Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:15 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

Ralph Nader lied about this wonderful car.

He rigged the test and destroyed a great car
&t=1033s

79 replies, 4082 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

79 replies	Author	Time	Post
Ralph Nader lied about this wonderful car. (Original post)	Casady1	Sep 2021	OP
Well, if so, it wasn't all that he lied about...	hlthe2b	Sep 2021	#1
Yes, he did, and ruined US automaker's innovations	MineralMan	Sep 2021	#2
My uncle also had one, and he loved it	obamanut2012	Sep 2021	#14
And had he not decided to run as a 3rd party candidate in 2000	Equomba	Sep 2021	#3
I used to like 3rd-partiers too. People who reject everything "mainstream"	Hortensis	Sep 2021	#11
well said.	dsp3000	Sep 2021	#47
Why do you assume that third-party voters would have voted Dem otherwise?	DickKessler	Sep 2021	#72
That assumes Nader voters would have voted Dem, or that the GOP wouldn't still steal the election.	DickKessler	Sep 2021	#71
Without Nader on the ballot, the recount would not have ocurred and	Equomba	Sep 2021	#74
And without the Florida GOP purge of Black voters and the butterfly ballots, Gore would have won FL.	DickKessler	Sep 2021	#75
I merely stated that had Nader not been on the ballot,	Equomba	Sep 2021	#78
I think Ralph Nader is a fraud on many levels...	Mazeltov Cocktail	Sep 2021	#4
Why do I care what a guy with $450 million has to say about a car?	Farmer-Rick	Sep 2021	#5
If he's "not in your world"....	BradAllison	Sep 2021	#16
Hehe, very funny	Farmer-Rick	Sep 2021	#49
Jay Leno earned his money honestly. I don't begrudge that kind of wealth.	hunter	Sep 2021	#59
As multi-millionaires go he's not the worse	Farmer-Rick	Sep 2021	#62
I can recall the exact moment I rejected life as a potential multi-millionaire.	hunter	Sep 2021	#69
But can you remember when you decided not to abuse others?	Farmer-Rick	Sep 2021	#73
LOL	Xoan	Sep 2021	#22
The poster's referring to Jay Leno	Sympthsical	Sep 2021	#31
The Corsa, contained a crapload of "Fixes"....	bobalew	Sep 2021	#6
That is actually untrue	Casady1	Sep 2021	#10
Come to San Martin, Ca. and test drive some of them.. Then express your opinion...	bobalew	Sep 2021	#20
and so was I.	Casady1	Sep 2021	#28
Our first new car	snowybirdie	Sep 2021	#7
I loved my Corvair. I thought it was a great car.	SharonAnn	Sep 2021	#8
My 1st car, I had 2 ... Nader didn't kill them	dweller	Sep 2021	#9
Early Porsche 911s were also legendary for their tendency to swap ends if one drove too hot into	sop	Sep 2021	#12
the early Porshe's (365)	Casady1	Sep 2021	#13
Mid and Rear Engine Cars Are Tank Slappers...	ruet	Sep 2021	#53
Nope, GM botched their response to the book	UnderThisLaw	Sep 2021	#15
Yep. It's amazing what people apparently defend now that Nader hurt their fee fees.	Hassin Bin Sober	Sep 2021	#19
It's all because of 2000.	DickKessler	Sep 2021	#76
Yet they video you post says the Mustang killed the Corvair	Hassin Bin Sober	Sep 2021	#17
Leno's opinion	Casady1	Sep 2021	#18
What about the other chapters of that book? Did they hate America?	Hassin Bin Sober	Sep 2021	#21
I was 14 when that book came out	Casady1	Sep 2021	#34
That's interesting	UnderThisLaw	Sep 2021	#40
You should have seen the press at the time	Casady1	Sep 2021	#43
I kind of think	UnderThisLaw	Sep 2021	#44
If I could have a vintage car, it would be a white top convertible turquoise Covair	LakeArenal	Sep 2021	#23
It is one of the better values	Casady1	Sep 2021	#25
This.	LakeArenal	Sep 2021	#27
you would want	Casady1	Sep 2021	#29
Thanks. My dream gets more detailed❣️	LakeArenal	Sep 2021	#30
That is a beauty	Casady1	Sep 2021	#32
I own one of these	Casady1	Sep 2021	#36
Sigh. That's very cool.	LakeArenal	Sep 2021	#54
The first modern car	Casady1	Sep 2021	#55
Nader was a complete asshat. Self-aggrandizing egomaniacal weasel.	Maru Kitteh	Sep 2021	#24
Ralph is living proof only the good die young.	BannonsLiver	Sep 2021	#26
Yeah, like Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter	progressoid	Sep 2021	#45
Exceptions that prove the rule.	BannonsLiver	Sep 2021	#46
It's not whataboutism	progressoid	Sep 2021	#50
Learned to drive in a Corvair Monza. Great little care back when most cars were huge.	Hoyt	Sep 2021	#33
That's my memory of the Volkswagens my dad always bought.	hunter	Sep 2021	#42
I had a covair spyder....loved it	spanone	Sep 2021	#35
Modern cars were developed in the 1980's.	hunter	Sep 2021	#37
The first truly modern car	Casady1	Sep 2021	#41
One of my brothers had a 510.	hunter	Sep 2021	#51
we used to have a saying	Casady1	Sep 2021	#52
It makes me sad when you call the 60's the "bad old days". That's the era when I started to	napi21	Sep 2021	#48
They were developed before the 1980s in Europe and Japan	Klaralven	Sep 2021	#65
"The last US automotive innovation seems to have been the Bendix electric starter...."	mahatmakanejeeves	Sep 2021	#67
Most of those things were in limited production as options on a few models.	Klaralven	Sep 2021	#68
Always heard that Nader never had a driver's license in his entire life	MichMan	Sep 2021	#38
Personally, I'm more	UnderThisLaw	Sep 2021	#39
Harvard trained attorney who got his info from hundreds of filed cases against the auto mfrs.	Hassin Bin Sober	Sep 2021	#58
The original Corvairs did have an oversteer problem which could lead to upsets on turns.	yellowcanine	Sep 2021	#56
swing axles were on Porches and VW's	Casady1	Sep 2021	#57
I had a major 'no steer' problem driving a Corvair. The car was so back end heavy, that ...	Brother Mythos	Sep 2021	#77
The video states the Ralph Nader cause the car to be produced for more years.	cinematicdiversions	Sep 2021	#60
And says nothing about rigging some test. No evidence provided for claims made.	Celerity	Sep 2021	#61
this probably explains it	Casady1	Sep 2021	#64
Covairs were some of the flimsiest, shittiest cars ever built	Champp	Sep 2021	#63
The car that Nader called "unsafe at any speed" wasn't the Corvair. It was	mahatmakanejeeves	Sep 2021	#66
What's the point of this thread?	DickKessler	Sep 2021	#70
Which is dumber, the 66 Corvair thread or the Dogs Are Too Expensive thread?	Bucky	Sep 2021	#79

