Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,136 posts)
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:24 AM Oct 2012

I am starting to reconsider my initial dismay about the debate. This might just turn out to our

Last edited Sat Oct 6, 2012, 10:01 AM - Edit history (1)

Advantage in a very big way

All the publicity regarding it has created such a stir that the next debate will go against the traditional view, and even more people will watch the second debate

Most people realize that Romney was lying out of both sides of his mouth, and there is no way that will be left standing unanswered

He cannot say all his answers for the last year were misstatements like he did about the 47%

He has dug a large.hole for himself

No matter what he answers now no one really knows what he stands for

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ananda

(28,858 posts)
12. Agree.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:58 AM
Oct 2012

When Romney went after Lehrer and Big Bird with that gleeful maniacal
psychopathic grin, I knew the rest of the debate didn't really matter...
as long as Obama kept his cool and stayed on message, which he did.

That's why I kept saying that Obama did fine that night!

Lone_Star_Dem

(28,158 posts)
4. From what I have heard, the only people energized by the debate are the Rep base.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 01:51 AM
Oct 2012

However, I'm in a state where we draw a clear line in the sand and don't have "undecideds." We are as politically polarized as any state can be, honestly.

At least we're one hell of a Dem donor state! Being in our situation does make us more willing than many other states to donate and volunteer for those who have a chance.

Anyway, I digress...Most people who cared enough to watch the debates because they wanted to learn more about Romney, also paid attention to the follow up coverage. They've heard by now he was lying. It won't set well.

phylny

(8,379 posts)
6. Yes, and when I *listened* to parts of the debate, I realized without the visual,
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:24 AM
Oct 2012

President Obama sounded more presidential without a doubt, and more reasoned.

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
7. Still a dissapointing performance by the President, in my opinion.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 08:58 AM
Oct 2012

I get what he was going for, but he still stumbled over words, gave weak arguments, didn't make the points he DID try to make in a clear way...

I don't think it hurt us all that much... and it WAS a sound strategy, but he certainly didn't make his best effort.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
8. I knew it wasn't a big deal
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:00 AM
Oct 2012

Obama's performance was disappointing, but I think most people realized it wasn't a deal killer.

Wounded Bear

(58,647 posts)
9. Performance art and immediate responses are overrated......
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:09 AM
Oct 2012

The big thing to take away from the debate is that Romney just wrote an unlimited number of ads for Team Obama.

All they have to do is produce vids with the juxtaposition of Romney talking before and during the debates. The number of lies is really quite breathtaking.

This isn't a sporting event. They don't just tally up the score and walk away. The true results of Wednesday's performance are just being tallied up now. By the time the second debate rolls around, this will not be considered such a Romney win because of all the post-debate flack going down.

 

panzerfaust

(2,818 posts)
10. This sounds like GOP spinning the 47% remarks as being a boost for Rmoney
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 09:24 AM
Oct 2012

And, why - oh WHY - did not Obama bring up the 47% when he had a chance in that debate (as he had been mentioning it on his stumping).

Now it is a dead issue.

Dead ever since Rmoney, in a brilliant move, backed away from his previous defense and simply said "I was wrong about that."

Even the most rabid right-wingers with whom I work had been taken aback by the 47% remark: since most everyone has retired - non income-tax paying - parents or grandparents, non income-tax paying disabled relatives, or children (or themselves!) who are non income-tax paying as they are students, or just starting out in very low-paid jobs.

That was Obama's single strongest card. He did not play it. Now it lies shredded on the path of history.

Do not take me wrong, I see neither candidate as standing for progressive values - for, though Obama is to the left of Rmoney, I think it fair to say that in all other western democracies Obama's positions would be in the middle of the conservative side of the political scale.

Certainly, in the UK, he would be comfortable as a Tory.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am starting to reconsid...