Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
3. You are right, I worded it incorrectly
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:26 PM
Jan 2012

Does anyone registered at this site still question this country's electronic voting and counting machines?

Peace patriot or anyone else still out there?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
4. EVERYONE at this site questions the electronic voting systems....
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 04:52 PM
Jan 2012

... my personal battle cry is...


Paper ballots, hand counted, in public, cameras rolling.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
6. So, we will agree then that the winner of
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:11 PM
Jan 2012

The Iowa and New Hampsire primaries was actually a selection, correct?

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
8. I shouldn't be speaking for others, but many (most?) DU members are suspicious...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:23 PM
Jan 2012

... of the election process end-to-end.


I don't necessarily agree that it was a "selection". I think there may very well be multiple parties independently rigging things on behalf of their own candidates.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
9. So you believe that there are multiple entities that have access to...
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:28 PM
Jan 2012

Our corrupted voting system? You could be right.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
5. For crissakes they never corrected the Iowa results where Santorum beat Willard by 20 votes.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jan 2012

I honestly don't believe the GOP gives a crap about accuracy. I do believe, however, that the GOP will do anything and everything they can think of to install a Republican in the WH and to take over the Senate. Exit polling will make that more difficult, however, there are a myriad of ways to cheat vis a vis voter suppression and monkeying with the electronic machines. To answer your question, I don't think anybody has forgotten about that.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
7. I disagree..
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:14 PM
Jan 2012

The way things are looking is that Paul will run as an independent thus assuring an Obama second term.

Whether you believe that is a good or bad thing is irrelevant.

 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
10. I wouldn't hang my hat on Paul running third party.
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 05:36 PM
Jan 2012

He has said repeatedly he will not run third party, but his relatively strong showing in NH may give him pause to consider doing just that. However, the south will not be as kind to him at the polls. I agree it is possible but whether it would help or hurt Pres O is debatable. My money is on Romney who already is pretty much the de facto GOP nominee, mostly because the GOP doesn't have the imagination to do anything different than picking the next guy in line. We shall see.

 

hang a left

(10,921 posts)
11. Well kitten, I believe the south will treat Paul better, than you think....
Wed Jan 11, 2012, 06:18 PM
Jan 2012

If primaries results were not tampered with. This Paul has a huge following, all you need to do is cruise around the Internet, or check your local lawn signs. I am in repuke central and there are hand made signs everywhere.

Rubber meets road; we are not in control of our "selection".

We know that our voting system has been compromised. Yet some still participate as if...

Don't get it twisted, I have no dog in this race. How can you doubt our election process in one sense and not doubt in the other?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just curious re the conse...