I could not believe many of the comments I received earlier today about General Flynn.

May I shared your note with her?

She didn't serve - but my dad was an Officer/Green Beret late 50's to mid/late 70's. She's been appalled at the lack of honor displayed by Flynn.

Not long after said pardon was issued, I recall reading that it was not, nor were those issued for Bannon and Roger Stone.

because you are right, he should face some consequences for his actions.

I’m tempted to add that ask to whatever I call my Congressman/Senators about.

Okay, maybe they’re not in a position (or the right committee) to do anything about it.

HOWEVER… that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t know that it’s an issue for their constituents. It doesn’t mean they shouldn’t get a push or at least a nudge about it.

Remember: they may not be able to do anything significant about it. BUT they’re in Washington DC on our nickel. All day everyday they’re gonna be working with somebody who CAN do something about it. Inevitably. And if a drumbeat starts back home, and/or people are starting to call about it, then it’s on the radar screen. And it just might be something that they decide to have some staffer start looking into it.

AND - word just might start getting around because somebody else in some other Congressmember’s district is calling about this same issue too. They go to lunch together and breakfast meetings together and committee meetings together and cocktail parties together and zoom meetings and conference calls together and … … …

And then it starts becoming “a thing.” “A thing” that starts demanding more attention.

It could also be that maybe your rep actually IS bothered by the same issue “but nobody’s called about it so why bother with that because my people are all calling about taxes/trump/security/benefits/voting rights/the weather …” But now it turns to “hmmm, I guess maybe it’s not just me, after all. I’m starting to get calls about this. Maybe this actually IS something my constituents are bothered about? Maybe I should look into it…”

THAT’S why it’s good to start making noise about it. We’re at the bottom of the influence food chain. But if there’s enough of us starting to rumble about it, it’ll get heard and start having an impact higher up that chain. And THAT’S how changes can be made.

Don’t forget the impact your calls have on the staff. The people who answer the phones - in the district and in the DC office. They’re the ones on the front lines - the ones who’ll hear from you first. And they keep notes and tally sheets so they can keep track of the calls. Who, from where, about what, and how many about what. Cuz their boss (the legislator) isn’t answering those phones but DOES need to know what his/her constituents are calling about and are pushing for action about. Because that means it’s something that’s demanding his/her attention.

Don’t forget this.

Yes, they have the privilege of public service in the Halls of Congress but they're the bottom rung of the ladder. Voice your concerns but don't take your frustrations out on them. Their jobs probably suck in many ways...don't make them suck more.

I know my congressman's staffters are not only low paid but forced to run personal errands for the Congressman and his wife. That's reom the recently released results of an unvestigation into him

Absolutely be nice to the staffers.

I've never called and been abusive. Just doesn't seem fair to the frontline folks who absolutely do work for pittance - when they're even paid at all. I wonder if a lot of the folks who answer the phones are interns or even volunteers who are working for free. Whoever is answering the phone probably already takes plenty of abuse from other jerks with entitlement complexes who call in.

That is all.

to be able to even consider bringing it up with your legislators. Here in OK, it's nothing more than a waste of breath - mine and the hot air, along with a big sack of bullshit, I always get in return.

I'd CALL, Dammit!

I kind like imagining that members of the red-team wrecking crew get calls from the blue teasers and the more they get, the more uncomfortable and surrounded and overpowered they feel. And if they aren't on MY team, I WANT them feeling unbalanced, knocked off their game, like the walls closing in, nervous about what to do, unsure and questioning their positions on the issues.

Destabilize the enemy.

Only spinning my wheels to no effect.

If you get a shitload of spinning wheels -all spinning about the same complaint, they’re liable to run right over him/her.

You've no idea what it's like, so let it go.

As a veteran I cannot post how I feel about Flynn. It would be deleted for being too vulgar.

No it hasn't.

You are not telling the truth.

In the recent decision saying it is unconstitutional, the US District Court for the District of Columbia said:

"The lack of any Supreme Court case addressing the question is likely due in part to the fact that in the 70-year period since the UCMJ explicitly authorized such jurisdiction, the military has so rarely chosen to exercise it. See Bishop, supra note 3, at 332; J. Mackey Ives & Michael J. Davidson, Court-Martial Jurisdiction Over Retirees Under Articles 2(4) and 2(6): Time to Lighten Up and Tighten Up? , 175 Mil. L. Rev. 1, 11(2003)." Larrabee v. Braithwaite, 502 F. Supp. 3d 322, 330 n.8 (D.D.C. 2020)

That seems rather over the top to go straight to an accusation.

"Lying" is consciously not telling the truth when one knows it.

Not telling the truth is simply not telling the truth.

The fact of the matter is that in the thread he is complaining about, a link to Larrabee v. Braithwaite was provided, along with a summary of relevant passages. So, it is not as if current, relevant law is unknown to the poster.

It is odd to want the "rule of law" and not actually care what courts have said about it.

If you would like to know exactly what would happen in the proposed scenario, you can too:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.204940/gov.uscourts.dcd.204940.28.0.pdf

As to how "routinely" this happens - that is a factual assertion which is either true or not true.

Strongly implies if not outright states the person is deliberately misleading. Why not simply state they're mistaken?

The connotation of “not telling the truth” is that they’re lying, and is a bit harsh. You’re mistaken” would come across better.

That is absolutely what is implied.

To say "What you are saying is not factual" or "You are saying something that is wrong" or "I think you have misunderstood the facts" is to offer them a space in which they may be speaking falsely but doing so unintentionally.

You offered an accusation.

