HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Yes, it's that simple.

Sat May 14, 2022, 09:53 AM

Yes, it's that simple.



23 replies, 5810 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 23 replies Author Time Post
Reply Yes, it's that simple. (Original post)
kpete Saturday OP
niyad Saturday #1
MineralMan Saturday #2
Mr. Steve Saturday #3
Post removed Saturday #4
CrackityJones75 Saturday #8
Bird Lady Saturday #9
demmiblue Saturday #10
CrackityJones75 Saturday #11
soldierant Saturday #21
CrackityJones75 Saturday #22
Stuart G Saturday #5
CaliforniaPeggy Saturday #6
judesedit Saturday #7
Texin Saturday #14
Rebl2 Saturday #12
Submariner Saturday #13
Roy Rolling Saturday #15
Texin Saturday #16
2Gingersnaps Saturday #20
Joinfortmill Saturday #17
Demovictory9 Saturday #18
BlueJac Saturday #19
Dark n Stormy Knight Sunday #23

Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 10:54 AM

1. KNR plus a gazillion.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 10:56 AM

2. Yes, and neither should other women add restrictions on reproductive choice.

Nobody should. That's an individual right, and not subject to society's laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:00 AM

3. Simplicity itself

Laws are for the betterment and protection of society. These laws are from naught but fear of the strong and independent woman.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)


Response to Post removed (Reply #4)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:15 AM

8. See this is the stupid stuff that I just hate reading here

So all the good Democratic men shouldn't be making laws? Because why?

This type of posting does nothing to help. At all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CrackityJones75 (Reply #8)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:19 AM

9. This is the kind of thing I expect...

From people who are incapable of taking a joke or even understanding where it comes from.
You are not required to read my posts if they bother you, won't hurt my feelings.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bird Lady (Reply #9)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:22 AM

10. Amen, sister!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bird Lady (Reply #9)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:24 AM

11. You are right, I am not required to read your posts.

I read your posts because I see them. I also comment on them because I can.

Oh.... it wax a joke. I get it. This is all so super funny.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CrackityJones75 (Reply #8)

Sat May 14, 2022, 09:44 PM

21. Good Democratic men

don't need to be told not to make laws about women's bodies, or indeed about anything scientific they don't know anything about. Good Democratic men are smart enough not to want to do that - at the very least, without taking multiple expert opinions.

If the shoe doesn't fit, don't wear it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to soldierant (Reply #21)

Sat May 14, 2022, 09:50 PM

22. Of course democratic men make laws concerning women's bodies

Of course democratic men make laws concerning women's bodies.

Taking away someones right to bodily autonomy is not something that anyone should be doing.


Of we are going to go down a road where only men can write laws that effect men and only women can do the same for women…. Then we are supremely fucked.

We will have to have two sets of laws for everything. That is stupid. But what cannot happen is forcing anyone to not have autonomy over their own body.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:01 AM

5. Thank You for Posting & Sharing With Us...K and R

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:04 AM

6. A big fat K&R!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:11 AM

7. Ladies, refuse men sex for awhile. Professionals, too. We'll see how long this lasts

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to judesedit (Reply #7)

Sat May 14, 2022, 12:31 PM

14. Problem with that is the notion that women will even have a choice in the matter to have sex.

The provisions against rape and incest in respect to abortions effectively render rape and incest no longer crimes, therefore men can rape at will without consequence. And they will. You know they will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 11:47 AM

12. Maybe it's

time to make some laws about men’s bodies and see what they think about that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 12:32 PM

15. Be Careful

Oversimplification is the enemy, because it makes for great sound bites at the expense of truth and effectiveness. That’s how propagandists send people down a rabbit hole of futile argument.

MEN AND WOMEN SHOULDN’T BE MAKING LAWS ABOUT A WOMAN’S BODY. Nor should men or women make a decision on the health and safety of a woman’s baby. EVER.

Making the issue a MEN vs. WOMEN issue is just what propagandists want liberals to do. Don’t fall for it.


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 12:37 PM

16. If women will no longer have choice, men should probably be forced to have permanently limp dicks.

Viagra and all other boner juice should be permanently banned from use.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Texin (Reply #16)

Sat May 14, 2022, 07:32 PM

20. Certainly should be paid for completely out of pocket instead of at taxpayer expense.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 02:28 PM

17. Amen to that

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 03:37 PM

18. K&r

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sat May 14, 2022, 04:39 PM

19. Agree 100%!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to kpete (Original post)

Sun May 15, 2022, 02:14 AM

23. + about a million.

Those MFers never should have been referred to by the media or Democrats as "Pro Life." Anti- Dems, or Dems fighting against the death penalty or for health care for all ought to have adopted that name for themselves.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread