HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » How "legit" is the Britis...

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:28 AM

How "legit" is the British "documentarian"?

Last edited Thu Jun 23, 2022, 06:30 AM - Edit history (1)

Reportedly. a British "documentarian " has documented about 11 hours of the Trump family up to January 6th. Was he hired by the Trump family to do a fluff piece or is he actual real documentarian?

I could understand if the Committee was a little skeptical of the story. Is it a true story in real time or is it a piece of propaganda?

Also, the Committee will be studying the "documentary" while they are on an extended break before their next Hearing.

They must be very careful not to interfere with the DOJ investigation.

8 replies, 803 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply How "legit" is the British "documentarian"? (Original post)
kentuck Thursday OP
BigmanPigman Thursday #1
FelineOverlord Thursday #2
EarlG Thursday #3
blogslug Thursday #4
Shellback Squid Thursday #5
H2O Man Thursday #6
FelineOverlord Thursday #7
calimary Thursday #8

Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:37 AM

1. I'm fairly certain that the committee

wouldn't mention it unless they were sure of its content and why it was made. They have been very careful when mentioning anything about the investigation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink



Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:41 AM

3. I think he was hired to do a fluff piece

But itís not a fluff piece until itís edited and all the bad stuff is chopped out. The committee is getting raw footage so who knows whatís in it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:47 AM

4. film is film and video is video

The committee asked for all the footage, including the raw footage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:48 AM

5. legit

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:01 AM

6. Recommended.

Based on what I've heard and read, it sounds real. This Committee doesn't seem to make mistakes. But Trump does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kentuck (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 02:29 PM

7. The Trumps did not have editorial control. Full stop.

The filmmaker tweets.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FelineOverlord (Reply #7)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 11:33 PM

8. EXCELLENT. That's what gives it more credibility.

They werenít able to get their dirty fingerprints all over it, evidently.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread