Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:48 PM

Has anyone dare peak over at Faux to see what they are saying or doing?

8 replies, 698 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

8 replies	Author	Time	Post
Has anyone dare peak over at Faux to see what they are saying or doing? (Original post)	progressive nobody	Sep 2020	OP
They're gonna get a replacement ASAP and since Dems got rid of the filibuster, they only need simple	LuvJoe	Sep 2020	#1
The REPUBLICANS "got rid of the filibuster" for SCOTUS appointments...	regnaD kciN	Sep 2020	#3
....	progressive nobody	Sep 2020	#4
I can't even bear listening to MSNBC. I don't think peaking into the FAUX world will be good for any	Claustrum	Sep 2020	#2
Brit Hume is arguing it would probably be a bad idea to try to replace her before the election.	Rustynaerduwell	Sep 2020	#5
He wasn't on the show after that.	Rustynaerduwell	Sep 2020	#7
Popping champagne and gleeful exuberance.	BlueTsunami2018	Sep 2020	#6
Two things.	Midnight Writer	Sep 2020	#8

Response to progressive nobody (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:50 PM

LuvJoe (50 posts)

1. They're gonna get a replacement ASAP and since Dems got rid of the filibuster, they only need simple

Reply to this post

Response to LuvJoe (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:51 PM

regnaD kciN (25,966 posts)

3. The REPUBLICANS "got rid of the filibuster" for SCOTUS appointments...

...when Democrats tried to filibuster the Gorsuch nomination.

Reply to this post

Response to LuvJoe (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:51 PM

progressive nobody (816 posts)

4. ....

Reply to this post

Response to progressive nobody (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:50 PM

Claustrum (4,781 posts)

2. I can't even bear listening to MSNBC. I don't think peaking into the FAUX world will be good for any

of us right now.

Reply to this post

Response to progressive nobody (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:54 PM

Rustynaerduwell (620 posts)

5. Brit Hume is arguing it would probably be a bad idea to try to replace her before the election.

Actually saying it would be bad for the Country.

Fucker Carlson reporting McConnell will bring a Trump nomination to vote.

Reply to this post

Response to Rustynaerduwell (Reply #5)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:57 PM

Rustynaerduwell (620 posts)

7. He wasn't on the show after that.

Reply to this post

Response to progressive nobody (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 08:55 PM

BlueTsunami2018 (3,245 posts)

6. Popping champagne and gleeful exuberance.

They are positively giddy.

People always like to pretend there is a such thing as karma and that good always prevails over evil.

The reality is quite the opposite.

I didn’t think I could be possibly be any more heartsick but every day brings a new low. I really can’t take much more of this.

Reply to this post

Response to progressive nobody (Original post)

Fri Sep 18, 2020, 09:48 PM

Midnight Writer (20,428 posts)

8. Two things.

1) They are trying not to act too gleeful.

2) They are bending themselves into pretzels trying to explain why the McConnell Rule was a good thing in 2016 but should be ignored by McConnell himself in 2020.

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)