Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:43 AM Sep 2012

"Why Muslims Decry Prophet Images"

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/09/12/ambassadors-killing-shines-light-on-muslim-sensitivities-around-prophet-mohammed/?hpt=hp_c1

(CNN) – Violence over depictions of the Prophet Mohammed may mystify many non-Muslims, but it speaks to a central tenet of Islam: that the Prophet was a man, not God, and that portraying him threatens to lead to worshiping a human instead of Allah.

“It's all rooted in the notion of idol worship,” says Akbar Ahmed, who chairs the Islamic Studies department at American University. “In Islam, the notion of God versus any depiction of God or any sacred figure is very strong."

“The Prophet himself was aware that if people saw his face portrayed by people, they would soon start worshiping him,” Ahmed says. “So he himself spoke against such images, saying ‘I’m just a man.’”

The prohibition against such portrayals was on stark display Tuesday, as mobs in Egypt and Libya attacked U.S. compounds in response to a film that vilifies the Prophet Mohammed, who founded Islam in the 7th century. The attack on the U.S. personnel in Benghazi, Libya, was orchestrated by extremists who used the protests as a diversion, U.S. sources told CNN Wednesday.
89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Why Muslims Decry Prophet Images" (Original Post) sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 OP
No Excuses...... liberallibral Sep 2012 #1
But there have been artisitc depictions of Muhammed by Islamic artists Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #2
Sad how some people don't even appreciate their own cultural history MNBrewer Sep 2012 #17
Very true. This just lends to my theory that the riots we inevitable Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2012 #23
A humble man wanted to ensure people stayed close to their God. Curtland1015 Sep 2012 #3
I don't think that Mohammed was humble, when he created Islam, he became a warlord, and conquerer braddy Sep 2012 #9
BLASPHEMY!! A HERETIC I AM Sep 2012 #11
LOL, that guy cracks me up. braddy Sep 2012 #19
I keel him first!! n/t texastoast Sep 2012 #54
So what? No one in the Bible ever had multiple wives and concumbines? No one ever brutally killed sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #28
What does this have to do with the OP or the post you are replying to? nt NCTraveler Sep 2012 #40
Mohammed was not just a Muslim, he created Islam. he was a businessman before then. braddy Sep 2012 #66
Dude, the reply was to the statement that Mohammed was a humble man and... yawnmaster Sep 2012 #77
So because he became a warlord and killed and had many wives, we can claim Islam is a false sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #85
No, we can claim he wasn't a humble man. That is the claim that was made... yawnmaster Sep 2012 #88
They Need To Get Over Themselves DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #4
Many Protestant denominations feel the same, even about a cross, yet they don't go crazy. braddy Sep 2012 #5
Which ones don't believe in the depiction of Jesus? sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #6
Here are some examples. braddy Sep 2012 #13
I'm not familiar with Primitive Baptists. sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #47
It's the AnaBaptists...like Amish, Old German Baptist Brethren, Dunkards... countryjake Sep 2012 #59
The ones that actually obey the 10 commandments n/t arcane1 Sep 2012 #52
Fuck that. Marinedem Sep 2012 #7
i dont' care about them decrying anything ProdigalJunkMail Sep 2012 #8
I really don't care what they believe Marrah_G Sep 2012 #10
You do realize that this 'christian' country has a horrible record of murder, don't you? sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #27
Absolutely Marrah_G Sep 2012 #31
Killing anyone because of a religious belief invalidates that religion. L0oniX Sep 2012 #12
Bullshit. Sometimes killing someone is the foundation of a religion. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #15
Bull shit right back at ya. That's so wrong in so many ways. L0oniX Sep 2012 #20
And I would point out to you that Christians and Jews too have killed in the name of God. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #22
I stand by my right to invalidate any and "all" religions. L0oniX Sep 2012 #25
There is no Constitutional amendmant that protects you "from" religion. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #26
My religion is to have no religion. L0oniX Sep 2012 #37
Which precise article of the Constitution contains "In God We Trust"? MNBrewer Sep 2012 #38
Can you point where in the Constitution is the nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #44
Glad I could help you feel better by giving you an opportunity to snark (and lecture). The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #50
Well I prefer this actually in the bill of rights nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #51
Why is it that people don't seem to get that there can't be freedom "of" religion MNBrewer Sep 2012 #58
I agree. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #61
Your sarcasm is bad MNBrewer Sep 2012 #62
Your interpretive powers are weak and you knee jerked a response. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #63
as long as you feel bad, that's enough for me. MNBrewer Sep 2012 #65
I have no problem with that Marrah_G Sep 2012 #32
It's bullshit jsr Sep 2012 #14
What a colossal crock of crap! MNBrewer Sep 2012 #16
Always check your bread jsr Sep 2012 #21
That's not god that's one of the Doobie Brothers. Smickey Sep 2012 #29
wouldnt be surprised if thats the next step loli phabay Sep 2012 #33
Yes. Mohamed saw how the Christians and Jews had fucked it up. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #18
Except that Jews did not have images nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #45
And neither did Christians and Orthodox BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #53
I might counter that with some forms that Christianity has taken around the world nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #57
"It was far more about the tribes that did have worship of idols than Jews or Christians..." The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #55
There is an interesting book named "Catastrophe" (which is now out of print) written in the UK Hestia Sep 2012 #64
I just proves how dangerous religion is, and how ridiculous the entire concept is. JRLeft Sep 2012 #24
Oh, come ON-- BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #56
I would never Blame religon for all of it Confusious Sep 2012 #67
This ^ Religion is part of the my God is better than your God. And the response is JRLeft Sep 2012 #71
So you weigh BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #82
On DU I've always been taught the idea that people treestar Sep 2012 #30
i agree they have the same right of respect but it goes both ways loli phabay Sep 2012 #35
I don't think thats ever been looked into treestar Sep 2012 #36
I'm a gay Atheist, here's something they do that offends me MNBrewer Sep 2012 #39
Their religion has control of the government treestar Sep 2012 #42
And vice versa MNBrewer Sep 2012 #46
Civilized people don't murder for any reason treestar Sep 2012 #73
Historically that has ebbed and flowed, and Christians and Jews have the same issues cthulu2016 Sep 2012 #34
Anthony Quinn's 1976 film: Mohammed, Messenger of God aint_no_life_nowhere Sep 2012 #41
Well, in the Old Testament God forbids the making of idols but Christians simply ignore nanabugg Sep 2012 #60
Don't care. RedCappedBandit Sep 2012 #43
If they follow Navl Sep 2012 #48
Here are 10 types of people the Bible tells you to kill... angstlessk Sep 2012 #49
I am sure Navl Sep 2012 #68
So God had it wrong, but his half human son had it right...... Marrah_G Sep 2012 #70
LOL RedCappedBandit Sep 2012 #74
The Christian belief is that he was 100% human eom yawnmaster Sep 2012 #78
So he isn't really gods son then Marrah_G Sep 2012 #79
if you are that interested, read up. I replied because your joke was, like, huh? eom yawnmaster Sep 2012 #81
And (magically) 100% god, too! MNBrewer Sep 2012 #80
You are mistaken and have taken your statement 'convert or die' out of context. sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #86
That's nice. My original reply remains adequate. nt RedCappedBandit Sep 2012 #75
You obviosly no jack shit about the history of Islam. nt The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #83
Yes I was aware etherealtruth Sep 2012 #69
Thats part of the problem, i think, with the whole idea of "prophets" Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #72
I don't give two tugs of a dead dog's dick what they think about Codeine Sep 2012 #76
There used to be a brilliant scholar of Islam that posted on DU. The Midway Rebel Sep 2012 #84
+10,000 Finally, a serious and honest response! I am shocked by how sinkingfeeling Sep 2012 #87
We certainly go out of our way to rationalize offending other people LanternWaste Sep 2012 #89
 

liberallibral

(272 posts)
1. No Excuses......
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:58 AM
Sep 2012

Any followers of ANY religion, that thinks it's ok to cause chaos and murder innocent people, over friggin' CARTOONS, BOOKS or MOVIES are ANIMALS!!!!

