Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:41 AM Dec 2011

President Obama, Veto the National Defense Authorization Act

CCR urges President Obama to veto the NDAA. If he doesn’t, he will bear the blame for making indefinite military detention without trial a permanent feature of the U.S. legal system. He will be responsible for signing into law one of the greatest expansions of executive power in our nation’s history, allowing the government to lock up citizens and non-citizens without the right to fair trial. Indefinite detention is contrary to the most fundamental principles of the rule of law.

The NDAA would essentially prevent President Obama from bringing men from Guantánamo to the U.S. for trial and severely curtail his ability to resettle them in third countries. More than half of the men currently detained at Guantánamo – 89 of the 171 – have been unanimously cleared by the CIA, FBI, NSC and Defense Department for transfer or release. Yet no one has been transferred since last January, when Congress created restrictions similar to those in the NDAA. This marks the longest period without a transfer in the prison camp’s entire 10-year history and only underscores the president’s broken promise and failure to close Guantanamo.

As Obama himself, along with President Bush and NDAA co-sponsor Senator John McCain, acknowledged during the presidential campaign, Guantánamo’s very existence makes us less safe. Indeed, Guantánamo, Obama’s forever prison, has become a global symbol of human rights violations by a country that claims to be the world leader of freedom.

Are these the legacies Obama, the one-time professor of constitutional law, wants for his presidency?http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/12/13-4

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama, Veto the National Defense Authorization Act (Original Post) midnight Dec 2011 OP
sorry but Obama may well want some of these dictatorial powers for himself nt msongs Dec 2011 #1
I just don't see how a Harvard educated President squares this with his time midnight Dec 2011 #2
Things that make ya go 'hmmm,' eh? shift happens Dec 2011 #3
Your right.... There is no explanation... I hope the ACLU is midnight Dec 2011 #5
Agreed !!! - K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2011 #4
"Are these the legacies Obama, the one-time professor of constitutional law, wants for his Citizen Worker Dec 2011 #6
I hope he gets a spine, burrowowl Dec 2011 #7
Obama will sign this. nt bowens43 Dec 2011 #8
Multi-dimensional chess isn't for everyone. GeorgeGist Dec 2011 #9

midnight

(26,624 posts)
2. I just don't see how a Harvard educated President squares this with his time
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:33 AM
Dec 2011

teaching constitutional law?

 

shift happens

(18 posts)
3. Things that make ya go 'hmmm,' eh?
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 01:35 AM
Dec 2011

No, there is no explanation. Ergo, we have to face the inimaginable...

midnight

(26,624 posts)
5. Your right.... There is no explanation... I hope the ACLU is
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 02:22 AM
Dec 2011

getting a one to one with the President..

Citizen Worker

(1,785 posts)
6. "Are these the legacies Obama, the one-time professor of constitutional law, wants for his
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 02:30 AM
Dec 2011

presidency?" Yes, sadly for what little is left of our Constitution.

GeorgeGist

(25,319 posts)
9. Multi-dimensional chess isn't for everyone.
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 09:32 AM
Dec 2011

If Obama signs it, he could 'disappear' all those who voted for it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama, Veto the...