Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, he was not on oxygen at that moment the doctor was speaking.
I can think of one or two reasons why oxygen would no longer be needed.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 678 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, he was not on oxygen at that moment the doctor was speaking. (Original Post)
boston bean
Oct 2020
OP
mitch96
(13,871 posts)1. They lied about everything pertaining to his health. Why would they tell the truth now? nt
Ms. Toad
(33,999 posts)2. Because - as to the oxygen - they refused to answer the question
that would have required an outright lie: was he ever on oxygen.
mitch96
(13,871 posts)3. So they go for the lie of omission... yes? nt
Ms. Toad
(33,999 posts)4. Definitely - as to the oxygen.
He was asked 3 times.
Each time he started out by declaring he is not currently on oxygen.
The closest he got (on the third try) was that he was not on oxygen at Walter Reed after they settled him in, had not been on oxygen today, and was not on oxygen while some kind of evaluation was going on (it wasn't clear to me whether that was at the White House or Walter Reed) - but it clearly left a time period during which oxygen was used - since you don't deny a simple question that specifically unless you are hiding something.
bif
(22,685 posts)5. Whatever they say, the opposite is true.
Plain and simple. It's an Orwellian Universe now!
boston bean
(36,219 posts)6. Think about why one may not need oxygen.