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
2. But there have been artisitc depictions of Muhammed by Islamic artists
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:05 PM
Sep 2012






Lots more at the article --

http://www.religionfacts.com/islam/things/depictions-of-muhammad-examples.htm

Some are aquite beautiful. Many seem to have an oriental, Far Eastern quality to them. Worth a look just for an art appreciation aspecct.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
17. Sad how some people don't even appreciate their own cultural history
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:44 PM
Sep 2012

even here in the US....

and allow demagogues to rile them up into mobs.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
23. Very true. This just lends to my theory that the riots we inevitable
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:55 PM
Sep 2012

The film was just an excuse. Even if the film never existed it would have been something else or just an outright attack.

Curtland1015

(4,404 posts)
3. A humble man wanted to ensure people stayed close to their God.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:07 PM
Sep 2012

...and fringe nut jobs interpret it as "KILL anyone drawing a picture of that man!"

It's the fringe followers that make all religions look crazy.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
9. I don't think that Mohammed was humble, when he created Islam, he became a warlord, and conquerer
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:08 PM
Sep 2012

Not to mention 15 wives and many concubines, and a 6 year old wife.

As the warrior of Islam Mohammed ordered the beheading of between 600-800 Jewish men and sexual enslavement of their women and slavery for the children.

I just don't see him as a humble man.

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
28. So what? No one in the Bible ever had multiple wives and concumbines? No one ever brutally killed
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:20 PM
Sep 2012

people in the name of God?

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
66. Mohammed was not just a Muslim, he created Islam. he was a businessman before then.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:58 PM
Sep 2012

When he switched to founder of Islam, he formed an army became a warlord and started the conquering, gaining sex slaves, and multiple wives for himself, limiting his men to 4 wives, but all the sex slaves they could take.

yawnmaster

(2,812 posts)
77. Dude, the reply was to the statement that Mohammed was a humble man and...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:06 PM
Sep 2012

then it was explained why...that is what so what.
Your so what is nonsensical in this context.

sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
85. So because he became a warlord and killed and had many wives, we can claim Islam is a false
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:34 AM
Sep 2012

religion and Muslim beliefs have no validity? My point is that many of the 'fathers of Christianity' did things that are just as bad. I see very little difference between those two religions or their followers.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,708 posts)
4. They Need To Get Over Themselves
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:11 PM
Sep 2012

My God. Their God. Your God. They are all big enough to withstand the brickbats from some lunatics.

 

braddy

(3,585 posts)
13. Here are some examples.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:24 PM
Sep 2012

Example--Question: Why do Primitive Baptists not have crucifixes or pictures of Jesus in their churches and homes?
The scriptures unequivocally forbid images of God of any kind (Ex 20:4-5, I Cor 10:14, Gal 5:19-21, I Jn 5:21). Since Jesus is the Son of God, and therefore equal with God (Jn 5:18, Philip 2:5-8), pictures of Jesus must also be censured by these commandments.
Pictures of Jesus are in every sense idols. The popular portraits of Jesus are products of man's imagination, and misrepresent Jesus in dishonoring ways.

Here is a link which describes differences between Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, for idols it says. Judaism--"Images and statues forbidden." Christianity--"Images and statues allowed in some denominations, but not worshiped." Islam--"Images and statues forbidden." http://www.chsbs.cmich.edu/fattah/courses/islampolitics/threereligions.htm

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
59. It's the AnaBaptists...like Amish, Old German Baptist Brethren, Dunkards...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:06 PM
Sep 2012

the Old Order religions stemming from the original Reformation who try to lead simple lives, with little falderal or adornment. Only thing on the walls of their meeting houses would be their bonnets and hats; some even refuse to have any images made of themselves, let alone any depiction of their god. They don't recite oaths or creeds, nor pledge allegiance or worship any man-made artifact...they are the conscientious objectors who practice pacifism and pretty much want to be left alone, since their ancestors all came here to avoid religious persecution.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
7. Fuck that.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:55 PM
Sep 2012

Someone's beliefs and sensitivities don't trump anyone's right to life.

I don't give a fuck how offensive it is. Cover your ears and plug your eyes.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
8. i dont' care about them decrying anything
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 12:58 PM
Sep 2012

i care about the religious nuts blowing shit up and killing people. those guys can get bent...

sP

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
31. Absolutely
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:31 PM
Sep 2012

Murder in the name of god is still murder.

Christianity has massive amounts of blood on their hands in the name of God.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
20. Bull shit right back at ya. That's so wrong in so many ways.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:48 PM
Sep 2012

Probably not worth chatting with you about this but I would point out that the new covenant church spoken of in Acts did not kill Jesus.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
22. And I would point out to you that Christians and Jews too have killed in the name of God.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:54 PM
Sep 2012

Are you willing to invalidate them as you have Islam?

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
25. I stand by my right to invalidate any and "all" religions.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:01 PM
Sep 2012

I want and demand my freedom "from" religion.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
26. There is no Constitutional amendmant that protects you "from" religion.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:06 PM
Sep 2012

Only one that gurauntees your freedom "of" religion.

Afterall, in God We Trust.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
44. Can you point where in the Constitution is the
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:49 PM
Sep 2012

"In God we trust?"

I wonder who I have missed it over so many years of reading it every so often..

Or is my CATO Institute produced copy (it was cheap), a bad copy?

Now after the snark, feel much better, it was added to the pledge, written by Bellamy, in the 1880s (an avowed Socialist), oh in the 1950s. Did I mention the Constitution came to be in 1789?

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
50. Glad I could help you feel better by giving you an opportunity to snark (and lecture).
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 04:44 PM
Sep 2012

I am however sorry that no one that repiled in this subtread seems to understand the differnece betweent hthe words "of and "from".

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
51. Well I prefer this actually in the bill of rights
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 04:47 PM
Sep 2012

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

You know the Establishment Clause might explain why... but maybe I am daft.

Have an excellent day. At least you have not told me the lovely trope that this is a Christian nation.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
58. Why is it that people don't seem to get that there can't be freedom "of" religion
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:05 PM
Sep 2012

unless there can be freedom "from" it.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
61. I agree.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:10 PM
Sep 2012

I posted the "In god We Trust" meme to display the paradigm in which we discourse. Do you want to deny that paradigm? Let me gather your armor for you Don Quixote.






eta: missing word

Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
32. I have no problem with that
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:34 PM
Sep 2012

Religion has been the cause of massive amounts of death, pain and destruction.

And each one of them likes to talk about how peaceful and loving they are.

jsr

(7,712 posts)
14. It's bullshit
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:26 PM
Sep 2012

but I respect their right to believe in bullshit as long as they don't go around killing people for disagreeing with their bullshit.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
16. What a colossal crock of crap!
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:43 PM
Sep 2012

Riots and murder in the street because by portraying Mohammed in a Danish newspaper as a cartoon will lead to his being worshipped! How frikkin' ludicrous!

And, wouldn't that mean that only Muslims are prohibited from portraying him? If I eat a bacon, bacon and bacon sandwich will the Muslim bully-thug-mobs come after me too?

Smickey

(3,305 posts)
29. That's not god that's one of the Doobie Brothers.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:21 PM
Sep 2012

"takin it to the cheese".

Yea I know its bread but cheese works better.

Come on "takin it to the bread" just does not sing like cheese.

On edit: No I am not from Wisconsin.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
33. wouldnt be surprised if thats the next step
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:36 PM
Sep 2012

And there will be people who will blame you. Thats the progression once you start trying to justify the nuts who riot and kill because they were offended. It makes me wonder how far appeasement will go once you start.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
18. Yes. Mohamed saw how the Christians and Jews had fucked it up.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:46 PM
Sep 2012

They had turned from God to idolatry. He began his religous career preaching to Christians and Jews in Mecca and they told him to GTFO.

Jesus also preached against idolatry.

I doubt either of them wanted his legacy to be the worship of alters, paintings, relics and crap-o-belia from his life and times.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
45. Except that Jews did not have images
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:54 PM
Sep 2012

of gods, or anything like that when Muhammed started to preach to them. He literally took things from both, to create a third faith.

But Judaism had left the idolatry stage, and the problems with Ba'al worship, a common Mediterranean basin god, by about oh the Babylonian captivity. That be a few years before, like in the thousands and hundreds.

It was far more about the tribes that did have worship of idols than Jews or Christians...

BarackTheVote

(938 posts)
53. And neither did Christians and Orthodox
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 04:57 PM
Sep 2012

"worship [...] alters, paintings, relics and crap-o-belia from his life and times." Veneration is different from worship. Worship is and has always been reserved for God alone.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
57. I might counter that with some forms that Christianity has taken around the world
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:05 PM
Sep 2012

or what native peoples have told me about the local church, and what is behind or under altars, or carved on walls. but I will behave. Hell, I even got some photos from the Church of Sta Lucia in Guanajuato that after those talks, took on a whole different meaning.

That said, mainstream WESTERN EUROPEAN, you are mostly correct.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
55. "It was far more about the tribes that did have worship of idols than Jews or Christians..."
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:03 PM
Sep 2012

Yes. Especially after the Christians and Jews kicked him out of Mecca.

 

Hestia

(3,818 posts)
64. There is an interesting book named "Catastrophe" (which is now out of print) written in the UK
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:14 PM
Sep 2012

In the book, he relates a story that the reason Islam came into being is because Mohammed's family was rich and there was a famine going on at the time. If people wanted bread, they had to convert. I'll have to dig the book out and go back and reread that section.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
24. I just proves how dangerous religion is, and how ridiculous the entire concept is.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 01:56 PM
Sep 2012

Believing in a mythical figure without evidence it exist.

BarackTheVote

(938 posts)
56. Oh, come ON--
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:05 PM
Sep 2012

people are naturally aggressive against The Other; it's hard-wired into our brains. If religion disappeared tomorrow, people killing other people wouldn't go away--their reasons for doing so would simply change. Even now, most of what we call "religious atrocities" (the Spanish Inquisition, and the Crusades, for example) had other, complex historical and geopolitical reasons for occurring beyond the simplistic interpretation that "it was religion's fault."

You don't have to practice religion, you don't even have to like religion, but to blame religion for everything wrong with humanity for the last 2000 years is absurd.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
71. This ^ Religion is part of the my God is better than your God. And the response is
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:20 PM
Sep 2012

well my God can kick your God's ass.

BarackTheVote

(938 posts)
82. So you weigh
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:14 AM
Sep 2012

power-grubbing, greed for resources, greed for land, xenophobia, and vengeance as 20% of the equation? I really think you should check your math

I will grant you that religion is, far too often, the opiate of the masses, with far, far, too many people subjugating their intellect and their own conscience to words from a pulpit, from a person whose only qualification is that they've been able to convince people that they know more about a book than they do (and this coming from someone religious, I gotta call 'em like I see 'em). But remember Rome: while the Plebes made pious sacrifice at the temples, most Patricians were laughing behind their backs and plotting how to exploit the religious devotion of the less fortunate. A lot of wars were sold to the Plebes with religious terminology, but you can bet that the majority of the times, it was the Aristocracy using religion as a rallying cry for their own greedy interests.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
30. On DU I've always been taught the idea that people
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:25 PM
Sep 2012

get to decide what offends them. So carrying that forward, I think that people who are Muslims have this same right of respect in general. Not legally, but morally, we know it upsets them and so why do it - seems those who do it are doing it because they know they will get a reaction.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
35. i agree they have the same right of respect but it goes both ways
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:38 PM
Sep 2012

Somehow i dont think the nuts have any respect for our rights and culture of free speech and being idiots.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
36. I don't think thats ever been looked into
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:14 PM
Sep 2012

I don't see them trying to offend us a Christians, per se, and perhaps they would know if would not have an effect. I don't think the most rabid hate Christians, but America, the US and its power. And there are Muslims in America. The biggest difference between the two cultures is the power of religion in government - we have the First Amendment and freedom of religion. To their culture that's an alien idea.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
42. Their religion has control of the government
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:45 PM
Sep 2012

Especially in Saudi Arabia. So the religion is a greater part of their lives. We would not kill Muslims over that but Muslims in the USA cannot have that life - they are just another religion, free to practice, but not free to impose any kind of Sharia law, even in a local entity where they might be a majority. Of course there are the crazies in Kansas and other places that feel it necessary to bar "Sharia law."

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
46. And vice versa
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:55 PM
Sep 2012

The Saudi family uses religion as a tool of political control. But that notwithstanding, civilized people don't go off on murderous tangents because they have been "offended". Otherwise, Saudi Arabia would be a sea of glass.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
73. Civilized people don't murder for any reason
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:34 PM
Sep 2012

Their motives vary, but they are all crazy.

But there's no reason to provoke them if you know they are crazy enough - it's been known for a long time there are some Muslims who get that upset. Going back to the Rushdie novel.

