Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInvestigating a Crisis: A Comparison of Six U.S. Congressional Investigatory Commissions
Link to tweet
Tweet text:
Just Security
@just_security
New resource:
An in-depth report on the design and outcomes of past congressional investigative commissions (9/11 Commission and others before it).
Introduction by @AndyMcCanse
Report by @HJSzilagyi and Nick Tonckens
#CovidCommission #Jan6Commission
Investigating a Crisis: A Comparison of Six U.S. Congressional Investigatory Commissions
A report that surveys the design, powers, and outcomes of significant congressionally created investigative commissions.
justsecurity.org
9:03 AM · Apr 6, 2021
Just Security
@just_security
New resource:
An in-depth report on the design and outcomes of past congressional investigative commissions (9/11 Commission and others before it).
Introduction by @AndyMcCanse
Report by @HJSzilagyi and Nick Tonckens
#CovidCommission #Jan6Commission
Investigating a Crisis: A Comparison of Six U.S. Congressional Investigatory Commissions
A report that surveys the design, powers, and outcomes of significant congressionally created investigative commissions.
justsecurity.org
9:03 AM · Apr 6, 2021
https://www.justsecurity.org/75671/investigating-a-crisis-a-comparison-of-six-u-s-congressional-investigatory-commissions/
Two national traumas the deadly January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol and the COVID-19 pandemic have ignited calls for 9/11-style investigative commissions to handle the primary after action inquiry reports. In August 2016, I made a similar plea for a 9/11 Commission Approach as information began to emerge about Russian measures to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. Such calls have become a standard refrain as the United States seeks to comprehend and absorb seismic events.
Commissions are far from perfect. They are not immune from partisanship. They have mixed track records at generating momentum for their policy recommendations or holding bad actors to account. They can be hamstrung by budgetary limits and arbitrary deadlines. They can face recalcitrant witnesses and inadequate tools to compel them. More cynically, they can be used as an outsourcing mechanism for political figures that want insulation from a thorny topic otherwise known as a hot potato receptacle. And, while the 9/11 Commission is considered the gold standard, its work generated criticism from both the right and left on the political spectrum.
So what is it that gives the commission model an enduring appeal for coming to terms with great national system shocks? While there is no single answer to that question, the perceived legitimacy of an investigative commission is at its core. Legitimacy is commonly defined in political science and sociology as the belief that a rule, institution, or leader has the right to govern, according to the Princeton Encyclopedia of Self-Determination. When shared by many individuals, legitimacy produces distinctive collective effects in society, including making collective social order more efficient, more consensual, and perhaps more just. Put another way, it is the strength of why a leader has the power to hold a position of authority, and the peoples buy-in to that authority. Legitimacy enjoys an especially high premium in an era characterized by increasing partisan polarization.
The commission model of fact-development and policy inquiry offers as one of its chief design concepts a degree of insulation from immediate partisan interests of legislators who will stand for reelection during the course of an investigation. It also offers an ability to select a panel of commissioners from an array of fields with gravitas and appeal that transcends its individual members political orientation. That is the ideal, but opportunities to fall short abound. There is a dynamic relationship between design, personnel, and stakeholder investment that is both elusive and essential to that quest for legitimacy.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 340 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post