General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmy Klobuchar
bringing up Barrett's comments on Roberts' decision on ACA.
Barrett is obfuscating. She disagreed with Roberts thinking.
Mossfern
(2,483 posts)on ACA. Barrett is obfuscating even though her own comments are put before her.
She says her comments don't count because she wasn't a judge then.
Mossfern
(2,483 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)on judicidary
IcyPeas
(21,857 posts)like 3 trump judges struck down the law about having more drop boxes in that county with 4 million people.
malaise
(268,925 posts)Rec
Ninga
(8,275 posts)albacore
(2,398 posts)...on my "Fantasy President" team...
Or my "stay in the Senate and kick ass" team.
That woman is brilliant. And articulate.
Who do the Republicans have to match her? Old, tired, white retreads.
ginnyinWI
(17,276 posts)Supreme Court Justice? 😊
judeling
(1,086 posts)I know people here have their favorites for AG, but Klobuchar for the immediate needs of the office is absolutely the best possible choice.
There is quite literally no one who has both the breadth and depth of experience of both the judicial and political sides of the job.
What most people do not realize is she was one of the top telecommunications lawyers in the country during the rise of the of the internet. She has been dealing with access and privacy since the beginning. When you consider that she is one of the go to people on anti-trust for the Democrats and that her philosophy leans to what can we do now in advance of new law. We have the only real player ready to take on Social Media and big data. That is essential for all else in today's connected world.
Mossfern
(2,483 posts)voter intimidtion. Holy crap.
Klobuchar citing law.
Senator trying again to elicit any answer.
Nope - "can't comment."
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,668 posts)so they don't say anything that would disqualify them. They can think all the thoughts in there true hearts, but they won't say anything