But I don't think it's the movie alone. It's the movie combined with all the rest of it.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
34. Historically that has ebbed and flowed, and Christians and Jews have the same issues
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 02:36 PM
Sep 2012

Christians Iconoclasts were quite violent during that schism.

And Judaism has had its own issues with figuration.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
41. Anthony Quinn's 1976 film: Mohammed, Messenger of God
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:37 PM
Sep 2012

also known under the title "The Message". Despite the film being about the life of Mohammed, he never appeared as an actor in the film nor did we hear his voice. Anthony Quinn played Hamza, Mohammed's uncle, who leads his armies into battle and who had to pretend to hear the voice of Mohammed and repeat his words. Sometimes Mohammed is played by the camera and we see what Mohammed is seeing through the camera's point of view. Quinn turned in one of the greatest performances of his career. Despite the fact that the filmmakers followed Islamic tradition in not depicting the image of the Prophet, despite the fact the director was a Moslem, there were a lot of protests by Islamic groups and even buildings in Washington, D.C. were taken over by protestors.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad,_Messenger_of_God

"...In accordance with Muslim beliefs regarding depictions of Muhammad, he was not depicted on-screen nor was his voice heard. At the beginning of the film, a statement is displayed, "The makers of this film honour the Islamic tradition which holds that the impersonation of the Prophet offends against the spirituality of his message. Therefore, the person of Mohammad will not be shown."

This rule extended to his wives, his daughters, his sons-in-law, and the first caliphs (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali). This left Muhammad's uncle Hamza (Anthony Quinn) and his adopted son Zayd (Damien Thomas) as the central characters. During the battles of Badr and Uhud depicted in the movie, Hamza was in nominal command, even though the actual fighting was led by Muhammad.

Whenever Muhammad was present or very close by, his presence was indicated by light organ music. His words, as he spoke them, were repeated by someone else such as Hamza, Zayd and Bilal. When a scene called for him to be present, the action was filmed from his point of view. Others in the scene nodded to the unheard dialogue. ..."

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
60. Well, in the Old Testament God forbids the making of idols but Christians simply ignore
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 05:08 PM
Sep 2012

this with millions of statues of Jesus and other likenesses...even though its against the command to not make any graven images.

RedCappedBandit

(5,514 posts)
43. Don't care.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 03:48 PM
Sep 2012

They're free to believe whatever ridiculous fairy tales they want. They have no fucking right to use that as an excuse to kill anyone. This goes for wackos of all stripes.

 

Navl

(18 posts)
48. If they follow
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 04:04 PM
Sep 2012

the Quran that is what they are supposed to do to infidels....they either convert or die.

angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
49. Here are 10 types of people the Bible tells you to kill...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 04:26 PM
Sep 2012

Link to: http://957chatterton.blogspot.com/2012/06/top-ten-people-bible-tells-you-to-kill.html


10) Anyone who doesn't believe a priest
“Anyone arrogant enough to reject the verdict of the judge or of the priest who represents the LORD your God must be put to death. Such evil must be purged from Israel.” Deuteronomy 17: 12 NLT
9) Fortunetellers
“A man or a woman who acts as a medium or fortuneteller shall be put to death by stoning; they have no one but themselves to blame for their death.” Leviticus 20: 27 NAB
8) Witches
“You should not let a sorceress live.” Exodus 22: 17 NAB
7) Those who work on the Sabbath
“The LORD then gave these further instructions to Moses: 'Tell the people of Israel to keep my Sabbath day, for the Sabbath is a sign of the covenant between me and you forever. It helps you to remember that I am the LORD, who makes you holy. Yes, keep the Sabbath day, for it is holy. Anyone who desecrates it must die; anyone who works on that day will be cut off from the community. Work six days only, but the seventh day must be a day of total rest. I repeat: Because the LORD considers it a holy day, anyone who works on the Sabbath must be put to death.' “ Exodus 31:12-15 NLT

6) Non-virgins
“But if this charge is true (that she wasn't a virgin on her wedding night), and evidence of the girls virginity is not found, they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her fathers house and there her townsman shall stone her to death, because she committed a crime against Israel by her unchasteness in her father's house. Thus shall you purge the evil from your midst.” Deuteronomy 22: 20-21 NAB

5) Homosexuals
"If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives." Leviticus 20: 13 NAB

4) Followers of other religions
“Whoever sacrifices to any god, except the Lord alone, shall be doomed.” Exodus 22: 19 NAB

3) Sons of sinners
“Make ready to slaughter his sons for the guilt of their fathers; Lest they rise and posses the earth, and fill the breadth of the world with tyrants.” Isaiah 14: 21 NAB

2) Atheists
“They entered into a covenant to seek the Lord, the God of their fathers, with all their heart and soul; and everyone who would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, was to be put to death, to think rationally? I will not respect any religions that will convict me of a thought crime.

1) Rape victims
“If within the city a man comes upon a maiden who is betrothed, and has relations with her, you shall bring them both out of the gate of the city and there stone them to death: the girl because she did not cry out for help though she was in the city, and the man because he violated his neighbors wife.” Deuteronomy 22: 23-24 NAB

 

Navl

(18 posts)
68. I am sure
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:07 PM
Sep 2012

it's a little confusing to you, but those are from the Old Testament, which has it's place, but the New Testament, which is what most Christians adhere to (or should), is one of redemption and forgiveness. The relationship between the old and new testaments is somewhat complex.

The Qur'an is quite clear about what is to be done with those who do not believe as it says they should. The way they reconcile the deaths of other "Muslims" like those that died on 9/11 is that those could not be true believers since they were not living as Mohammed dictated. Even though the Qur'an decries the death of "innocents", the definition of just who those innocents are is interpretive. Certainly the people in our embassy would not be considered as such under any definition.

The real problem over there is that their religion and their governments are intertwined, so the policies of the state take the form of the dictates of their religion. Some have claimed that we just need to put up with it since it was a democratic choice. However, democracy without safeguards for the minority is no better than Nazi Germany. In other words, a democracy in and of itself does not add legitimacy to a government. The United States, btw, is not a democracy, it is a republic. The president isn't elected by the people, he is elected by the electoral college which is there to help safeguard against mob rule resulting in dissenting parties being persecuted.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
69. Yes I was aware
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:12 PM
Sep 2012

I can't see the relevence .... Muslims are expressly prohibited from the slaughter of innocents

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
72. Thats part of the problem, i think, with the whole idea of "prophets"
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 07:22 PM
Sep 2012

Dude says, offhandedly, "don't pick your nose", 600 years later fingers and noses are being hacked off willy nilly, folks are being tortured to find out if they are part of the blasphemous nose picking sect, etc.


"cast off the shoe, follow the gourd!"

 

Codeine

(25,586 posts)
76. I don't give two tugs of a dead dog's dick what they think about
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:02 PM
Sep 2012

their ridiculous Invisible Sky Fairy. People who hold to the fundie version of that religion want to turn the clock back a thousand years -- they are cordially invited to suck my cock.

Strange that a site that fights for gay marriage constantly wants to go to bat for a group of Bronze Age fucknuggets who want to stone gays for light entertainment.

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)
84. There used to be a brilliant scholar of Islam that posted on DU.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:08 AM
Sep 2012

She gave us this link with lots of images of Mohamed. Islam is not all one thing just as Christianity is not all one thing. There are worlds between a Catholic and Presbyterian and an Essene.

The fundamentalist wave in Islam is kind of new and associated with Wahhabism. I like Sufism. I think it is far out and interesting. Wahhabis fucking hate Sufis.


http://zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/

It seems that even hep, hip, enlightened, educated, progressive, liberal, big tent DU could stand to learn a lot about the history of Islam and the Arabs. The misunderstanding and in some cases thinly veiled prejudice in this thread makes me sad.



sinkingfeeling

(51,438 posts)
87. +10,000 Finally, a serious and honest response! I am shocked by how
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 08:42 AM
Sep 2012

all these "liberals and progressives" have responded.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
89. We certainly go out of our way to rationalize offending other people
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:24 PM
Sep 2012

We certainly go out of our way to rationalize offending other people. Might be easier to simply allow ourselves to rationalize being polite and respectful to other people instead.

But as that isn't quite as viscerally entertaining, doesn't fit on a clever t-shirt logo, couldn't be marketed into an Xbox game, and won't grab eyeballs on our bumper-stickers, it probably won't sell. More's the pity...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Why Muslims Decry P...