Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fahrenthold451

(436 posts)
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:41 PM Nov 2020

Federal Judge Rejects Efforts to Invalidate Houston Votes

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-02/judge-expresses-skepticism-on-bid-to-invalidate-texas-votes?srnd=premium&utm_source=url_link

A federal judge rejected a bid by Republican activists to invalidate 127,000 votes in the most populous county in Texas.

“For lack of a nicer way of saying it, I ain’t buying it,” U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen said at a hearing Monday in Houston, rejecting the request by Republican activists because of lack of standing.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Rejects Efforts to Invalidate Houston Votes (Original Post) Fahrenthold451 Nov 2020 OP
Great news indeed!!! SKKY Nov 2020 #1
Yeah KewlKat Nov 2020 #2
Curious about the reason: Lack of Standing. Can any law type DUer's explain? OAITW r.2.0 Nov 2020 #3
Lawyer speak for 'not a leg to stand on'? babylonsister Nov 2020 #6
The judge remarked that the plantiffs would have had to prove that the secretary of state drray23 Nov 2020 #8
Yeah, there's a scary moment when you think that maybe another plaintiff could Fahrenthold451 Nov 2020 #13
Yeah, there's a scary moment when you think that maybe another plaintiff could Fahrenthold451 Nov 2020 #14
K&R Blue Owl Nov 2020 #4
Damn, Sir The Magistrate Nov 2020 #5
Bush-appointed conservative judge no less. N/T IllinoisBirdWatcher Nov 2020 #7
I know it kwolf68 Nov 2020 #10
Thanks for that.. wonder if bush Cha Nov 2020 #16
JMHO since the TX supreme ct already weighed in, the decision would be on his shoulders alone Thekaspervote Nov 2020 #9
Trump has bad lawyers everywhere. The worst TeamPooka Nov 2020 #11
BRAVO! Girard442 Nov 2020 #12
TY, Fahenthold! This is Grand NEws! Cha Nov 2020 #15

drray23

(7,615 posts)
8. The judge remarked that the plantiffs would have had to prove that the secretary of state
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:47 PM
Nov 2020

had "evil intentions" setting up a drive thru voting. That was not proven to him.

Fahrenthold451

(436 posts)
13. Yeah, there's a scary moment when you think that maybe another plaintiff could
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:53 PM
Nov 2020

Prevail with the same argument, but that it's not the case here. Lack of standing can also mean that your case is such a huge piece of sh*t that you need to go away.

Fahrenthold451

(436 posts)
14. Yeah, there's a scary moment when you think that maybe another plaintiff could
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:53 PM
Nov 2020

Prevail with the same argument, but that it's not the case here. Lack of standing can also mean that your case is such a huge piece of sh*t that you need to go away.

Thekaspervote

(32,684 posts)
9. JMHO since the TX supreme ct already weighed in, the decision would be on his shoulders alone
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:48 PM
Nov 2020

Didn’t want to take that responsibility

Girard442

(6,063 posts)
12. BRAVO!
Mon Nov 2, 2020, 04:50 PM
Nov 2020

I’ve gotten cynical in my old age and think that one of the reasons the judge ruled in our favor is that he realized that Dirtbag Donny won’t be around to reward him for shivving justice.

Still, a win is a win is a win.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Judge Rejects Eff...