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:19 PM

hlthe2b (95,522 posts)

1. Well, if so, it wasn't all that he lied about...

How different all would be if he'd not intervened in so many things. No, I'm not willing to rehash the 2000 election, but...

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:23 PM

MineralMan (144,945 posts)

2. Yes, he did, and ruined US automaker's innovations

from then on. Chevrolet introduced the Corvair as a new concept in American automobiles. Even though rear engine, air-cooled engine cars already existed, GM took a big chance by introducing the Corvair.

I owned a 1960 Corvair - the first year it became available. It wasn't unsafe. Driven normally, it was as safe as any other automobile, and safer than some rear-engine cars. GM improved it, year after year, and by the time Nader's book came out, what he complained about had already been redesigned to correct high-speed cornering instability. For most drivers, that flaw would never have even been detected or experienced.

But, GM fixed it and improved the car's handling dramatically by 1964. Sadly, Nader's book killed one of the most innovative car designs in GM history, and also scared off other manufacturers from innovating in their designs, as well.

Later, Nader went on to help defeat Al Gore in 2000, giving us George W. Bush to mislead the country.

No thanks, Ralph. You've done enough already to spoil things.

Reply to this post

Response to MineralMan (Reply #2)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:51 PM

obamanut2012 (23,706 posts)

14. My uncle also had one, and he loved it

And drove it for many years without any major issues. People laughed at him about owning one, and he said what you just did: Nader killed the US auto market for decades.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:24 PM

Equomba (197 posts)

3. And had he not decided to run as a 3rd party candidate in 2000

we would be living in a completely different world today.

Probably no 9/11, Iraq, Afghanistan, or tRump, to name a few.

I have nothing against 3rd party candidates, but there can be consequences.

Reply to this post

Response to Equomba (Reply #3)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:41 PM

Hortensis (55,059 posts)

11. I used to like 3rd-partiers too. People who reject everything "mainstream"

or establishment needed alternatives. It's nice for those drawn to zealots, spiritualists, or scammers to have choices. I used to drive them, among others, to the polls when I believed everyone should vote. I was young.

Unfortunately, it turned out that most third-partiers and candidates despise Democrats specifically so much they think they're doing good, or at very least doing no real harm, by throwing elections to the Republicans. And whatever's wrong with them makes them try again general election after general election.

And as you say.

Reply to this post

Response to Hortensis (Reply #11)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:20 PM

dsp3000 (426 posts)

47. well said.

Reply to this post

Response to Hortensis (Reply #11)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:51 PM

DickKessler (260 posts)

72. Why do you assume that third-party voters would have voted Dem otherwise?

You could just as easily say they wouldn't have voted at all.

Reply to this post

Response to Equomba (Reply #3)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:50 PM

DickKessler (260 posts)

71. That assumes Nader voters would have voted Dem, or that the GOP wouldn't still steal the election.

Nader wasn't the reason that Gore "lost." The election was stolen by Republicans.

Do you blame Pat Buchanan for running third party?

Reply to this post

Response to DickKessler (Reply #71)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 12:32 PM

Equomba (197 posts)

74. Without Nader on the ballot, the recount would not have ocurred and

there would have been no Supreme Court involvement.

One exit poll asked respondents how they would vote in a two-person race between Bush and Gore. 47% of the Nader voters said they would choose Gore in a two-man race, 21% would choose Bush, and 32% would not vote. Applying these figures to the actual vote, Gore would have achieved a net gain of 26,000 votes in Florida, far more than needed to carry the state easily.

Reply to this post

Response to Equomba (Reply #74)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 02:43 PM

DickKessler (260 posts)

75. And without the Florida GOP purge of Black voters and the butterfly ballots, Gore would have won FL.

Don't blame this all on Nader. There were many factors.

Reply to this post

Response to DickKessler (Reply #75)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 08:38 PM

Equomba (197 posts)

78. I merely stated that had Nader not been on the ballot,

Gore would have won, which you appear to agree with.

I didn't blame him for anything, he was the focus of the OP and I made a comment about him. Had the OP been about butterfly ballots I might have made the observation that THEY cost Gore the election. Each can stand on their own... combining them makes the eventual outcome even more lamentable.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:26 PM

Mazeltov Cocktail (569 posts)

4. I think Ralph Nader is a fraud on many levels...

But why did GM allow him to slander one of their cars like this?
My Dad had a '63 2-door with 4 on the floor. He worked for GM, and he thought that Nader had been bought and paid for.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:28 PM

Farmer-Rick (8,078 posts)

5. Why do I care what a guy with $450 million has to say about a car?

He doesn't live in the real world. His interest are Not equivalent to my interests. He has no way of understanding my concerns and my life. He may have come from average stock, I don't know or care. Right now his excessive wealth makes him someone not in my world.

Reply to this post

Response to Farmer-Rick (Reply #5)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:56 PM

BradAllison (1,873 posts)

16. If he's "not in your world"....

...how do you know his worth?

Reply to this post

Response to BradAllison (Reply #16)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:27 PM

Farmer-Rick (8,078 posts)

49. Hehe, very funny

He Ives in the world of the super rich. I live in the world of the lucky to get by.

Here's a link from my world:

As of 2021, Jay Leno’s net worth is roughly $450 million.

James Douglas Muir Leno is an American actor, comedian and television host from New York. He initially gained recognition when he had his debut on The Tonight Show in 1977, where he performed a comedy routine.

https://wealthygorilla.com/jay-leno-net-worth/

Reply to this post

Response to Farmer-Rick (Reply #49)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 10:38 PM

hunter (36,428 posts)

59. Jay Leno earned his money honestly. I don't begrudge that kind of wealth.

On the other hand, there's quite a few sociopath defense contractors, health insurance executives, slum lords, televangelists, etc., who should probably be in prison, not flying around in private jets. Society has to protect itself from people like that.

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #59)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:45 AM

Farmer-Rick (8,078 posts)

62. As multi-millionaires go he's not the worse

Some people think that if you become successful in an inherently evil system it is fine. Taking advantage of the built in abuses of the system to get ahead is not abusive itself.

But others think that you are part of the problem if you get excessively successful off an abusive system. All those slave owners who got so vastly wealthy off of using the abusive economic system they did not create were part of the problem. All those Lord's and Kings who allowed their serfs to live on the edge of starvation were part of the problem even if they didn't actively murder their citizens. Owning stocks in a corporation that is killing the planet is part of the problem.

What would happen if no one bought stocks? I bet the slave owner Or the Lord couldn't imagine a world without a slave economy or feudal system too. Yeah, capitalism is an improvement over slavery and feudalism but it is still a very abusive system for most people. And getting excessively wealthy and powerful off it is not a virtue.

Reply to this post

Response to Farmer-Rick (Reply #62)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:45 PM

hunter (36,428 posts)

69. I can recall the exact moment I rejected life as a potential multi-millionaire.

It was one of the better decisions I've made in my life.

If I hadn't quit high school for college I'd probably be dead.

If I hadn't rejected my one opportunity to be a multi-millionaire I wouldn't have a soul.

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #69)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 09:43 AM

Farmer-Rick (8,078 posts)

73. But can you remember when you decided not to abuse others?

Can you remember when you decided that hurting others for your own success was Not something you could live with?

I remember hurting a friend to get promoted and decided that I would never do it again because I lost a valuable friend over it.

Then I started questioning how our economic system promotes abuse and success at any cost. The cost of other's feelings, the cost of destroying the environment are hidden in the costs of capitalism.

You know, if you promote a philosophy that justifies the filthy rich you have the potential of making a lot of money. The filthy rich are always looking for a mouthpiece to promote their corruption. But you chose Not to do that either.

You did make the decision, you just didn't realize it.

Reply to this post

Response to Farmer-Rick (Reply #5)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:28 PM

Xoan (25,112 posts)

22. LOL

Net Worth in 2021: $8 million
Last Updated: September 2021

https://www.wealthypersons.com/ralph-nader-net-worth-2020-2021/

Reply to this post

Response to Xoan (Reply #22)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:42 PM

Sympthsical (6,063 posts)

31. The poster's referring to Jay Leno

It's Leno's YouTube thingy in the OP.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:29 PM

bobalew (317 posts)

6. The Corsa, contained a crapload of "Fixes"....

Previous Models, however, were literal deathtraps. From someone who drove a few of these, I can completely concur with Ralph Nader on the subject. Let's not revise history without experience, or facts. I have available, to this day, many examples of these, due to a friend who collects them. He has over 50 of them to date, in his inventory. The earlier models all drive like unruly boxmobiles, due to poorly designed suspensions, & steering geometry.

Reply to this post

Response to bobalew (Reply #6)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:38 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

10. That is actually untrue

Porsche and VW used the swing axle . The 1972 report by the NSA stated that the early Corvairs were as safe as any other car on the road. What people did was over inflate the tires. Front tires on Corvair only required 16 lbs of air pressure.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #10)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:23 PM

bobalew (317 posts)

20. Come to San Martin, Ca. and test drive some of them.. Then express your opinion...

Facts & proof is what I offer. Nothing less.. and 16 lbs of tire pressure was one of the Fixes. Normal tire pressure in that era was ~ 28-30 lbs/ Sq inch... as it might be now.. You see @ 68 yrs, I'm not only aware of history, I'm part of it.

Reply to this post

Response to bobalew (Reply #20)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:38 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

28. and so was I.

I'm 70. 16 lbs was not a fix. You fall into the 28-30 lbs. were normal group. This was a car that was out of the ordinary. By 1965 it was the first car that had full independent suspension.. The specific issue was addressed and the NSA eventually founf d that the Corvair was no more dangerous than any other car from that era. People over inflated the tires. Look it up. Swing axles were normal at the time and many European cars had it.

https://www.nytimes.com/1972/07/21/archives/us-car-study-disputes-nader-on-corvair-safety-charge-in-65-us-car.html

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:31 PM

snowybirdie (4,404 posts)

7. Our first new car

Lovely, shiny. Hubby went through a side street intersection near our house. He got clipped in the rear fender. Rolled five times and ended up parked in front of our house, right side up. Nuff said! Unsafe and dangerous!

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:33 PM

SharonAnn (13,501 posts)

8. I loved my Corvair. I thought it was a great car.

It was easy to drive, economical, and could go just about anywhere in snow.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:36 PM

dweller (21,929 posts)

9. My 1st car, I had 2 ... Nader didn't kill them

I did …

😔

✌🏻

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:43 PM

sop (8,927 posts)

12. Early Porsche 911s were also legendary for their tendency to swap ends if one drove too hot into

a corner, but these days they're expensive, sought-after classics. Old VWs didn't handle that great either. Nader's always been an annoying gadfly.