If you wanted to do so, then fine - have at it. I don't think it's helpful, and we're all on the same side here, so ought to be a little more generous with each other than to just assume the worst possible intentions of someone.

One instance is not "routinely", but perhaps you might identify the case in question. If you are talking about persons being court-martialed after service for acts committed during active service, that is not the same thing.

I actually did research into the question, which is why I pointed out to you that the US District Court for DC considers it unconstitutional.

You want Trump to have had the power to lock up Air Force Reserve Command Colonel Ted Lieu. I get it. It's not happening.

Let’s not assume we know what the other person is thinking nor put words in the other person’s mouth.

How about we dial it back a notch or 10 for the sake of civility?

And court martialled. I wouldn't say it's routine, but it has happened. Army and Navy have both done it, and I think Air Force as well.

Saw some ridiculous railroading of enlisted personnel. I used to exercise a bit of judgment of my own when it came to implementing a reduction in pay although I could do nothing about reductions in rank, etc.

One time there was a big discussion and conundrum over how much bread and water to give a jailed private.

I digress.

Any guesses on the statute of limitations for those who have served? That is, if one even exists.

Flynn should be in Leavenworth at this point. His initial offense was operating as a foreign agent while under consideration for and then while serving as the President’s National Security Advisor I believe. He went on to become one of the seditious conspiracy principles trying overturn the 2020 presidential election. He’s committed other crimes as well.

Seeing a former lieutenant general in the army behave like this and spout all the crazy shit he’s constantly spouting and seeing him clearly be one of the primary conspiracists—and seeing the Army do fuck all about it constantly amazes me.

He should be recalled to active duty and court martialed as you say.

Thanks for writing that letter.

Kudos.

to the code of ethics, his court martial is overdue. I doubt his pardon encompasses all his evils. And why is his brother walking around?

Right up there with ol’ Benny-baby.

And as I recall, Benedict Arnold started out as a greatly-admired good guy.

Wish more would do the same. Appreciate the effort.

[link:https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/02/22/supreme-court-retirees-can-be-court-martialed-crimes-committed-after-service.html|

]https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/29/military-retirees-can-be-court-martialed-after-all-appeals-court-decides.html

My son is serving on a carrier. Seems like every 15 minutes I’m checking headlines.

To see this traitor scum walking free and tearing the fabric of our country fills me with a revulsion I really can’t describe in words.

You are asking the US military to intervene in civilian criminal justice. Can you imagine future military leaders (like General Flynn) arbitrarily deciding to impose military tribunals on civilians they didn't like?.

Link: https://www.military.com/daily-news/2019/02/22/supreme-court-retirees-can-be-court-martialed-crimes-committed-after-service.html

!!!

The OP stated something like "the military routinely recalls retired personnel to active duty for court-martial."

Some responses were a bit in-your-face, accusing him of lying or of not knowing what he is talking about;

I served 28 years in the Army. I retired short of 30 because wounds from Vietnam caught up with me and I could not do what my position required. Two tours in the bush in Vietnam with the medals, scars, and bad dreams to prove it.

The OP was not correct in stating "routinely." In fact, the recall to active duty for court-martial is rarely used. Whether he lied, was mistaken, did not check his sources carefully, or simply embellished is for only him to know.

I suggest he post a follow-up, correct his statement, apologize to anyone who was offended.

As for those who called him a liar . . . well . . .

Meanwhile, I'm going to make a mid-afternoon Bloody Mary, watch some Winter Olympics and some YouTube cute kitten videos.

FYI: I wrote to the Chief of Staff of the Army and to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking the same thing -- that Flynn be recalled and court-martialed. Not gonna happen. HOWEVER -- if the Jan 6 Committee or DOJ charges him with something, DoD may decide to get involved. Meanwhile, we will just have to live with the ingorant sonofabitch.

unbelievable as well.


I also was in the military, years ago, but even if I hadn’t been - that part strains credulity.

My ex's first sergeant got involved when he neglected to pick up his young daughter for weekend visitation. The military hierarchy DOES get involved in the civilian lives of present and past military recruits.

Plus, OP said the NCO was “court-martialed.”

I was in the USAF, and there are punishments for minor offenses that never go to court-martial. I remember a friend getting an Article 15 for some minor offense.

I never said the military didn’t get involved in private lives; as a gay woman, I’m well aware they did, and no doubt still do.

Look up Army Major General James Grazioplene. He's now a Second Lieutenant. If you haven't heard of him, have a Bloody Mary and get a hot shower ready before you read his tales.

I can't stomach what Gen Flynn has done. To me, he is a traitor to his country. He has, whether knowingly or not, given aid and comfort to an enemy of this country (Russia), even tho we are not actively in a hot-war type situation. I still consider us to be in a cold war, and tipping towards an active war, what with all the cyberattacks, etc. And I'd still like to see what an unbiased investigation into the election of 2016 would look like. I thought it strange when Trump, upon winning in 2016, immediately turned around and declared his candidacy for 2020. We figured it was for the money. But who knows what other doors it opened for him, as far as planning for a treasonous hit and run at an autocratic "presidency."

I deleted that entry immediately.

Sorry for not being up to speed here.

why can't he be recalled and disciplined?

gave you a heart for this!

Our government is about how things look not how they should be.

It does not look good to strip a general of his rank etc.
Not a single person saw prison in the 2008 financial meltdown, but we still gave the banks a huge bailout and they are back bigger and fatter then ever.
What Nixon did was not that bad...
Trump didn't kill that many people or break that many laws...

You get the point...Laws and stuff are for the little people

I wholeheartedly agree with EVERYTHING you've just posted.