General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton had favorability polls in the mid-60's - until she became the candidate against DJT.
It was all strange and new territory, the name-calling, the insults, the racism, the misogyny, etc. The Trump campaign was a novelty campaign that could not be fully comprehended.
Hillary had rehabilitated her image after Bill's unseemly exit from the Presidency. She was highly respected by about 65% of the people, in some polls, until she was attacked by the tactics and language of Donald Trump and the Republican Party. She had been a successful and hard-working Secretary of State, although heavily criticized for the Benghazi attacks on our CIA agents, until she was called to carry the banner for the Democratic Party. Our country was not accustomed to such a style of politics, at that time.
The personal attacks and the name-calling were especially crude and disrespectful. It was not the proudest moment in American politics.
Was Hillary as disliked, as most in the media are now reporting, or was she more of a victim of character assassination by Trump and the Republicans?

betsuni
(27,622 posts)Corrupt, neoliberal, status quo, Wall St., corporatist, establishment, third way, elite, centrist, identity politics, ideologically and morally bankrupt, beholden to the "donor class" and oligarchs and lobbyists, lesser of two evils, racist, warmonger, weathervane, liar, etc. That wasn't coming from Republicans.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,839 posts)She was hated pretty equally by the far left and far right. Biden is not liked much by the left either but more people are willing to hold their nose to vote for him to get rid of Trump.
groundloop
(12,650 posts)I resent it when people claim their 'holding their nose' to vote for Biden, and it doesn't do us any favors. That statement is right up there with claiming that both parties are the same, or that Biden is only marginally better than tRump.
LizBeth
(11,143 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)from Fall of 2013 way before trump came into play,
https://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/hillary-clinton-favorable-rating
NewJeffCT
(56,844 posts)and then Republicans went to work attacking her because they knew she was the presumptive favorite to win in 2016.
The Benghazi machine cranked up over the next 3-4 years to throw red meat to the GOP base, drive up fundraising and all the noise from the GOP eventually crept into the maintream.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,839 posts)And Republicans (I think including Meadows) flat out admitted that that was the intended result of all of their Benghazi conspiracy theory-mongering.
karynnj
(60,162 posts)There was a strong downward slope in favorability and increase in not favorable starting in 2013. The article speaks of 2015-2016, but the turning point is very clearly 2013. Incidentally, had they said 2013-2016 the point would still have been the same. Though she announced in 2015, there was no question that she was almost certain to run starting in 2013.
In 2013, few would have thought Trump would be the Republican nominee.
Arazi
(7,599 posts)It's one thing to be a public servant, an entirely other thing to be President.
A lot of people just viscerally did not want her to be President. She (and her most fervent supporters) would never acknowledge that.
Still can't
Happyhippychick
(8,422 posts)Trump and the Republicans didnt need to do a thing when they had people like her attacking Hillary at every chance.
AmericanCanuck
(1,102 posts)That is when her downward trajectory started
WyLoochka
(1,643 posts)She had a very high favorability rating after working hard as a Senator and serving with distinction as Secretary of State. Trey Gowdy and other Repubs said the relentless hammering on Benghazi and emails was specifically drummed up in order to bring her ratings down.
The viciousness worked. I am dismayed at the number of people who rally in support of cruelty. It is still working with far too many. Americans are becoming known as mean people. We will be pariahs in the world if we can't overcome the mean November 3.
Skraxx
(3,154 posts)I was incredibly disappointed in A LOT of Dems and people on the left who bought into it. It was revolting.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)Sure her approval ratings were in the 60s until that uppity woman had the gall think she could run for president....
ffr
(23,152 posts)Plus the horserace stories they kept at until people began believing that same E-mail story must be true, it's all the news outlets, all of the news outlets (Andrea Mitchell) were talking about.
Not one positive story about the fact, as you mention, her rock star popularity when she's in office. People are certainly okay with her then, just not as a candidate, Andrea?