3 football hs players lure teammate outside and beat him very badly
..and thought they would not be prosectuted?? didn't hide their identity. ?? texted about. did it in public, was filmed. then walked away as if there would be no consequences? they beat him half to death.3 Texas teens arrested over alleged beating that put classmate in ICU
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/3-texas-teens-arrested-over-alleged-beating-that-put-classmate-in-icu/ar-AARIyX9
Police responded to an assault call around 11:30 p.m. about an unconscious 16-year-old who was bleeding from his ears. When they arrived at the scene, they found the victim, who had been badly beaten, and transported him to a hospital.
According to investigators, two of the victim’s friends lured him outside a home saying that his truck had been damaged. When he was outside, one other person attacked him.
Reid Mitchell, 17, Logan Huber, 17 and Ayden Holland, 18, were arrested and charged with aggravated assault. They were released on a $20,000 bond.
Hagan is a junior at Brazoswood High School. The four teens are reportedly teammates on the school’s football team.
“They left him in the road after they finished attacking him and then texted one of his friends that were in the backyard of this house to say, ‘Hey come get your boy out of the street,’” Cole’s brother Cory Hagan told the local ABC affiliate, KTRK-TV. “They left him in the street, people who were supposed to be his friends.”
--------------
https://lawandcrime.com/crime/friends-allegedly-lured-high-school-football-player-into-ambush-that-fractured-his-skull/
‘Friends’ Allegedly Lured High School Football Player into Ambush That Fractured His Skull
Two teenagers (who authorities did not name in this document) lured Cole from a party on Friday in Lake Jackson, Texas, according to court documents obtained by KTRK. Mitchell then punched Cole Hagan in the face, slammed him to the concrete ground, and elbowed him hard three or four times, a witness said in this account.
There was hostility regarding “the victim’s perceived behavior to some of their female acquaintances,” authorities said.
-----------
Cole, a junior and wide receiver at Brazoswood High School, was put in the intensive care unit. He was able to breathe on his own after having to be sedated and on a ventilator, family said. He took a few steps on Monday, Cory said. The older brother spoke warmly of Cole.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Geezus.
him a little brain injury? but not one that bleeds and all that?
What if the female wanted to make an ex jealous?
What if the 3 guys were just jealous of the victim’s good looks and wanted to mess his face up?
There are so many scenarios that we could demand evidence for, aren’t there.
But a 3 on 1 sucker punch beat down over a supposed girlfriend isn’t an excuse to beat someone to near death. JFC, 
found it offensive, which you know and are trying to deflect from.
No one needs to reread your posts since they’ve already responded to them. It’s you who wants to deflect.
But I’m laughing you won’t or can’t own up to your “if” which you quoted again. It’s obvious my “ifs” were juxtapositions to your saying a half-dead teenager doesn’t need sympathy “if” they harassed someone.
I notice you don’t copy your posts about asking for “proof” of the murder intent—-which is also what my post was about. So you are the confused one.
Oh, and I also check profiles as you implied you did…Welcome! 😀 
were confusing, which they weren''t because you are now calling them "nothing at all." LOL.
But at least we see that it was you causing the confusion, most likely to deflect from the victim blaming.
You: What if the victim was a sexual harasser.
own original statements, which you now claim are "nothing at all" since they were your statements. LOL.
So obviously no one found them confusing.
You haven't provided any proof that the victim was a sexual harasser -- so now sexual harassers are "nothing at all"? But you do like your familiar sidebars.
but you have no evidence of the 16-year-old high school student beating victim being a sexual harasser.
Instead, you've insinuated confusion and then tried another sidebar of saying your posts were "nothing at all." You are obviously invested in the sidebars, though.
but others. Your posts are not confusing, so it's just wasting time to pretend that they are. I don't have to participate in your sidebars, but I do notice them.
You should just quite wasting time trying to deflect.
I've already acknowledged that you are repeating what you originally stated. What you need to do is quit trying to pretend that there is confusion when your comments about a 16-year-old beating victim were odd, strange, and sad. You can check my posts for that comment probably 10 posts ago. But you do like your sidebars...
You've taken us on a tangent and are complaining about that tangent. You repeat the same point over and over, yet ignore the post that addresses that point. You mischaracterize my words either out of confusion or malice (I give you the benefit of the doubt that it's confusion), but it's a mischaracterization nonetheless.
I've expressed my sympathy for the victim in this case over and over and over, yet you pretend that I've disparaged him.
At no point in any post have I accused the victim in this case of anything at all. There's a reason you've refused to respond to that post and there's a reason I keep pointing that out.
For anyone still keeping up, Nix wrote:
You: What if the victim is a sexual harasser?
I replied:
The person I responded to stated that in their opinion this was a case of attempted murder.
I never stated an opinion about this case. I have maintained my sympathy for the victim at every opportunity.
If I had stated that in my opinion, the victim had committed sexual harassment, I would expect other posters to challenge me to provide evidence of such a claim.
See how that works?
Still waiting for a response.
with me must be about something else.
You were not confusing, but you keep trying to push that angle. Hmm. I’ve acknowledged you said you stand by your original comments.
Your comments about the beating victim were “what if” but you feign confusion at others “what if” comments. This really isn’t such a dramatic observation.
That's what we're supposed to do, right? LOL!
For anyone still keeping up, Nix wrote:
You: What if the victim is a sexual harasser?
I replied:
The person I responded to stated that in their opinion this was a case of attempted murder.
I never stated an opinion about this case. I have maintained my sympathy for the victim at every opportunity.
If I had stated that in my opinion, the victim had committed sexual harassment, I would expect other posters to challenge me to provide evidence of such a claim.
See how that works?
Still waiting for a response.
you indicated in other posts something about your amusement, so maybe that's why this continues. But your original posts were not confusing. Isn't it obvious that no one has proof?? It's a new case, so to ask for evidence of attempted murder when you have no proof of sexual harassment seems rather unnecessary.
Your post 7 stated clearly "if the victim turns out to be a sexual harasser"
Your post No. 7
"7. I wonder what the "perceived behavior" that was exhibited by the victim to certain females
will turn out to be. This story sounds horrific, but if the victim turns out to be a sexual harasser, my sympathy will evaporate."
You tried to deflect from your original comments and it hasn't been going well for you. But your posts are not confusing, just obviously deflections.