Reply to this post

Response to sop (Reply #12)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:47 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

13. the early Porshe's (365)

used swing axles as did VW's . I had one of the last VW's9('68) that had a swing axle( my first car). Most people over inflted the tires on the front end which made them squirrely. They only required 16lbs of air pressure.

Reply to this post

Response to sop (Reply #12)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:44 PM

ruet (9,796 posts)

53. Mid and Rear Engine Cars Are Tank Slappers...

if you don't know what you're driving. ...a driver education issue.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:54 PM

UnderThisLaw (308 posts)

15. Nope, GM botched their response to the book

of which only one chapter was about the Corvair. It didn’t receive much attention until it became known that GM was searching for personal info on Nader. If their reaction had been “this guy isn’t a engineer and doesn’t know what he is talking about” much less publicity.

Reply to this post

Response to UnderThisLaw (Reply #15)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:22 PM

Hassin Bin Sober (25,413 posts)

19. Yep. It's amazing what people apparently defend now that Nader hurt their fee fees.

He was ahead of his time calling out the ridiculous way the big 3 would refuse to spend a few bucks on simple safety features but would spend hundreds a year on styling.

Like you said. One chapter in the book. And the rest about they way we now know the way the way the manufacturers acted.

Who can forget the Pinto. But now Nader is the bad guy but not the people who were ok with customers burning to death. Good lord.

Sometimes I feel like I wandered on the old yahoo comments section.

But at least Nader detractors are in good company.

In 2005, the book received an honorable mention by conservative publication Human Events for its "Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries", meaning two or more out of fifteen conservative thinkers voted for it. Other award winners included authors Betty Friedan and John Maynard Keynes

Industry response[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsafe_at_Any_Speed

In response to Nader's criticisms, GM attempted to sabotage Nader's reputation. It "conducted a series of interviews with acquaintances of the plaintiff, 'questioning them about, and casting aspersions upon [his] political, social, racial and religious views; his integrity; his sexual proclivities and inclinations; and his personal habits'; (2) kept him under surveillance in public places for an unreasonable length of time; (3) caused him to be accosted by girls for the purpose of entrapping him into illicit relationships; (4) made threatening, harassing and obnoxious telephone calls to him; (5) tapped his telephone and eavesdropped, by means of mechanical and electronic equipment, on his private conversations with others; and (6) conducted a 'continuing' and harassing investigation of him."[12]
On March 22, 1966, GM President James Roche was forced to appear before a United States Senate subcommittee and apologized to Nader for the company's campaign of harassment and intimidation. Nader sued GM in November 1966 for invasion of privacy.[12][10] He won the case on appeal in January 1970 and was awarded $425,000, which he used to establish the Center for Auto Safety, a non-profit advocacy group. He went on to lobby for consumer rights, helping drive the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the passage of the Clean Air Act, among others.[13]
Former GM executive and Chevrolet's general manager John DeLorean asserted in the book On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors (1979) that he believed Nader's criticisms were valid in the context of the rigidity and short-sightedness of General Motors' corporate culture.[14][15]

Reply to this post

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #19)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 02:45 PM

DickKessler (260 posts)

76. It's all because of 2000.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:57 PM

Hassin Bin Sober (25,413 posts)

17. Yet they video you post says the Mustang killed the Corvair

Rear engine car with 1960s technology suspensions? Yeah, no way that is going to be safe in a highway speed over-correction in an accident avoidance. Front engine cars were bad enough.

Cars, until recently, haven’t had electronic stability control as a required safety feature. Estimates, last I looked, we’re the ESC might save 4,000 lives a year in oversteer accidents. Whipping that heavy back end around in an emergency would be curtains for the occupants.

My neighbor had two Corvair convertibles. Cool cars.

Reply to this post

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #17)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 12:59 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

18. Leno's opinion

But it never really recovered. I was alive at the time. How many buyers were turned off by Nader? I think plenty.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #18)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:24 PM

Hassin Bin Sober (25,413 posts)

21. What about the other chapters of that book? Did they hate America?

Reply to this post

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #21)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:48 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

34. I was 14 when that book came out

and ralph was on TV all the time about it. It was everywhere and the Corvair never recovered.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #34)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:40 PM

UnderThisLaw (308 posts)

40. That's interesting

because this guy seems to think the Corvair lingered because of Nader.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/classic-cars/a13733502/yes-the-chevrolet-corvair-really-was-a-handful-to-drive/

Reply to this post

Response to UnderThisLaw (Reply #40)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:49 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

43. You should have seen the press at the time

no one wanted touch them after the report.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #43)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:01 PM

UnderThisLaw (308 posts)

44. I kind of think

that a GM engineer who prepared for the lawsuits might know what he was talking about.

And as mentioned before, GM pretty much caused their own issues

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:29 PM

LakeArenal (25,295 posts)

23. If I could have a vintage car, it would be a white top convertible turquoise Covair

With white leather seats. Sigh.

Reply to this post

Response to LakeArenal (Reply #23)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:31 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

25. It is one of the better values

for a classic car.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #25)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:35 PM

LakeArenal (25,295 posts)

27. This.

Reply to this post

Response to LakeArenal (Reply #27)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:40 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

29. you would want

the manual and turbo.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #29)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:41 PM

LakeArenal (25,295 posts)

30. Thanks. My dream gets more detailed❣️

Reply to this post

Response to LakeArenal (Reply #30)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:46 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

32. That is a beauty

such great lines and still looks modern.

Reply to this post

Response to LakeArenal (Reply #27)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:55 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

36. I own one of these

only it is a 1994.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/403155048157?hash=item5ddde9d6dd:g:l5AAAOSw3YdhPktq

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #36)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:47 PM

LakeArenal (25,295 posts)

54. Sigh. That's very cool.

Reply to this post

Response to LakeArenal (Reply #54)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:51 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

55. The first modern car

the first car with a coil per cylinder. 4 wheel drive, very stiff reinforced body and 258 lbs of torque stock. of course mine isn't stock.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:30 PM

Maru Kitteh (26,228 posts)

24. Nader was a complete asshat. Self-aggrandizing egomaniacal weasel.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:34 PM

BannonsLiver (14,684 posts)

26. Ralph is living proof only the good die young.

Reply to this post

Response to BannonsLiver (Reply #26)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:13 PM

progressoid (47,679 posts)

45. Yeah, like Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter

Reply to this post

Response to progressoid (Reply #45)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:18 PM

BannonsLiver (14,684 posts)

46. Exceptions that prove the rule.

But I do enjoy a good whataboutism.

Ralph, like all hypocritical scum bags, will not be remembered as fondly as those two will be, though. Believe that.

Reply to this post

Response to BannonsLiver (Reply #46)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:30 PM

progressoid (47,679 posts)

50. It's not whataboutism

Nor is it the exception that proves the rule, because an idiom is not a rule.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:48 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)

33. Learned to drive in a Corvair Monza. Great little care back when most cars were huge.

Only problem I remember is that burnt oil leaked into the cabin and smelled awful.

Reply to this post

Response to Hoyt (Reply #33)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:47 PM

hunter (36,428 posts)

42. That's my memory of the Volkswagens my dad always bought.

Cars with air cooled engines extracted cabin heat from the exhaust manifolds and engine compartment. If there were any oil leaks, even small ones, you'd smell it. The hot manifolds also burned whatever dust got on them. A cracked manifold or bad gasket could fill the car with carbon monoxide.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 01:51 PM

spanone (132,866 posts)

35. I had a covair spyder....loved it

got hit broadside in it. totaled the car. minor injuries.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:33 PM

hunter (36,428 posts)

37. Modern cars were developed in the 1980's.

Most cars before that were either deathtraps or steel boxes like the Volvo 200 series.

The Corvair wasn't especially dangerous and the handling wasn't especially worse than other cars of the time.

As young adults my brother and I briefly owned an old '67 Mustang that I much enjoyed driving. (We later fixed it up and sold it, doubling our money...)

Thirty years later, and accustomed to driving a 1980's Toyota, I drove a fully restored '67 Mustang and it wasn't as fun as I remembered. It was rough.

In the bad old days you had to know a cars flaw's, especially in hard driving, else it could kill you.

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #37)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:46 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

41. The first truly modern car

was the 1992 Audi S4. It was made between 92-94 and became the S6. It was the first car with coils on every cylinder. Before that you had one coil for all the cylinders. I have owned a couple of legendary cars. First one was a 1972 datsun 510. This is known as a calssic race car. Paul Newman raced them

the car I own today is a 1994 audi s4. This is truly a great driving car.

&t=234s

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Reply #41)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:34 PM

hunter (36,428 posts)

51. One of my brothers had a 510.

That was a nimble machine.

I have an extreme love/hate relationship with cars. When I was young and wild I drove all over California, the U.S. Southwest, and Northwestern Mexico. Gasoline was free and I could do most car repairs myself; with JB weld and fence wire if I had to. I've got a lot of nostalgic feelings about that. Jay Leno's garage is a secret vice.

