HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » BITEGHAZI/DOG-GATE (not t...

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:14 AM

BITEGHAZI/DOG-GATE (not the Onion)

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/biting-biden-dogs/


(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the United States Department of Homeland Security for records of communication between Secret Service officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security (No. 1:21-cv-01194)).

7 replies, 764 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 7 replies Author Time Post
Reply BITEGHAZI/DOG-GATE (not the Onion) (Original post)
JuJuChen May 6 OP
LetMyPeopleVote May 6 #1
mahatmakanejeeves May 6 #7
gratuitous May 6 #2
JuJuChen May 6 #3
Tommy Carcetti May 6 #4
getagrip_already May 6 #5
OAITW r.2.0 May 6 #6

Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:16 AM

1. Larry Klayman needs to be disbarred

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Reply #1)

Thu May 6, 2021, 12:09 PM

7. This is their other whackadoodle, Tom Fitton.

Judicial Watch announced that it filed a FOIA lawsuit against the United States Department of Homeland Security for records of communication between Secret Service officials assigned to the White House regarding the Biden family dogs. READ: http://jwatch.us/4c2h3F


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:17 AM

2. No surprise

Republicans launched an investigation over Socks the cat during the Clinton administration, wanting to know if any public money had been spent on mailing holiday cards to kids who had signed up. So this is totally on brand for Judicial Watch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:18 AM

3. We paid for that folks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:19 AM

4. Sadly, this is not even unprecedented.

https://mashable.com/2017/06/04/socks-the-cat-gop-investigation/

Remember when House Republicans went after Socks the cat?

Republicans seem a bit investigation-shy these days, don't they? Well, as you might remember from election season, that wasn't always the case. During Bill Clinton's administration, House Republicans even called for an inquiry into Socks, the First Cat.

Socks was a fairly normal cat, and by most accounts, he seemed to be a good and cute boy. Adopted by Chelsea Clinton as a lost kitten, he enjoyed the things that most cats do: catnip (which press photographers used to lure him closer on the White House lawn), skulking around the grounds, and loathing his canine counterpart, Buddy the dog.

So what was Socks's crime? For Indiana GOP representative Dan Burton, Socks himself wasn't the issue. The problem was that constituents liked Socks so much, in fact, that they were sending him mail. Of course, since most of the letter writers were children, the White House would respond from Socks.

And Burton wanted to know why taxpayers were fronting Socks's postage.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:44 AM

5. and how many "massages" did taxpayers fund for former guy?

His pets are much more expensive.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JuJuChen (Original post)

Thu May 6, 2021, 11:48 AM

6. Judicial Watch - Harassing Democratic Presidents since 1992.

Another frivolous lawsuit and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread