Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State Of The Race: How Previous Presidential Campaigns Looked Going Into October (CHART) (Original Post) ProSense Sep 2012 OP
It will be interesting to see if citizen's united has an effect on these numbers mucifer Sep 2012 #1
Makes me think of the "mandate" the Rs claimed for Shrub in 2004 treestar Sep 2012 #2
Y'know what's interesting? Liberal Gramma Sep 2012 #3
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2012 #4

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. Makes me think of the "mandate" the Rs claimed for Shrub in 2004
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 01:50 PM
Sep 2012

He actually got over 50% that time!!!!

But then the result in 2008 created no such "mandate."

Liberal Gramma

(1,471 posts)
3. Y'know what's interesting?
Sat Sep 29, 2012, 02:47 PM
Sep 2012

In every case, the Republican picked up points between October and election day. Sometimes, not enough to win,but always an improvement. Does that mean they've been cheating since the 80s? In no case was a Republican's final vote number less than the October polling number; in several, the Democrat's final was lower. Some of the difference is accounted for by undecideds finally deciding, but 6 and 7 point improvements are common. And... contrary to popular opinion, which holds that Clinton won because Perot split the R vote, it appears that most of Perot's late support came from the D column. What I think: we've had the intimidation/voter suppression/vote changing problem for a l-o-n-g time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»State Of The Race: How Pr...