On the other hand I'm a radical environmentalist who has seen too many people killed and maimed in car accidents.

In a perfect world most people would live in very pleasant walkable cities with excellent public transportation. Car ownership would be unnecessary. This planet simply can't support a car for every adult human, especially the roads, highways, energy, and materials that would require.

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #51)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:41 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

52. we used to have a saying

the 510 will beat a porsche downhill. They really handled. We can't work on cars anymore. In the old day we changed oil, did tuneups, set points and did everything. The Audi has a computer like today's cars so they are easy to analyze. My mechanic is great. I have the original clutch at 250K. the steering pump finally wore out( rubber went bad ) after 25 years. The Audi is so well built. There is one on ebay for $15,000. I can get $8,000 for mine. There are probably only 300-500 left.

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #37)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 03:26 PM

napi21 (45,758 posts)

48. It makes me sad when you call the 60's the "bad old days". That's the era when I started to

drive. I know there were some duds out there, but when I dream of yester-year I think of it as the era of fast cars with real style! People were proud of the car they drove, My favorites came along in the 70's with the Cuda, Camaro, GTO, and more. My absolute favorite was the Plymouth Superbird!!!! We almost bought a yellow one, but my husband chickened out & bought a Chrysler Newport (which I always called an old man's car & do to this day!).

Those were NOT the bad old days!

Reply to this post

Response to hunter (Reply #37)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 09:50 AM

Klaralven (7,510 posts)

65. They were developed before the 1980s in Europe and Japan

The three most important advances adopted in the US in the early '80s were radial tires and disc brakes from Europe and transverse front wheel drive trains from Japan (although Audi, Citroen, Renault and others had longitudinal front wheel drive before, the modern setup was perfected for mass production in Japan.)

The last US automotive innovation seems to have been the Bendix electric starter....

Reply to this post

Response to Klaralven (Reply #65)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 10:32 AM

mahatmakanejeeves (50,196 posts)

67. "The last US automotive innovation seems to have been the Bendix electric starter...."

The last US automotive innovation seems to have been the Bendix electric starter....

I disagree.

Oldsmobile introduced the automatic transmission in 1939, give or take.

Chrysler had disc brakes in 1953, again, give or take.

Lap seatbelts were optional on Fords in the mid-'50s.

Fuel injection was an option on the 1957 Chevrolet.

The 1963 Corvette had four-wheel independent suspension.

Disc brakes were optional on Fords by 1967 at least.

The three most important advances adopted in the US in the early '80s were radial tires and disc brakes from Europe ...

GM's A-body cars, starting in 1973, came from the factory with radial tires and front disc brakes.

Every Chrysler from 1973 on had electronic ignition.

Self-leveling suspensions were standard (or maybe an option) on some cars in the 1960s or 1970s. I'll have to check.

Best wishes.

Reply to this post

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Reply #67)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 10:55 AM

Klaralven (7,510 posts)

68. Most of those things were in limited production as options on a few models.

Take the Chrysler disc brakes. They were not caliper disc brakes as is used in all modern cars, but clutch-type disc brakes. They were discontinued after '54.

Chrysler's Pioneering Disc-Brake System Explained

https://www.motortrend.com/how-to/chryslers-pioneering-disc-brake-system-explained/

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:34 PM

MichMan (8,513 posts)

38. Always heard that Nader never had a driver's license in his entire life

Expert on cars, but never actually ever drove one

Reply to this post

Response to MichMan (Reply #38)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 02:37 PM

UnderThisLaw (308 posts)

39. Personally, I'm more

worried that we had a President who never had a job involving government in his life

Reply to this post

Response to MichMan (Reply #38)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 10:19 PM

Hassin Bin Sober (25,413 posts)

58. Harvard trained attorney who got his info from hundreds of filed cases against the auto mfrs.

You know like cases where the manufacturers knew people would die needlessly but they wanted to save a buck or two on safety equipment.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 04:40 PM

yellowcanine (35,482 posts)

56. The original Corvairs did have an oversteer problem which could lead to upsets on turns.

https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/classic-cars/a13733502/yes-the-chevrolet-corvair-really-was-a-handful-to-drive/

Was it "unsafe at any speed?" Probably not, but at moderately aggressive driving speeds on a winding road, yes, there was a problem.
And it really is not reasonable to expect the average driver of a street car to adhere to such unusual differences in tire pressure between front and rear tires. The fact that this was recommended suggests that GM engineers realized there was a problem. The car should have been recalled and fixed before Nader even got it. There were some after market fixes which helped and most of the problems were corrected in later models.

"A pair of short half shafts connected the [rear] wheels to the frame-mounted differential. Only the inboard ends of the shafts could articulate, so as the suspension compressed or extended, the wheels tilted at extreme angles. This had the effect of dramatically reducing the rubber on the road. In an aggressive turn, the rear end tended to lose traction before the front, causing oversteer, or fishtailing. That wasn’t all, however. There was a chance, a slim one, that the outside rear wheel could tuck in under the body and potentially trip the car into a rollover. These effects were further exasperated when owners failed to heed the Corvair’s unconventional recommended tire pressures: 15 psi in the front and 26 psi in the rear."

Webster took two Corvairs—including a yellow four-door that, get this, was originally owned by Ralph Nader—to an airfield to see what they'd do in different cornering scenarios. Almost immediately, he experienced oversteer that only got worse as the speeds rose:

"To avoid spinning the car, I have to counter-steer almost immediately after initiating the turn. To racers, this behavior is known as “loose,” and it’s generally preferred to a front end that simply understeers, or plows. But I could see how the lightly trained driver might get into trouble. That was Nader’s point: The average driver wasn’t equipped to handle an over-steering car."

Reply to this post

Response to yellowcanine (Reply #56)

Wed Sep 22, 2021, 04:51 PM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

57. swing axles were on Porches and VW's

My VW was the last of the swing axles. In the NTSA finding it was no more dangerous than any other car. He rigged his test.

Reply to this post

Response to yellowcanine (Reply #56)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 05:01 PM

Brother Mythos (1,442 posts)

77. I had a major 'no steer' problem driving a Corvair. The car was so back end heavy, that ...

at higher speeds on a long, straight, uphill section of highway, the front wheels came off the ground. When I realized the car was drifting off the road, I left off the throttle. The front tires then dropped back down onto the road, and I was able to steer again. To verify this was not a fluke, I turned around, went back down to the bottom of the hill, and tried it again.

On the second try, I hugged the center of the road, aimed the car straight, and accelerated up the hill. And, once again, I lost the ability to steer. At first, I simply tried turning the steering wheel very gently. But, after realizing the tires were not touching the road, I turned the steering wheel violently from side to side. And, nothing happened. So, I left off the throttle again, the front tires dropped back down onto the road again, and I was able to steer.

The inelegant solution to the problem was to put two pieces of railroad track, each about three feet long, in the front located trunk of the car. Fortunately, I was not the owner. I was merely using it to run an errand for him, and he had not warned me about how badly the car handled.

As the slope of this particular uphill section of highway is by no means unusual steep, I am of the opinion that the Corvair was a deathtrap.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 03:03 AM

cinematicdiversions (1,969 posts)

60. The video states the Ralph Nader cause the car to be produced for more years.

there weer going to kill it in '66 but Nadars's book saved it and as a result they kept it going for years longer

Leno states it was the Mustang that did the car in.

Reply to this post

Response to cinematicdiversions (Reply #60)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 03:09 AM

Celerity (34,295 posts)

61. And says nothing about rigging some test. No evidence provided for claims made.

Reply to this post

Response to Celerity (Reply #61)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:57 AM

Casady1 (1,519 posts)

64. this probably explains it

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:47 AM

Champp (2,114 posts)

63. Covairs were some of the flimsiest, shittiest cars ever built

I don't care what Nader did or didn't do. I know Corvairs up close and personal. They were really crappy cars.

Looked OK, though, if you need some kind of a redeeming feature. Meh.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 10:16 AM

mahatmakanejeeves (50,196 posts)

66. The car that Nader called "unsafe at any speed" wasn't the Corvair. It was

a Cadillac, with huge dagger-shaped tailfins, such as a '59 or '60. I haven't seen the book in years, but IIRC, a bicylist was killed when he ran into a tailfin of a parked Cadillac. Hence the appelation, "unsafe at any speed."

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Thu Sep 23, 2021, 08:47 PM

DickKessler (260 posts)

70. What's the point of this thread?

Reply to this post

Response to DickKessler (Reply #70)

Fri Sep 24, 2021, 08:53 PM

Bucky (52,169 posts)

79. Which is dumber, the 66 Corvair thread or the Dogs Are Too Expensive thread?

Sometimes people talk about things I don't think are interesting. These people should be silenced

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)