Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsgood ?
would you have preferred a great debate performance -- and a lousy jobs report?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1024 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
good ? (Original Post)
kpete
Oct 2012
OP
treestar
(82,383 posts)1. Noooooooooo
I'm a substance over form person myself. People having jobs is way more important.
Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)2. False dilemma. I'll take #3, both!
Curtland1015
(4,404 posts)3. Certainly not. But I still wish President Obama had done better.
I think a better debate performance really could have closed the door for GOOD on RMoney.
But yeah, the good jobs report will definitely help.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)4. Prefer Both.....
However more people with jobs is more important.
elleng
(130,861 posts)5. No but looking again, we got a good debate performance AND a good jobs report.
Pretty good news, and reviews of the debate have energized POTUS.
This debate will be forgotten once they have the next one. Jobs report is a stick in the eye to the republicans.