Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOpinions Trump did far worse in the election than we should have expected
WaPo via MSNBut the truth is that Trump did far worse in last weeks election than he should have, and that his reelection campaign was a historic failure. Incumbency is a far greater advantage, this year, than it has been made out to be. And during an ongoing crisis, American voters tend to choose the devil they know over the one they dont. Its really hard to overstate the incumbent advantage in U.S. politics. In most cases, incumbent presidents not only win reelection, but also substantially increase their popular-vote margin. Twenty-one American presidents have served a second term. Among these, only three were unable to grow their vote share significantly in their second election. Between their first and second elections, Thomas Jefferson, Ulysses S. Grant and Ronald Reagan doubled their popular-vote margins over their opponents. Franklin D. Roosevelt improved his by 80 percent, and Bill Clinton by 50 percent.
Four out of the five biggest landslide elections in the 20th century were won by first-term incumbents: Richard M. Nixon in 1972, Reagan in 1984, Roosevelt in 1936 and Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. Five of the most decisive electoral college landslides across U.S. history setting aside George Washingtons, as he had no opponents also have been won by incumbents: Jefferson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Nixon, Reagan and Abraham Lincoln.
The presidential historian Allan Lichtman told NPR that this is because incumbents have name recognition, national attention, fundraising and campaign bases, control over the instruments of government, successful campaign experience and the benefit of voters risk aversion. This can manifest as an aversion to any new risk over substantial risks people are already experiencing. Incumbents can win in recessions. Incumbents can win when lots of Americans are dying. Incumbents win even during periods of exceptionally low American satisfaction with the state of the nation. Some incumbents win reelection handily during periods of national crisis or scandal think George W. Bush in 2004 against the backdrop of the faltering Iraq War and his top weapons inspectors admission that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction.
Four out of the five biggest landslide elections in the 20th century were won by first-term incumbents: Richard M. Nixon in 1972, Reagan in 1984, Roosevelt in 1936 and Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. Five of the most decisive electoral college landslides across U.S. history setting aside George Washingtons, as he had no opponents also have been won by incumbents: Jefferson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Nixon, Reagan and Abraham Lincoln.
The presidential historian Allan Lichtman told NPR that this is because incumbents have name recognition, national attention, fundraising and campaign bases, control over the instruments of government, successful campaign experience and the benefit of voters risk aversion. This can manifest as an aversion to any new risk over substantial risks people are already experiencing. Incumbents can win in recessions. Incumbents can win when lots of Americans are dying. Incumbents win even during periods of exceptionally low American satisfaction with the state of the nation. Some incumbents win reelection handily during periods of national crisis or scandal think George W. Bush in 2004 against the backdrop of the faltering Iraq War and his top weapons inspectors admission that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1039 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Opinions Trump did far worse in the election than we should have expected (Original Post)
Algernon Moncrieff
Nov 2020
OP
RAB910
(3,445 posts)1. Trump abused his power to the max
Putting his name on our tax dollar checks that were sent out
He and his staff regularly abusing the Hatch act
Trump taking credit for anything good Covid related
Trump taking credit for the Obama economy
Trump taking tax dollars (tariffs) and bribing farmers with it
Spazito
(49,750 posts)2. Great read...
Definitely puts things in perspective, imo.
Thanks for posting this.
dsc
(52,129 posts)3. W didn't win handedly
he had a fairly narrow popular vote majority and his EV majority was within the spread of Ohio which he narrowly won.
Blue Owl
(49,909 posts)4. Makes Donny just that much more of a FAILURE
uponit7771
(90,225 posts)5. K&R, ... and Red Don text book cheated early and often from other countries to US mail system
kurtcagle
(1,601 posts)6. I wonder if this is playing out in the man on the street responses
There have been Trumpist protests about the election, but they are surprisingly anemic, given the closeness of the race and the supposedly rabid base. Gives me hope that Trump's attempts at ginning up the posse will come to naught.
crickets
(25,896 posts)7. K&R for visibility.
In It to Win It
(8,140 posts)8. Preach!
Awesome read!