Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(59,502 posts)
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:15 PM Nov 2021

Two more very unusual things about the Rittenhouse trial

Much has been written about the way the judge is antagonistic to virtually all defense attacks - one comment saying it is as if the judge is protecting a beloved grandchild. However, thinking about the trial, one thing I have NOT seen is anything to characterize or humanize the victims. Think of most murder trials, it is almost always the case that the victim's family or friends are there providing a visible measure of the pain of the loss of the one killed. Unless I missed something, I have seen nothing - at the trial or even in the media - on the victims as people. (Compare to the Aubrey or George Floyd case.)

Consider yesterday, Rittenhouse's mother was out speaking of how it was not in his character to seek trouble. (echoing his own definition of himself as a lifeguard and inflating his connections to EMT, fire and police). In addition, the right has of course amplified the very real violence of the reaction to the police actions against Blake.

Why are we only now getting the removal of the gun charge? The size of the assault weapon's barrel has been known long before any indictments were made. What they CLEARLY indicate is Wisconsin has ridiculous gun laws. Was that charge there to try to reassure people that Rittenhouse would be found guilty on something? Does its removal by the biased judge at this point mean that they think he will be acquitted on all counts.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Girard442

(6,070 posts)
1. Conviction on the weapons charge was a near certainty.
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:27 PM
Nov 2021

The judge is clearly angling for a clean sweep.

MichMan

(11,912 posts)
17. Yet it appears that he wasn't in violation of any gun laws
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 05:11 PM
Nov 2021

A conviction wouldn't be appropriate under that circumstance

karynnj

(59,502 posts)
8. That might be a good question for the lawyers here
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:58 PM
Nov 2021

As a layman, I don't know if there any any checks or balance on a rogue judge. Further, have his actions risen to the level to be seen as a rogue judge. He certainly looks biased to me, but the question is whether their are rules or customs that he has violated.

Bev54

(10,048 posts)
13. I so hope that he is found guilty of murder and because of the judge's
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:09 PM
Nov 2021

obvious bias in Rittenhouse's favour, there is no room for appeal.

Ray Bruns

(4,093 posts)
3. "Consider yesterday, Rittenhouse's mother was out speaking of how it was not in his character
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:48 PM
Nov 2021

to seek trouble".

Wait. What.

She drove him to a town he did not live in with an AR-15.

How is that not "seeking trouble"?

rockfordfile

(8,702 posts)
5. A couple of those things have been debunked
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:57 PM
Nov 2021

It's said he drove himself which makes it even worse. A gun was given to the loser by another loser. He made the choice at 17 to shoot three people with a gun. This kid said something like "it was cool' to why he had a AR-15. That way of thinking and some loser puts a gun in his hands.

Walleye

(31,015 posts)
4. Rittenhouse never expressed any sorrow or regret to the deceased's relative
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 01:56 PM
Nov 2021

At least not that I heard. Someone who is forced to kill someone they don’t want to is usually devastated by their own action. Doesn’t seem to bother Kyle.

karynnj

(59,502 posts)
10. True - and his breakdown on the stand seemed contorted
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:02 PM
Nov 2021

In fact, if his lawyers had scripted that - I would imagine he would have said that the entire thing was a nightmare and the deaths are something he will live with his entire life and that he has had difficulty with that. As it was, it came out like a very spoiled kid unhappy that his view of himself was at odds with the things he did that he was having to answer for.

Walleye

(31,015 posts)
12. I began to think it was advice of lawyers
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:07 PM
Nov 2021

Some people, the right wing particularly, think that apologizing is admitting you did wrong. And they will never admit that

rockfordfile

(8,702 posts)
9. I don't know about any of the others things in your post but
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:02 PM
Nov 2021

"Consider yesterday, Rittenhouse's mother was out speaking of how it was not in his character to seek trouble" His mother is a pos just like him. He went to I guess a bar, and partied with right-wing domestic terrorist "proud boys". His mother goes on a un-American pos network. It proves a lot of things about those people.

Sympthsical

(9,073 posts)
14. The prosecution doesn't want the character of the victims to be introduced
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:09 PM
Nov 2021

Why? They have things in their pasts that would affect the jury's view of them. Heavy note - this does not mean they deserved to die.

But this is particularly at issue with Rosenbaum. He spent ten years in prison for raping children. He was released from a mental facility the day before because of a suicide attempt. In my opinion, he wasn't mentally stable that night given the video and testimony we've seen of his behavior.

Because Rosenbaum's death is the key, the prosecution didn't want to go near it. If Rosenbaum is self-defense, then the other two men can be self-defense. If the prosecution admits evidence and testimony of his good qualities, then the defense can go to absolute town on his bad ones.

You'd have the jury sitting there going, "Rittenhouse killed a child rapist." If you want a guilty verdict, would you introduce that?

To your second point. Honestly, given the way the gun laws are written, the prosecution shouldn't have brought that particular charge. We're getting an argument about it now, because the defense made a motion about it.

karynnj

(59,502 posts)
16. Wow - I never heard that
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 03:03 PM
Nov 2021

It makes the prosecution's decision very understandable. The gun charge comment makes sense.

I_UndergroundPanther

(12,463 posts)
15. Rittenhouse is a psychopath
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 02:44 PM
Nov 2021

That's why during his"emotional outburst"had no tears to show for it.
He was faking that remorse. All psychopaths when caught want to elicit pity and convince others they deserve pity when they dont deserve it.

He needs to be locked up for the rest of his life.

MichMan

(11,912 posts)
18. Why was the prosecution charging him for a gun law violation?
Mon Nov 15, 2021, 05:13 PM
Nov 2021

Did they not understand the laws? Once the Judge ruled he wasn't allowing that charge, they didn't object at all.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Two more very unusual thi...