Fri Aug 5, 2022, 06:58 PM
Grasswire2 (12,229 posts)
Article: The Director of the FBI Helped to Overturn Roe v. Wade
[link:https://shero.substack.com/p/the-director-of-the-fbi-helped-to?r=nl8r&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email|
snip But, according to their Judiciary Committee questionnaires, both Wray and Kavanaugh each joined the Federalist Society upon starting Yale Law and continued as members up through the Trump administration. Wray was two years behind Kavanaugh at Yale College, and Wray then joined Kavanaugh at Yale Law. Moreover, in the George W. Bush administration, Kavanaugh and Wray were political appointees and colleagues — Wray was a senior aide to the deputy attorney general, and Kavanaugh was in the White House Counsel’s office. Kavanaugh would have worked closely with the Justice Department on nominations and other confirmation matters and Wray would often have intersected with the White House Counsel’s Office in his position at Justice in the criminal division. Here is an excerpt from a Politico article on conservative white men becoming high-ups in the federal government and their connections to Yale and the Federalist Society: “The Federalist Society has famously shaped the federal judiciary since its founding, promoting candidates who follow a small-government, socially conservative and textualist interpretation of the Constitution. Every member of the Supreme Court appointed by a Republican since Clarence Thomas in 1991 has been a Federalist. Trump has bragged that The Federalist Society provided him the list of Supreme Court nominees from which he has so far selected Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. The goal of shaping the federal judiciary unites the Trump and the Never-Trump wings of the Republican Party.” Another term of art used to describe these conservative devotees who are purposely filtered into top governmental positions is the longstanding preference of candidates who are “Pale, Male, Yale.” much, much more at link
|
12 replies, 1096 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Grasswire2 | Aug 5 | OP |
onecaliberal | Aug 5 | #1 | |
SheltieLover | Aug 5 | #2 | |
triron | Aug 5 | #3 | |
Baitball Blogger | Aug 5 | #4 | |
Grasswire2 | Aug 5 | #5 | |
Baitball Blogger | Aug 5 | #6 | |
Hermit-The-Prog | Aug 5 | #7 | |
UTUSN | Aug 5 | #8 | |
Solly Mack | Aug 5 | #9 | |
FakeNoose | Aug 5 | #10 | |
Grasswire2 | Aug 5 | #11 | |
Grasswire2 | Aug 5 | #12 |
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 06:59 PM
onecaliberal (25,926 posts)
1. Yes he did and lied to the American people about it.
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 07:10 PM
SheltieLover (44,127 posts)
2. Why has Wray not been replaced?
![]() ![]() |
Response to SheltieLover (Reply #2)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 07:16 PM
triron (20,254 posts)
3. Biden is derelict here.
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 10:11 PM
Baitball Blogger (43,397 posts)
4. Absolutely.
Playing dumb is what white males in high positions do best.
Don't let him get away with it. This stinks to high heaven. |
Response to Baitball Blogger (Reply #4)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 10:22 PM
Grasswire2 (12,229 posts)
5. his remarks to Senator Whitehouse were outrageous
And if we can't trust him to tell the truth about the Kavanaugh investigation, how do we know he's telling the truth about any other investigation? |
Response to Grasswire2 (Reply #5)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 10:36 PM
Baitball Blogger (43,397 posts)
6. It's obvious one Federalist Society member helped another.
We should ALL be outraged!
![]() |
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 10:47 PM
Hermit-The-Prog (21,458 posts)
7. Obviously, his allegiance to Federalist Society is greater than his allegiance to the United States.
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 10:56 PM
UTUSN (64,821 posts)
8. Talk about "swamp" invasive style
Response to Grasswire2 (Original post)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 11:27 PM
FakeNoose (24,989 posts)
10. The Director of the FBI is supposed to be a 10-year term
It's not a position that would normally be included in the President's appointment powers. Only when a 10-year contract expires, that's when the next director is selected. Chump changed all that when he fired James Comey for political reasons. (Comey had been appointed by Obama, even though he wasn't a Democrat.)
![]() |
Response to FakeNoose (Reply #10)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 11:48 PM
Grasswire2 (12,229 posts)
11. Here is the applicable law.
The term may be no MORE THAN ten years. From Public Law 94-503 October 1976 https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/94/503.pdf TERM OF FBI DIRECTOR SEC. 203. Section 1101 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by inserting " ![]() "SEC. 1101." and by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection: " (b) Effective with respect to any individual appointment by the Effective date. President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, after June 1,1973, the term of service of the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall be ten years. A Director may not serve more than one ten-year term. The provisions of subsections (a) through (c) of section 8335 of title 5, United States Code, shall apply to any individual appointed under this section.". That amendment was made after Hoover served multiple decades. |
Response to Grasswire2 (Reply #11)
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 11:52 PM
Grasswire2 (12,229 posts)
12. In 1993, President Clinton removed Bill Sessions
So there is precedent. Here's what the Constitution Center says: Since 1968, a federal law has provided that the FBI Director serves a 10-year term in office. But the Director’s ability to serve a full term depends upon retaining the confidence of the President. And the FBI Director, like all “civil officers of the United States,” can be removed from office if charged with “high crimes and misdemeanors” by the House of Representatives and removed by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, under the Constitution’s Impeachment Clauses. Removing an FBI Director, either through executive or legislative branch action, is politically risky. Back in 1993, Sessions’ dismissal drew protests from some members of Congress, but the lawmakers took no action to block the appointment of a successor after the firing. |