Tue Jun 9, 2020, 12:55 AM
CatWoman (78,729 posts)
Federal Judge, After Reading the Unredacted Mueller Report, Orders DOJ to Explain Itself at Hearing
A federal judge who previously said that Attorney General William Barr “distorted” the findings of the redacted Mueller Report confirmed on Monday that he has finally read the unredacted version. U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton then ordered the Department of Justice to answer his questions “regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report” at an ex parte (one party only) hearing next month.
The much-anticipated development in the lawsuit filed by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), BuzzFeed and BuzzFeed News reporter Jason Leopold comes months after the judge expressed his skepticism about the DOJ’s decision-making in no uncertain terms. The pandemic, as Judge Walton noted, more than threw a wrench in the matter and continues to do so. But Judge Walton, having reviewed the full Mueller Report in his chambers, made clear that he has some questions that the DOJ cannot answer remotely: Having reviewed the unredacted version of the Mueller Report, the Court cannot assess the merits of certain redactions without further representations from the Department. However, because the Court must discuss the substance of the redactions with the Department, and because such a discussion cannot occur remotely due to the lack of a secure connection between the Court and the Department necessary to avoid disclosure of the redacted information, and in light of Chief Judge Howell’s May 26, 2020 Order, In re: Further Extension of Postponed Court Proceedings in Standing Order 20-9 and Limiting Court Operations in Exigent Circumstances Created by the COVID-19 Pandemic, Standing Order No. 20-29 (BAH), it is hereby ORDERED that the status conference currently scheduled for June 18, 2020, is VACATED. Judge Walton, a George W. Bush appointee, ordered the DOJ to appear at a hearing on July 20 at 9:30 a.m. in order to “address the Court’s questions regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report.” In a footnote, the judge said the DOJ should be prepared, “if necessary,” for a continuation of the hearing on July 21 and July 22. Finally, Walton said he would at a later date let the DOJ know which topics the Department “should be prepared to discuss.” https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/federal-judge-after-reading-the-unredacted-mueller-report-orders-doj-to-explain-itself-at-hearing/?fbclid=IwAR36nu0KVEgtsB0TNbnt7G_bTz8qPbM2hYn-c4OYVft4QHUrwnKbJMDWVkM
|
16 replies, 4016 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
CatWoman | Jun 2020 | OP |
Nevilledog | Jun 2020 | #1 | |
crickets | Jun 2020 | #2 | |
uponit7771 | Jun 2020 | #10 | |
malaise | Jun 2020 | #11 | |
Gothmog | Jun 2020 | #3 | |
BootinUp | Jun 2020 | #4 | |
Grasswire2 | Jun 2020 | #5 | |
orleans | Jun 2020 | #6 | |
PRETZEL | Jun 2020 | #12 | |
Hekate | Jun 2020 | #7 | |
smirkymonkey | Jun 2020 | #8 | |
CatWoman | Jun 2020 | #9 | |
pwb | Jun 2020 | #13 | |
BSdetect | Jun 2020 | #14 | |
Kid Berwyn | Jun 2020 | #15 | |
Name removed | Aug 2021 | #16 |
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 01:08 AM
Nevilledog (47,249 posts)
1. Too bad. If it was by video maybe someone could hack it.
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 01:09 AM
crickets (25,145 posts)
2. Well. This just got interesting.
Bill Barr might blow off a summons from Congress, but will he ignore a judge?
|
Response to crickets (Reply #2)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 09:59 AM
uponit7771 (89,029 posts)
10. yes, Barr should be in jail
Response to crickets (Reply #2)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 10:08 AM
malaise (257,279 posts)
11. Very
Who is carrying today's hearing?
|
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 01:38 AM
Gothmog (130,723 posts)
3. Barr's reqaactions were evidnelty bogus
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 01:41 AM
BootinUp (44,434 posts)
4. Getting interesting nt
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 02:00 AM
Grasswire2 (13,067 posts)
5. they got another month + to prepare for this next hearing!
Doesn't anyone ever make Barr hurry to comply?
|
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 03:42 AM
orleans (32,595 posts)
6. just like in school
the judge will let barr know what topics will be discussed
perfect. give doj plenty of time to prepare their bullshit responses |
Response to orleans (Reply #6)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 10:09 AM
PRETZEL (3,231 posts)
12. I don't really have an issue with that
Judge Walton doesn't want them to come in for up to 3 days to have his time wasted. If he's read the unredacted report, chances are he quite possibly has access to the underlying evidence that led to the redactions.
I think he's seen the evidence, now has seen the redactions, and now wants to know why they don't necessarily match up. |
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 10:14 AM
pwb (9,891 posts)
13. Yea there is lots of good shit coming.
Timing is everything.
|
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 10:33 AM
BSdetect (8,905 posts)
14. Meanwhile Barr refuses to appear before the House committee?
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 11:34 AM
Kid Berwyn (12,209 posts)
15. Judge Walton to ex-General Flynn...
“You sold your country out.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/judge-tells-michael-flynn-you-sold-your-country-out-at-hearing.html Wonder if the redactions serve more to cover up treason? |
Response to CatWoman (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed