General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFOX News banned from Canada for lying during news cast
http://sayitaintsoalready.com/2011/03/02/fox-shut-out-of-canada-because-of-a-law-against-lying-during-newscasts/Little Star
(17,055 posts)wouldn't that be nice here?
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Ronald Reagan abolished the Fairness Doctrine in 1987.
DeathToTheOil
(1,124 posts)And I thought I had a problem with procrastination!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)in Nazi Germany. They have done much harm by brainwashing to American citizens.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)all they do is fucking lie to Americans, pitting Americans up against each other so the 1% can get away with crime.
Hulk
(6,699 posts)Be aware!....fox is hitting ALL of Latin America, and very possibly many other reaches of the world with their propaganda machine. It's FREE down here in Mexico now...and I'm hoping it vanishes off the cable channels, but I seriously doubt it. NO advertisements....24/7 propaganda, dosed with just a dash of "food, medicine, news, etc" to keep the viewers attached and believing fox is actually something besides a propaganda outlet.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada because Fox News U.S. and Global Television were planning to create Fox News Canada, a combination of U.S. and Canadian news. However in 2004, after a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.[77]
Fox News Channel is currently offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers, SaskTel, Shaw Cable, Shaw Direct and Telus TV. A notable exception is Vidéotron, Canada's third largest cable company, which has not added Fox News Channel to its lineup.
onenote
(42,693 posts)since Videotron is owned by Quebecor which owns Sun News which essentially is a competitor to Fox News.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Fox is apparently already on in Canada. They were approved back in 2004:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2004/11/18/fox_crtc041118.html
Sun-TV News is not Murdoch affiliated. Apparently it is owned by Quebecor Media:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_TV_News
The confusion seems to be that some people were referring to Sun colloquially as 'Fox News North'
A look at Fox's wikipedia page says they are on most cable outlets in Canada:
'In 2003, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) rejected a Canadian Cable Telecommunications Association (CCTA) application to bring Fox News to Canada because Fox News U.S. and Global Television were planning to create Fox News Canada, a combination of U.S. and Canadian news. However in 2004, after a Fox U.S. executive said there were no plans to create the combined channel, the CRTC approved an application to bring Fox News to Canada.
Fox News Channel is currently offered by Access Communications, Bell TV, Cogeco, Eastlink, Manitoba Telecom Services, Rogers, SaskTel, Shaw Cable, Shaw Direct and Telus TV. A notable exception is Vidéotron, Canada's third largest cable company, which has not added Fox News Channel to its lineup.'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_News_Channel
DeathToTheOil
(1,124 posts)is to a story from March 2 of last year.
onenote
(42,693 posts)MilesColtrane
(18,678 posts)This is just one more reason we need unrec.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)A: Why, all of them!
lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)Spazito
(50,282 posts)if we pay extra for it. I suspect the number of Canadians doing that is relatively small.
What was upheld is the regulation that prohibits the dissemination of false or misleading news. It did stop, however, any of Canada's broadcast/cable media from going the way of Fox which is great!
The CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission), under a Harper-appointed hack, was trying to change the regulation to:
"...apply only in cases when broadcasters know the information they are sharing is untrue and when it endangers or is likely to endanger the lives, health or safety of the public.
Because they must hold public hearings on these kinds of changes, Canadians had the chance to 'speak' in opposition to the proposed change and did so overwhelmingly.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/crtc-ditches-bid-to-allow-fake-news/article1921489/
iverglas
(38,549 posts)I'd been about to go running off to check the on-screen program guide to see whether I should be jumping for joy!
We had FoxNews during its initial free preview -- which was supposed to be two months and somehow dragged on for months and months. I always wondered whether they actually got approval for that. I guess they finally managed to sign up enough people for the cable companies to afford it. Although I wouldn't be surprised if FoxNews pays the distributors to carry it.
Have you watched SunTV at all? Worse than one would expect from the source of the Sun papers even. No page 3 "girl", though. Their website is dreadful.
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/
I think I watched 10 minutes of Ezra Levant once. There's someone who should stick to not trying to talk extemporaneously. I went and researched, on line, the story he was talking about: a lesbian couple insulted and assaulted in a comedy club by a comic and bar employees. Oddly, it wasn't at all the way he had described it ...
>> SEE all videos
About Ezra Levant
Summarized as: right-wing provocateur.
Spazito
(50,282 posts)went looking for the news articles on my trusted news sites ie CBC, etc, and......nothing. I was VERY disappointed but realized in searching the key words "Fox banned in Canada" what this OP was actually about so thought I would add some clarity.
As to Sun News, nope, have never watched it, will never watch it and, in all honesty, I have no idea where it would be found on my cable and thank (fill in the blank) for that!
Just seeing the name Ezra Levant causes me to struggle to hold down my lunch. He was and continues to by a lying POS.
polly7
(20,582 posts)but when I subscribed to Shaw it automatically came with a bundle of networks I did want. The representative on the phone originally asked me if I would like Fox ........... I said are you kidding??", so, I didn't think I'd get it. Turns out ...... I do.
Spazito
(50,282 posts)fee for it over and above the usual tier choices I believe. It is found above tier 4, it seems to me.
iverglas
(38,549 posts)It is digital, and comes as a single pay channel or in one of the news packages. (There are also MSNBC, which we did pay for at one time - we had both MSNBC and FoxNews during Katrina; and Deutche Welle and I forget what other international news services, and I think we can also get Al-Jazeera now ... when finances get back on better footing here, which Harper isn't helping as my work is largely tied to Parliament, we may just go for it, along with the co-vivant's English soccer channel.) We do get BBC World News on either basic or next-tier cable. If you do and don't watch regularly, check out the Doha Debates, around noon on Sunday I think.
http://www.thedohadebates.com/
The local Fox channel on regular basic cable carries the Sunday morning FoxNews show and you might want to check that one out. I was watching it for a while and the co-vivant was scoffing, but he tried it and liked it. The host is one of the better interviewers on air, and actually requires that interviewees answer his questions occasionally. The guests may be Republican nomination candidates, but he doesn't always suck up to them.
If I were diligent, I'd watch news on TV5 more often, French and Belgian newscasts in French. Instead, I just watch Des Chiffres et des Nombres and try to beat the contestants at the math and word puzzles.
I'll have to look into it. I was led to believe it was bundled with the other channels I did want. I've never watched it and don't really mind that it's just there, but if I'm paying extra for it, I'm gonna be a little pissed off.
iverglas
(38,549 posts)Fox is just whatever local Fox network channel is available -- it carries shows like 24 and I forget what we're watching on there these days. I'm not sure whether it's basic cable or the next tier up. (We have digital and the full package up to individual pay channels, so we don't go for the Movie Network or HBO Canada or such, but we have time-shifting and a couple of the pays, like Mystery, for my late-night falling-asleep CI and SVU viewing.)
FoxNews is a whole nother thing from Fox.
But as I mentioned, our local Fox channel carries the FoxNews Sunday morning program -- I think that's the only FoxNews programming it carries.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)I'm with Telus and they bundle Fox News with CNN, MSNBC, CBCnews, CNBC, CTVnewsnet, AlJazeera etc. It's called simply the 'news' package. No Sun-whatever-they-call-it yet. My dad has it through Shaw, and it's bundled too. I saw it at his place once. It was truly awful, laughable even. Worse than Fox.
onenote
(42,693 posts)First, Sun News is not Fox. Its not owned or otherwise affiliated with News Corp. Its owned by Quebecor. It was dubbed "Fox News North" because it was believed (probably with good reason) that it wanted to create a Fox-style conservative news channel. But Fox wasn't shut out of Canada because Fox wasn't the one trying to get into Canada.
Second, Sun News was not "banned" from getting on the Canadian airwaves. Originally, it sought a type of license from the Canadian authorities that would have given it mandatory carriage rights on cable and satellite companies operating in Canada (just as certain other "basic" channels are given). The verdict from the Canadian authorities was that the channel wasn't unique enough to warrant that sort of categorization. So, ultimately, Sun News applied for and received a lower category license that allows it to broadcast but doesn't give it mandatory carriage rights. It launched in the Spring of 2011 and is being carried by some cable and satellite providers in Canada.
Of course there is more to the story. For example, there were reports that the Harper government had put pressure on the Canadian authorities to approve the original mandatory carriage license. There also were reprots that Quebecor officials were seen meeting with Roger Ailes. However, there seems to be no evidence that Fox ever had or planned to have an ownership or management stake in the network.
I'm not trying to defend Sun News, but there is no reason for DUers to be misled about this story.
Spazito
(50,282 posts)separate from the Sun News demands for special treatment re Category 1 placement and then Category 2 placement with additional protections.
The first demand was turned down, the second was withdrawn.
Neither CRTC decision was directly related to FNN itself.
Article re Sun News/CRTC:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/sun-tv-gears-down-licence-application/article1743859/
iverglas
(38,549 posts)Yes, the information at the blog really is largely false in the ways you describe.
It certainly galls me that the thing is available for "free" in standard and all other cable packages (as is that Christian one now). If anything ever qualified as a "specialty" channel ...
pintobean
(18,101 posts)The recs just keep coming. A lot of people don't bother to read through a thread before reccing or replying.
SlimJimmy
(3,180 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)I'd edit, then delete, the OP.
It's a hit and run.