General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump to pull all ads out of Florida. Campaign only focusing on OH, MN, MI & PA
What does this mean?
1. Ohio is not locked down and they realize they MUST win it.
2. If Ohio is not locked down, I suspect they aren't sure Florida is, either, but likely have to gamble with Florida to lock down Ohio as losing both would be devastating.
3. Wisconsin seems to be gone for them if they're moving ads from there. I seriously doubt it's due to confidence of winning.
4. Minnesota also means they realize they have to flip a state, which fits the idea they see Wisconsin as being gone.
Link to tweet
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)He's losing by 13 there lmao more waste of money and time for him.
Mister Ed
(5,928 posts)They're already being counted.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)Unless some hardcore ratfucking happens there. But I don't think he's winning there whatsoever.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)They set thetarget there 4 years ago, and now even though it never played out ( at least that is what most say) they continue to deep their heels deeper into MN. They are into more than numbers in their pea heads some determined mission for trump
https://time.com/5891409/minnesota-trump-biden-2020/
No Republican presidential candidate has won Minnesota since 1972. But Trump outperformed expectations to come within 1.5 points in 2016, and his campaign has touted Minnesota as one of its top 2020 pickup targets. Like its Midwestern neighbors, the state has seen its rural areas trend increasingly Republican even as its urban and suburban areas increasingly vote Democratic. Nineteen counties in whats known as greater Minnesotaa term used to refer to areas outside the Twin Cities region, or non-urban areas more generallyflipped from supporting Barack Obama in 2012 to Trump in 2016, even as Hillary Clinton improved on Obamas margins in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
AZ a previous target worked a while but look at it now
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)his ego won't allow it
lunasun
(21,646 posts)they could turn MN .
https://time.com/5891409/minnesota-trump-biden-2020/
Just another example how he and his idiot campaigners wont let it go when it's already long gone
What do they care it is not their $$$ they can spend it all on their ridiculous dead end bet
Another state that will piss him off in November
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)NorthOf270
(290 posts)And they're just like "Ok whatever".
durablend
(7,460 posts)That means Murder 45 will be superspreading all over PA in the next week.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)qazplm135
(7,447 posts)I'd put ALL my money in three places...Ohio, Florida, and PA and nowhere else.
He simply HAS to win all three of those states or he has no chance.
Spending money and time in Minnesota is nuts. Even if he wins it, it won't likely be the tipping point, PA would.
Heck, it would make more sense to make AZ or NV his fourth state. It's closer there.
He ain't winning Michigan.
Florida is going to be close. It's always close. Not making it a centerpiece of your final days is beyond stupid. Particularly when you HAVE to have it to win.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Statistical
(19,264 posts)If he keeps the Trump 2016 states minus MI and WI then he still wins.
Biden could win all over the map but he could just barely lose all over the map (down 2 in FL, down 1 in NC, etc). So OH, PA, and FL make sense. MI doesn't really and MN is just nuts.
As I said in another post I think it is Trump needing to be a winner. He wants to win one of the states he didn't win in 2016.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)Because they are boneheads , they probably feel they have to prove their goal instead of focusing on FL, which I agree with you I would pick as a focus. so many variables there they can work too . Big state
see post # 28 about MN
https://time.com/5891409/minnesota-trump-biden-2020/
AZ&NV? I think both will go blue maybe the trump campaign does too
stillcool
(32,626 posts)with elections in the past...especially Kenneth Blackwell in 2004
During and after the 2016 campaign, Manafort and Kilimnik spoke and met multiple times. The two talked about strategies to defeat Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, according to the report, citing a conversation Kilimnik had with an associate in which he said Manafort had a "clever plan of screwing Clinton." The two also talked about how Trump might win, the report said, noting that Manafort expected Kilimnik to share the information to people in Ukraine and elsewhere.
The report said Kilimnik sought to leverage his relationship with Manafort and use him to influence the Trump administration and the Russian government "to effect a certain political outcome."
In one of two meetings with Kilimnik during his tenure as Trump campaign chairman, "Manafort briefed Kilimnik on the state of the Trump Campaign and Manafort's plan to win the election," the Mueller report concluded. "That briefing encompassed the campaign's messaging and its internal polling data. According to Gates, it also included discussion of 'battleground' states, which Manafort identified as Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/18/senate-details-paul-manafort-ties-russian-intel-officer-kilimnik/3390437001/
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)is he is banking on Disantis doing the dirt for him there ...
I would expect Florida to be even worse of a shitshow than it normally is.
I mean, expect some blatant, out in the open bullshit.
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)Trumpdumper
(171 posts)MN +10
WI -10
FL -29
So that's a net loss of 29 EVs from 2016, leaving Trump with 306-29 = 277.
Of course, that means too that Trump needs to cross fingers that he holds all the other '16 states, including AZ.
Or maybe they really think FL will come through but are conceding AZ, leaving them with 295 (or 285 if they can't pull in MN, or 269 if they also lose MI).
A poll in MN today had Biden up 15.
MN sounds like fool's gold for GOP.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Oh, well. We'll know pretty soon.
Now I'm going to go pour a glass of wine and chant some.
NorthOf270
(290 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,293 posts)Does he think he has it in the bag? Is the fix in?
Or is the Trump campaign a flaming dumpster fire?
Minnesota seems odds. Many some internals giving them false hope?
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)But I guess I'll expand on it:
Say his internals put him at +2 in Florida. But his internals in Ohio put him at +.5, essentially a tie, it makes political sense to pull ads and resources out of Florida to do everything you can to win Ohio.
Trump can still win if he loses Florida (though it'll be a tough). He cannot win if he loses both Florida and Ohio.
Minnesota is clear: if they're not focused on Wisconsin, it likely means they think it's lost. So, they're trying to find 10 electoral votes to make up for it. They need to flip a state now because if Biden wins all of Hillary's states + WI, MI & NC, he wins.
ffr
(22,669 posts)So they haven't given up here.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)But they can't win without PA. This is a Hail Mary.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)They're gambling that they can win it but going into Ohio is proof they're not certain because he can't win the election if he loses both Florida and Ohio. He can theoretically still win even if he loses Florida.
But he has no choice but to risk Florida to save Ohio, which they clearly believe is at risk.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)and cross-pollenation of the electorates. If they have very limited funds left and they have to choose between two states they think they're gonna win (OH vs FL), it's probably a safer return on investment to go with a regional strategy.
FL is traditionally a clustf***. The rust belt swung unexpectedly hard for Trump in 2016 and the campaign likely thinks that's their best chance at scoring an upset.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)So, not sure where you're getting the "clearly think they're going to win" idea. If they did, they'd just focus that money in PA or WI, the latter they're pulling ads out of.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)they think they will win, OH is the more logical choice to spend on because it's in the heart of the rust belt. This move doesn't mean they're writing off FL or that they're in trouble in OH.
Neither OH or FL are "clearly" theirs. It's certainly possible they're seeing more worrisome signs in Ohio than in FL. But even if they aren't, spending in FL doesn't contribute to any Hail Mary upset strategy, while spending in OH might.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)The fact they are, after winning the state by ten four years ago, indicates they're worried they may be losing it.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)I see only a shot for him in OH.
fescuerescue
(4,448 posts)Ohio is always critical. No one wins without Ohio.
It's a little weird that he's ignoring florida in favor of Minnesota though.
There are some good and bad theories that could come from that.
wishstar
(5,268 posts)and because of his nasty false attack ads I can't stand to watch my local ABC affiliate
tavernier
(12,380 posts)Statistical
(19,264 posts)Trump is doing worse in MN that WI or PA.
Still it is a retreat to the vital states. I agree with you FL is a coin flip but he has to get lucky somewhere and FL is an expensive state. He needs to keep PA and OH. MI is a backup.
MN is just weird. Probably Trump refusing to give up. He wants to show he is a winner and can take one of the Clinton 2016 states.
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)He's going with the premise that he can get SCOTUS to invalidate everything that isn't counted by the end of E-day. Do these states wait to count mail ins?
Mister Ed
(5,928 posts)I don't know about the others.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Minneapolis-st Paul and Duluth media markets cross over into Western WI.
NewsCenter28
(1,835 posts)If you had to make a call, which I certainly won't hold you to, do you think we win it?
Also, the polling is looking really good in Georgia and North Carolina. Do you think I'm absolutely insane to think we could win either NC or GA without winning FL, i.e., worst case scenario that FL goes T because it's "gonna Florida" like usual doesn't necessarily mean that GA or NC will fall in line also? I don't think all 3 have to fall exactly the same way, personally. Further, North Carolina's somewhat more educated population could make a difference for us there along with having a Democratic governor to help with turnout.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Assuming he wins AZ. It's much harder, but it can work.
pwb
(11,261 posts)Predictable.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)He's counting on the toss-up states all going his way, plus he needs to get one of the Rust Belt states that's polling well for Biden/Harris.
As explained in this video:
Quixote1818
(28,929 posts)He should probably putting some effort into the ones he is trailing in like AZ and NC.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... to have any chance at all.
Trump has to win ALL of the toss-up states (which includes AZ and NC), plus at least one state from MN, WI, MI or PA where Biden/Harris have significant leads.
It's a long-shot for him, but Trump is desperate to win the EC, not just win more electoral votes in an overall losing cause.
See the video that I posted above your reply.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)It is a hail Mary with a quarterback who can't throw and receivers who can't catch against the best defense in the country.