Fri May 13, 2022, 07:13 PM
10 replies, 928 views
 10 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Why Anita Hill wants us to take the long view on the Supreme Court (Original post) |
In It to Win It | May 13 | OP |
| Irish_Dem | May 13 | #1 | |
| LakeArenal | May 13 | #2 | |
| uponit7771 | May 14 | #10 | |
| dem4decades | May 13 | #3 | |
| Solly Mack | May 13 | #4 | |
| BootinUp | May 13 | #5 | |
| UTUSN | May 13 | #6 | |
| In It to Win It | May 13 | #7 | |
| UTUSN | May 13 | #8 | |
| UTUSN | May 13 | #9 |
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 07:14 PM
Irish_Dem (24,143 posts)
1. She doesn't understand that the SC is bought and paid for.
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 07:19 PM
LakeArenal (22,035 posts)
2. And if it doesn't...?
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 07:26 PM
3. If the court had integrity, it wouldn't have liars on it. Or Justices seemingly obstructing
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 07:44 PM
Solly Mack (86,431 posts)
4. There is no integrity in racism, misogyny, homophobia, bigotry.
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 08:52 PM
BootinUp (42,270 posts)
5. I saw what she did there. K&R
Response to In It to Win It (Original post)
Fri May 13, 2022, 10:31 PM
UTUSN (63,847 posts)
6. Yeah well, Clarence is still there
Response to In It to Win It (Reply #7)
Fri May 13, 2022, 10:35 PM
UTUSN (63,847 posts)
8. Well if Joan CRAWFORD croaked ...
Response to UTUSN (Reply #8)
Fri May 13, 2022, 10:41 PM
UTUSN (63,847 posts)
9. For anybody not getting the reference:
