political discourse ever since, even after its proven failure. If Nixon and Bill Clinton were the last gasps of Roosevelts breath, then Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama and perhaps Mr. Romney may well be the last gasps of Reagans. If the centrifugal pull of the 2012 election is likely to be to the right, is there any potential counterweight?
uponit7771
(90,302 posts)...straight to the American people with a consistent party message then FAUX can paint his failures as his only like they tried to do in this election.
Krugman was right...his advise should've been taken in regards to asking for 1.5 trillion for the stimulus and then if he didn't get it blame it on the GOP all along.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Thanks to the delusional and entitled GOP.
Krugman is absolutely correct. Let's hope President Obama does what Krugman advises in his second term or there'll be more gridlock since the American people have seemingly not learned from their mistakes, and Congress is not changing in favor of the Democrats.
I sure do hope President Obama does something about election reform. The crap the Republicans are pulling in the battleground states needs to STOP.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)Because they don't comprehend what they receive from government.
Social issues, however, are another issue, which is why the right has tried for years to obscure economic issues with social conservatism.
PSPS
(13,580 posts)The writer is right in that perhaps the most corrupting influence is money in politics. You have a small handful of billionaire parasites who, in other times or places, would be gutted in front of their children and then strung up in the public square. Instead, they openly buy the government and skate any responsibility.
The other difference is the concentration of media ownership today. I guess it's related. A cabal of six corporations own virtually every media outlet. So any responsible discourse on the problems we have is effectively suppressed.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)No matter who has won elections, over the years we keep getting dragged further to the right on economic issues.
A lot of the big decisions are made totally outside the democratic process. For most of us there is no way to vote against the interests of oil companies, defense contractors or big banks.