HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Pennsylvania Supreme Cour...

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:18 PM

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Trump's Only Election Lawsuit Win

BY†JASON EASLEY

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Trumpís Only Election Lawsuit Win

https://www.politicususa.com/2020/11/17/trump-election-lawsuit-win-overturned.html

"SNIP.....

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling on the only election challenge that Trump has won.

The Philadelphia Inquirer reported, ďIn a 5-2 decision, the court overturned a lower court decision that ordered monitors with President Donald Trumpís campaign be allowed within six feet of tables where ballots were being tallied. In its opinion, the Supreme Court found that the Philadelphia Board of Elections complied with requirements for observer access from the moment the first votes were counted.Ē

Trump is now 0 for 25 in his legal challenge to the results of the election. It is clear that Trump has no evidence that the election was anything other than a free and fair total rejection of the incumbent. Trump might be making history as the first candidate ever to lose every single election challenge that he has brought.
Trump is zero for everything. He is quickly running out of legal venues in Pennsylvania. The Georgia recount/audit is not expected to change the results in the state, as Trump is getting shutdown and running out of playing field to keep the charade of a legal challenge to the election results going.

.....SNIP"

24 replies, 3568 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 24 replies Author Time Post
Reply Pennsylvania Supreme Court Overturns Trump's Only Election Lawsuit Win (Original post)
applegrove Nov 18 OP
applegrove Nov 18 #1
The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 18 #5
Captain Zero Nov 18 #9
reACTIONary Nov 18 #23
MyOwnPeace Nov 18 #14
NoRoadUntravelled Nov 18 #6
Mme. Defarge Nov 18 #8
NoRoadUntravelled Nov 18 #10
Miigwech Nov 18 #18
Statistical Nov 18 #11
Bernardo de La Paz Nov 18 #17
Andy823 Nov 18 #2
Bleacher Creature Nov 18 #3
central scrutinizer Nov 18 #4
Moostache Nov 18 #13
Blue Owl Nov 18 #7
George II Nov 18 #12
ffr Nov 18 #15
2Legit Nov 18 #16
Cha Nov 18 #19
Warpy Nov 18 #20
BigmanPigman Nov 18 #21
Roc2020 Nov 18 #22
BobTheSubgenius Nov 18 #24

Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:20 PM

1. Someone said Rudy just wants a whole pile of decisions againts Trump

he can then appeal all the way to the Supreme Court. How does that work? Are thete not several layers of judges they have to get through first?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:29 PM

5. That wouldn't be possible because there are so many cases

brought on different grounds, involving different state laws and different legal issues, and they would all have to go through several layers of different courts. I can't imagine any way to consolidate these cases - unless Rudy intends to petition for certiorari separately after getting shot down by the layers of lower courts. I think he is just trying to gum up the works to keep states from certifying their election results.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #5)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:35 PM

9. Gumming things up to prevent certifications of elections? And then they make a push to

have legislatures designate an electoral college delegation favorable to Trump.
Sometimes I feel we are just whistling in the dark here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Captain Zero (Reply #9)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 06:28 PM

23. These suites don't stop certification, and even...

... if the SCOTU were to take one or two up, they dont have to schedule them until later in the term. The probably don't want to be involved.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #5)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:24 PM

14. May I ask.....

as if I were a 3rd. grader standing there with an American flag in my hand:

"I think he is just trying to gum up the works to keep states from certifying their election results."

How does that Make America Great Again?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:30 PM

6. Rudy Giuliani the Supreme Court Jester.



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NoRoadUntravelled (Reply #6)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:34 PM

8. Good one!

Wish Iíd thought of it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Mme. Defarge (Reply #8)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:36 PM

10. Thanks!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to NoRoadUntravelled (Reply #6)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:52 PM

18. Too RICH!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:44 PM

11. As Bush v Gore shows you only need one case.

You need one GOOD case though. The Dumpster fire approach to this legal battle like all things Trump is unlikely to do anything but piss of judges and make SCOTUS not to come within five miles of any case.

Also unlike 2000 overturning a single state would not be sufficient. This is Trump being ignorant and small and pathetic and not being able to admit he lost. He is a loser.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Reply #1)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:47 PM

17. Now on to Step Two






Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:21 PM

2. Yep still a loser!

He should just give up since he is embarrassing himself more and more.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:23 PM

3. So much winning!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:26 PM

4. 0-25!

Thatís up there with the Washington Generals for futility. And the ineptitude is just as entertaining.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to central scrutinizer (Reply #4)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:21 PM

13. Well....Loser - 45 is racking up an impressive list of losses...

2016 Popular Vote >2.8M vote loser
2016 Electoral College --- FARCE..."wins" with fewer votes

2020 Popular Vote >6.0M vote loser (pending final tallies)
2020 Electoral College --- 306 - 232 Trumpian 'landslide' margin

2020 Sore Loser Suits --- 0 for 25 including some classic harangues from the bench and Rudy not knowing what "opacity" is...classic.

Loser - 45
0 for 2020 in everyway imaginable...that's right wittle Donnie 2-scoops, YOU ARE A MASSIVE LOSER (Again, as always, same as it always was!)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 03:34 PM

7. Bwaaaaaahahahaha!

It's beautiful... just beautiful to see that fat piece of shit getting flushed...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:15 PM

12. That was their only win so far, now reversed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:25 PM

15. womp womp!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:37 PM

16. Good luck with that!

The Supreme Court doesn't take cases that they want no part of. This election would be one of them. Any of these cases would immediately go into the circular file.

Rudy, of all people, should know this and he does. This, for him, is a money grab, nothing more, nothing less. He has to, at least, show his client that he is all in no matter how ridiculous they both look.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:53 PM

19. 0-25 for Democracy! TY!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 05:57 PM

20. Dumdum wanted his stooges seated at the table and poring over every ballot

in an attempt to toss any with any irregularities from a dog eared corner to a stray pencil mark.

Dumdum is a micromanager of the worst sort and most of these suits are complaining about his stooges not being able to do that for him. Party observers are always kept at a distance so they won't get in anybody's hair and he's just going to have to deal with that.

At some point, even that senile old crook Giuliani is going to have to tell him he lost. The sooner that happens, the better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 06:18 PM

21. Is he going to continue these lawsuits until Jan 20th?

Someone needs to put him out of our misery now!!! Make is painfill and drawn out and on live TV too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 06:18 PM

22. As the days pass by Trump is only

hurting his supporters the republican party family and associates. He may not care but that's all he is doing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to applegrove (Original post)

Wed Nov 18, 2020, 06:40 PM

24. But....but...

...it's the best fund-raising grift he has going. He's fast running out of those, too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread