HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Peepaw LOSER tRump asks j...

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:01 AM

Peepaw LOSER tRump asks judge to declare him winner in Pennsylvania despite trailing by 80,000 votes

In a court filing, the Trump campaign asked US District Judge Matthew Brann to consider issuing an order that “the results of the 2020 presidential general election are defective and providing for the Pennsylvania General Assembly to choose Pennsylvania’s electors.”

Led by the president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, the filing is part of Mr Trump bid to amend a 9 November lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania’s result.



https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-pennsylvania-elections-results-judge-b1736592.html

12 replies, 961 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 12 replies Author Time Post
Reply Peepaw LOSER tRump asks judge to declare him winner in Pennsylvania despite trailing by 80,000 votes (Original post)
634-5789 Thursday OP
riversedge Thursday #1
leftieNanner Thursday #3
ret5hd Thursday #4
leftieNanner Thursday #5
ret5hd Thursday #6
leftieNanner Thursday #9
634-5789 Thursday #8
leftieNanner Thursday #10
underpants Thursday #2
Tanuki Thursday #7
riversedge Thursday #11
sarcasmo Thursday #12

Response to 634-5789 (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:04 AM

1. OMG. Trump is insane! How long do we have to put up with this stinking crap??

I had to take some deep breaths.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to riversedge (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:09 AM

3. He's paving the way

To SCOTUS. He thinks that "his" justices will win it for him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Reply #3)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:25 AM

4. Do you think they would not?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ret5hd (Reply #4)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 12:44 PM

5. No, I actually don't

They landed their lifetime gigs and aren't beholden to him in the slightest. Don't think it will be 9-0 though.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Reply #5)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 01:06 PM

6. Why would someone that was chosen...

based solely on their particular blend of constitutional/political/religious/societal beliefs, and that those beliefs are the desire of their particular conception of Gawd, NOT willingly and eagerly leap gloriously into that decision?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ret5hd (Reply #6)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 01:20 PM

9. Well, I certainly hope you are wrong!



I can see Amy Coney Barrett, Clarence Thomas, and Alito voting to keep Trump in power. Gorsuch, Roberts, and the other three - not so much.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to leftieNanner (Reply #3)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 01:19 PM

8. SCOTUS will never hear this tomfoolery.

There's 2 more courts that would have to deny these insane claims before every getting that high in the judicial system.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 634-5789 (Reply #8)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 01:22 PM

10. I agree with you

But it's all about delaying and stalling. That's The Orange One's MO. But while he does this, state after state will certify their elections and it will be done. I am seriously looking forward to December 14th!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 634-5789 (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:09 AM

2. This is the one that I will exhale after

I know it’s really unlikely that the Judge will decide in Trump’s favor but until he does I’m not counting anything out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 634-5789 (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 01:09 PM

7. Why are the courts tolerating this nonsense? I know they are throwing the cases

out right and left, but at this point can't they impose sanctions for frivolous lawsuits, vexatious litigation, or the like?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 634-5789 (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:12 PM

11. A clown show for sure

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to 634-5789 (Original post)

Thu Nov 19, 2020, 11:29 PM

12. Pee-Paw wants to count the votes .

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread