![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
kpete | Saturday | OP |
niyad | Saturday | #1 | |
MineralMan | Saturday | #2 | |
Mr. Steve | Saturday | #3 | |
Post removed | Saturday | #4 | |
CrackityJones75 | Saturday | #8 | |
Bird Lady | Saturday | #9 | |
demmiblue | Saturday | #10 | |
CrackityJones75 | Saturday | #11 | |
soldierant | Saturday | #21 | |
CrackityJones75 | Saturday | #22 | |
Stuart G | Saturday | #5 | |
CaliforniaPeggy | Saturday | #6 | |
judesedit | Saturday | #7 | |
Texin | Saturday | #14 | |
Rebl2 | Saturday | #12 | |
Submariner | Saturday | #13 | |
Roy Rolling | Saturday | #15 | |
Texin | Saturday | #16 | |
2Gingersnaps | Saturday | #20 | |
Joinfortmill | Saturday | #17 | |
Demovictory9 | Saturday | #18 | |
BlueJac | Saturday | #19 | |
Dark n Stormy Knight | Sunday | #23 |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 10:54 AM
niyad (86,831 posts)
1. KNR plus a gazillion.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 10:56 AM
MineralMan (143,537 posts)
2. Yes, and neither should other women add restrictions on reproductive choice.
Nobody should. That's an individual right, and not subject to society's laws.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:00 AM
Mr. Steve (86 posts)
3. Simplicity itself
Laws are for the betterment and protection of society. These laws are from naught but fear of the strong and independent woman.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #4)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:15 AM
CrackityJones75 (2,123 posts)
8. See this is the stupid stuff that I just hate reading here
So all the good Democratic men shouldn't be making laws? Because why?
This type of posting does nothing to help. At all. |
Response to CrackityJones75 (Reply #8)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:19 AM
Bird Lady (1,604 posts)
9. This is the kind of thing I expect...
From people who are incapable of taking a joke or even understanding where it comes from.
You are not required to read my posts if they bother you, won't hurt my feelings. |
Response to Bird Lady (Reply #9)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:22 AM
demmiblue (33,503 posts)
10. Amen, sister!
![]() |
Response to Bird Lady (Reply #9)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:24 AM
CrackityJones75 (2,123 posts)
11. You are right, I am not required to read your posts.
I read your posts because I see them. I also comment on them because I can.
Oh.... it wax a joke. I get it. This is all so super funny. |
Response to CrackityJones75 (Reply #8)
Sat May 14, 2022, 09:44 PM
soldierant (3,822 posts)
21. Good Democratic men
don't need to be told not to make laws about women's bodies, or indeed about anything scientific they don't know anything about. Good Democratic men are smart enough not to want to do that - at the very least, without taking multiple expert opinions.
If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it. |
Response to soldierant (Reply #21)
Sat May 14, 2022, 09:50 PM
CrackityJones75 (2,123 posts)
22. Of course democratic men make laws concerning women's bodies
Of course democratic men make laws concerning women's bodies.
Taking away someones right to bodily autonomy is not something that anyone should be doing. Of we are going to go down a road where only men can write laws that effect men and only women can do the same for women…. Then we are supremely fucked. We will have to have two sets of laws for everything. That is stupid. But what cannot happen is forcing anyone to not have autonomy over their own body. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:01 AM
Stuart G (33,779 posts)
5. Thank You for Posting & Sharing With Us...K and R
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:04 AM
CaliforniaPeggy (141,737 posts)
6. A big fat K&R!
![]() |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:11 AM
judesedit (2,767 posts)
7. Ladies, refuse men sex for awhile. Professionals, too. We'll see how long this lasts
![]() |
Response to judesedit (Reply #7)
Sat May 14, 2022, 12:31 PM
Texin (2,312 posts)
14. Problem with that is the notion that women will even have a choice in the matter to have sex.
The provisions against rape and incest in respect to abortions effectively render rape and incest no longer crimes, therefore men can rape at will without consequence. And they will. You know they will.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 11:47 AM
Rebl2 (6,379 posts)
12. Maybe it's
time to make some laws about men’s bodies and see what they think about that.
|
Response to kpete (Original post)
Submariner This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 12:32 PM
Roy Rolling (5,743 posts)
15. Be Careful
Oversimplification is the enemy, because it makes for great sound bites at the expense of truth and effectiveness. That’s how propagandists send people down a rabbit hole of futile argument.
MEN AND WOMEN SHOULDN’T BE MAKING LAWS ABOUT A WOMAN’S BODY. Nor should men or women make a decision on the health and safety of a woman’s baby. EVER. Making the issue a MEN vs. WOMEN issue is just what propagandists want liberals to do. Don’t fall for it. |
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 12:37 PM
Texin (2,312 posts)
16. If women will no longer have choice, men should probably be forced to have permanently limp dicks.
Viagra and all other boner juice should be permanently banned from use.
|
Response to Texin (Reply #16)
Sat May 14, 2022, 07:32 PM
2Gingersnaps (896 posts)
20. Certainly should be paid for completely out of pocket instead of at taxpayer expense.
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sat May 14, 2022, 02:28 PM
Joinfortmill (6,179 posts)
17. Amen to that
Response to kpete (Original post)
Sun May 15, 2022, 02:14 AM
Dark n Stormy Knight (9,294 posts)
23. + about a million.
Those MFers never should have been referred to by the media or Democrats as "Pro Life." Anti- Dems, or Dems fighting against the death penalty or for health care for all ought to have adopted that name for themselves.
|